继续医学教育课程的哺乳住宿:参加者的态度、需求、偏好和经验。

IF 2.9
Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1177/17455057251375704
Patricia Carey, Arya B Mohabbat, Elizabeth Wight, Sanjeev Nanda, Sara Bonnes, Debra Blomberg, Ivana T Croghan, Darrell Schroeder, Hannah Nordhues
{"title":"继续医学教育课程的哺乳住宿:参加者的态度、需求、偏好和经验。","authors":"Patricia Carey, Arya B Mohabbat, Elizabeth Wight, Sanjeev Nanda, Sara Bonnes, Debra Blomberg, Ivana T Croghan, Darrell Schroeder, Hannah Nordhues","doi":"10.1177/17455057251375704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of data regarding the current state of lactation accommodations at continuing medical education (CME) events to guide best practice recommendations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate CME attendee attitudes, experiences, and preferences as it pertains to lactation support accommodations at CME events.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study utilizing an electronic-based survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were administered electronically to attendees of seven CME courses from August 2022 to October 2023, and de-identified data were collected to a secure database. Attitudes regarding lactation accommodations, personal preferences for lactation accommodations, and experiences with lactation at CME events were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 337 survey respondents, 169 had personal experience with lactation and 47 had experience with lactation at a CME course within the past 10 years. The majority of respondents agreed that lactation accommodations should be a priority (<i>n</i> = 264, 83%) and are a medical need (<i>n</i> = 285, 89%). Of those with recent experience lactating at a CME course, only 19% (<i>n</i> = 9) indicated adequate lactation accommodations were provided. Due to inadequate accommodations, 77% (<i>n</i> = 36) of respondents experienced decreased participation in the CME course content, 70% (<i>n</i> = 33) claimed fewer hours of CME credit, and 74% (<i>n</i> = 35) experienced decreased satisfaction in the CME course. Preferences for lactation accommodations included proximity to the meeting, audio-visual streaming of content, privacy, security, and signage supporting lactation in addition to an adequate designated space with access to an electrical plug and water supply.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current state of lactation accommodations at CME courses is inadequate and contributes to inequitable experiences for lactating participants. Course participants are supportive of lactating healthcare professionals at CME courses and recognize lactation accommodations as a priority. Further work is needed to inform and institute changes to lactation accommodations for healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251375704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lactation accommodations at continuing medical education courses: Attendee attitudes, needs, preferences, and experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Carey, Arya B Mohabbat, Elizabeth Wight, Sanjeev Nanda, Sara Bonnes, Debra Blomberg, Ivana T Croghan, Darrell Schroeder, Hannah Nordhues\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057251375704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of data regarding the current state of lactation accommodations at continuing medical education (CME) events to guide best practice recommendations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate CME attendee attitudes, experiences, and preferences as it pertains to lactation support accommodations at CME events.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study utilizing an electronic-based survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were administered electronically to attendees of seven CME courses from August 2022 to October 2023, and de-identified data were collected to a secure database. Attitudes regarding lactation accommodations, personal preferences for lactation accommodations, and experiences with lactation at CME events were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 337 survey respondents, 169 had personal experience with lactation and 47 had experience with lactation at a CME course within the past 10 years. The majority of respondents agreed that lactation accommodations should be a priority (<i>n</i> = 264, 83%) and are a medical need (<i>n</i> = 285, 89%). Of those with recent experience lactating at a CME course, only 19% (<i>n</i> = 9) indicated adequate lactation accommodations were provided. Due to inadequate accommodations, 77% (<i>n</i> = 36) of respondents experienced decreased participation in the CME course content, 70% (<i>n</i> = 33) claimed fewer hours of CME credit, and 74% (<i>n</i> = 35) experienced decreased satisfaction in the CME course. Preferences for lactation accommodations included proximity to the meeting, audio-visual streaming of content, privacy, security, and signage supporting lactation in addition to an adequate designated space with access to an electrical plug and water supply.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current state of lactation accommodations at CME courses is inadequate and contributes to inequitable experiences for lactating participants. Course participants are supportive of lactating healthcare professionals at CME courses and recognize lactation accommodations as a priority. Further work is needed to inform and institute changes to lactation accommodations for healthcare professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"17455057251375704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444053/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251375704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251375704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前缺乏关于继续医学教育(CME)活动中哺乳住宿状况的数据,以指导最佳实践建议。目的:评估CME参与者对CME活动中哺乳支持住宿的态度、经验和偏好。设计:采用电子调查的横断面研究。方法:从2022年8月至2023年10月,对7门CME课程的参与者进行电子调查,并将去识别数据收集到安全数据库中。对哺乳住宿的态度,个人对哺乳住宿的偏好,以及在CME活动中的哺乳经历进行了分析。结果:在337名调查对象中,169人有过泌乳经历,47人在过去10年内有过在CME课程中泌乳的经历。大多数受访者同意,哺乳场所应该是一个优先事项(n = 264,83%),并且是一种医疗需求(n = 285,89%)。在那些最近在CME课程中有泌乳经历的人中,只有19% (n = 9)表示提供了足够的泌乳设施。由于住宿条件不足,77% (n = 36)的受访者表示对CME课程内容的参与减少,70% (n = 33)的受访者声称CME学分减少,74% (n = 35)的受访者表示对CME课程的满意度下降。对哺乳场所的偏好包括靠近会议、内容的视听流、隐私、安全和支持哺乳的标志,以及足够的指定空间,可以使用电源插头和供水。结论:目前CME课程的哺乳期住宿条件不足,导致哺乳期参与者的不公平体验。课程参与者在CME课程中支持哺乳期医疗保健专业人员,并将哺乳期住宿视为优先事项。需要进一步的工作来告知和制定保健专业人员哺乳场所的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lactation accommodations at continuing medical education courses: Attendee attitudes, needs, preferences, and experiences.

Lactation accommodations at continuing medical education courses: Attendee attitudes, needs, preferences, and experiences.

Lactation accommodations at continuing medical education courses: Attendee attitudes, needs, preferences, and experiences.

Lactation accommodations at continuing medical education courses: Attendee attitudes, needs, preferences, and experiences.

Background: There is a lack of data regarding the current state of lactation accommodations at continuing medical education (CME) events to guide best practice recommendations.

Objective: To evaluate CME attendee attitudes, experiences, and preferences as it pertains to lactation support accommodations at CME events.

Design: A cross-sectional study utilizing an electronic-based survey.

Methods: Surveys were administered electronically to attendees of seven CME courses from August 2022 to October 2023, and de-identified data were collected to a secure database. Attitudes regarding lactation accommodations, personal preferences for lactation accommodations, and experiences with lactation at CME events were analyzed.

Results: Of the 337 survey respondents, 169 had personal experience with lactation and 47 had experience with lactation at a CME course within the past 10 years. The majority of respondents agreed that lactation accommodations should be a priority (n = 264, 83%) and are a medical need (n = 285, 89%). Of those with recent experience lactating at a CME course, only 19% (n = 9) indicated adequate lactation accommodations were provided. Due to inadequate accommodations, 77% (n = 36) of respondents experienced decreased participation in the CME course content, 70% (n = 33) claimed fewer hours of CME credit, and 74% (n = 35) experienced decreased satisfaction in the CME course. Preferences for lactation accommodations included proximity to the meeting, audio-visual streaming of content, privacy, security, and signage supporting lactation in addition to an adequate designated space with access to an electrical plug and water supply.

Conclusions: The current state of lactation accommodations at CME courses is inadequate and contributes to inequitable experiences for lactating participants. Course participants are supportive of lactating healthcare professionals at CME courses and recognize lactation accommodations as a priority. Further work is needed to inform and institute changes to lactation accommodations for healthcare professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信