早期活动对创伤性脑损伤患者临床预后的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Fei Xia, Caiyun Li, Yiwen Liu
{"title":"早期活动对创伤性脑损伤患者临床预后的影响。","authors":"Fei Xia, Caiyun Li, Yiwen Liu","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early mobilisation (EM) is a rehabilitative approach hypothesised to improve functional and clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, its benefits remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of EM on neurological recovery, motor function, quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes in patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang and CNKI databases for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes included changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), QoL, mortality and adverse events. A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven RCTs with 898 patients with TBI were included. EM significantly reduced NIHSS scores (MD: -4.51, 95% CI: -5.60 to -3.43, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and improved FMA scores (MD: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.81-6.97, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 31%), indicating enhanced neurological recovery and motor function. QoL scores also improved with EM (SMD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48-2.12, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 42%). However, EM did not significantly influence FIM (p = 0.15) or mortality (p = 1.00). Trends towards lower adverse event rates were observed but did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EM is associated with improved neurological and motor recovery and enhanced QoL in patients with TBI. While its impact on mortality and adverse events requires further validation, this evidence supports incorporating EM into standard TBI rehabilitation protocols.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis highlight the importance of early mobilisation (EM) as a key component of rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury. EM significantly improves neurological recovery, motor function and quality of life, supporting its integration into standard clinical practice. Given the potential for improved patient outcomes, healthcare providers, particularly nurses and rehabilitation specialists, should prioritise safe and individualised EM protocols to enhance functional recovery while minimising risks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The protocol of the meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with the identifier CRD42025640625.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 5","pages":"e70166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Early Mobilisation on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Fei Xia, Caiyun Li, Yiwen Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early mobilisation (EM) is a rehabilitative approach hypothesised to improve functional and clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, its benefits remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of EM on neurological recovery, motor function, quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes in patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang and CNKI databases for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes included changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), QoL, mortality and adverse events. A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven RCTs with 898 patients with TBI were included. EM significantly reduced NIHSS scores (MD: -4.51, 95% CI: -5.60 to -3.43, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and improved FMA scores (MD: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.81-6.97, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 31%), indicating enhanced neurological recovery and motor function. QoL scores also improved with EM (SMD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48-2.12, p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 42%). However, EM did not significantly influence FIM (p = 0.15) or mortality (p = 1.00). Trends towards lower adverse event rates were observed but did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EM is associated with improved neurological and motor recovery and enhanced QoL in patients with TBI. While its impact on mortality and adverse events requires further validation, this evidence supports incorporating EM into standard TBI rehabilitation protocols.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis highlight the importance of early mobilisation (EM) as a key component of rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury. EM significantly improves neurological recovery, motor function and quality of life, supporting its integration into standard clinical practice. Given the potential for improved patient outcomes, healthcare providers, particularly nurses and rehabilitation specialists, should prioritise safe and individualised EM protocols to enhance functional recovery while minimising risks.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The protocol of the meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with the identifier CRD42025640625.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"e70166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期活动(EM)是一种康复方法,假设可以改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的功能和临床结果。然而,它的好处仍然存在争议。目的:本研究的目的是评估EM对TBI患者神经功能恢复、运动功能、生活质量(QoL)和临床预后的影响。研究设计:进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、万方和CNKI数据库中相关的随机对照试验(RCTs)。结果包括美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA)、功能独立性测量(FIM)、生活质量、死亡率和不良事件的变化。采用随机效应模型通过纳入异质性来汇总结果。结果:纳入11项随机对照试验,共898例TBI患者。EM显著降低了NIHSS评分(MD: -4.51, 95% CI: -5.60 ~ -3.43, p 2 = 0%),改善了FMA评分(MD: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.81 ~ 6.97, p 2 = 31%),表明神经恢复和运动功能增强。EM也改善了生活质量评分(SMD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48-2.12, p 2 = 42%)。然而,EM对FIM (p = 0.15)或死亡率(p = 1.00)没有显著影响。观察到不良事件发生率降低的趋势,但没有统计学意义。结论:EM与TBI患者神经和运动恢复改善以及生活质量提高有关。虽然其对死亡率和不良事件的影响需要进一步验证,但这一证据支持将EM纳入标准的TBI康复方案。与临床实践的相关性:本荟萃分析的结果强调了早期活动(EM)作为创伤性脑损伤患者康复的关键组成部分的重要性。EM显著改善神经恢复、运动功能和生活质量,支持其融入标准临床实践。鉴于改善患者预后的潜力,医疗保健提供者,特别是护士和康复专家,应优先考虑安全和个性化的EM方案,以增强功能恢复,同时将风险降至最低。试验注册:该荟萃分析方案已在PROSPERO注册,标识符为CRD42025640625。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Early Mobilisation on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background: Early mobilisation (EM) is a rehabilitative approach hypothesised to improve functional and clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, its benefits remain controversial.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of EM on neurological recovery, motor function, quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes in patients with TBI.

Study design: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang and CNKI databases for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes included changes in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), QoL, mortality and adverse events. A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating heterogeneity.

Results: Eleven RCTs with 898 patients with TBI were included. EM significantly reduced NIHSS scores (MD: -4.51, 95% CI: -5.60 to -3.43, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and improved FMA scores (MD: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.81-6.97, p < 0.001; I2 = 31%), indicating enhanced neurological recovery and motor function. QoL scores also improved with EM (SMD: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48-2.12, p < 0.001; I2 = 42%). However, EM did not significantly influence FIM (p = 0.15) or mortality (p = 1.00). Trends towards lower adverse event rates were observed but did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: EM is associated with improved neurological and motor recovery and enhanced QoL in patients with TBI. While its impact on mortality and adverse events requires further validation, this evidence supports incorporating EM into standard TBI rehabilitation protocols.

Relevance to clinical practice: The findings of this meta-analysis highlight the importance of early mobilisation (EM) as a key component of rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury. EM significantly improves neurological recovery, motor function and quality of life, supporting its integration into standard clinical practice. Given the potential for improved patient outcomes, healthcare providers, particularly nurses and rehabilitation specialists, should prioritise safe and individualised EM protocols to enhance functional recovery while minimising risks.

Trial registration: The protocol of the meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with the identifier CRD42025640625.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信