微血管游离皮瓣在头颈部再造术中的应用效果。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Friedrich Mrosk, Emilia Schott, Victoria Vertic, Maximilian Richte, Jan Oliver Voß, Christian Doll, Carsten Rendenbach, Norbert Neckel, Kilian Kreutzer, Max Heiland, Steffen Koerdt
{"title":"微血管游离皮瓣在头颈部再造术中的应用效果。","authors":"Friedrich Mrosk, Emilia Schott, Victoria Vertic, Maximilian Richte, Jan Oliver Voß, Christian Doll, Carsten Rendenbach, Norbert Neckel, Kilian Kreutzer, Max Heiland, Steffen Koerdt","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a standard technique in head and neck surgery with high success rates. Nevertheless, complications like early flap loss, locoregional recurrence of head and neck cancer and osteoradionecrosis may require further flap procedures. This study aims to assess outcomes and challenges associated with subsequent free flap procedures. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who received subsequent free flaps between January 2013 and December 2022 were assessed and examined by explorative descriptive analysis. Furthermore, one exemplary case is presented. Overall, 69 patients with 150 free flaps were included, with up to 4 subsequently performed flaps. Reasons for subsequent flaps included early failure, local cancer recurrence, osteoradionecrosis and wound healing disorders. After early failures, subsequent flaps were successful in 97 % of this cohort. The more flaps were performed, the more likely the contralateral neck was used for vascular anastomosis and the more likely vein grafts were used. Subsequent free flap procedures are safe and viable options in head and neck reconstruction, even in cases of previous flap failure. Even if previous surgeries, already harvested flaps and radiation therapy might complicate the choice of reconstruction, this should not be a deterrent to achieve consistent rehabilitation of the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy of subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Friedrich Mrosk, Emilia Schott, Victoria Vertic, Maximilian Richte, Jan Oliver Voß, Christian Doll, Carsten Rendenbach, Norbert Neckel, Kilian Kreutzer, Max Heiland, Steffen Koerdt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a standard technique in head and neck surgery with high success rates. Nevertheless, complications like early flap loss, locoregional recurrence of head and neck cancer and osteoradionecrosis may require further flap procedures. This study aims to assess outcomes and challenges associated with subsequent free flap procedures. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who received subsequent free flaps between January 2013 and December 2022 were assessed and examined by explorative descriptive analysis. Furthermore, one exemplary case is presented. Overall, 69 patients with 150 free flaps were included, with up to 4 subsequently performed flaps. Reasons for subsequent flaps included early failure, local cancer recurrence, osteoradionecrosis and wound healing disorders. After early failures, subsequent flaps were successful in 97 % of this cohort. The more flaps were performed, the more likely the contralateral neck was used for vascular anastomosis and the more likely vein grafts were used. Subsequent free flap procedures are safe and viable options in head and neck reconstruction, even in cases of previous flap failure. Even if previous surgeries, already harvested flaps and radiation therapy might complicate the choice of reconstruction, this should not be a deterrent to achieve consistent rehabilitation of the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.09.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微血管游离皮瓣重建是头颈部外科手术的标准技术,成功率高。然而,诸如早期皮瓣丢失、头颈癌局部复发和骨放射性坏死等并发症可能需要进一步的皮瓣手术。本研究旨在评估与后续游离皮瓣手术相关的结果和挑战。在这项回顾性队列研究中,通过探索性描述性分析对2013年1月至2022年12月期间接受游离皮瓣移植的所有患者进行评估和检查。并给出了一个实例。总体而言,69例患者接受了150个游离皮瓣,其中4例随后进行了皮瓣移植。后续皮瓣的原因包括早期失败、局部癌症复发、骨放射性坏死和伤口愈合障碍。在早期失败后,该队列中97%的患者后续皮瓣移植成功。皮瓣越多,对侧颈部血管吻合的可能性越大,静脉移植的可能性越大。随后的自由皮瓣手术是头颈部重建的安全和可行的选择,即使在先前皮瓣失败的情况下。即使以前的手术,已经切除的皮瓣和放射治疗可能使重建的选择复杂化,这也不应该成为实现患者持续康复的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy of subsequent microvascular free flaps in head and neck reconstructive surgery.

Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a standard technique in head and neck surgery with high success rates. Nevertheless, complications like early flap loss, locoregional recurrence of head and neck cancer and osteoradionecrosis may require further flap procedures. This study aims to assess outcomes and challenges associated with subsequent free flap procedures. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients who received subsequent free flaps between January 2013 and December 2022 were assessed and examined by explorative descriptive analysis. Furthermore, one exemplary case is presented. Overall, 69 patients with 150 free flaps were included, with up to 4 subsequently performed flaps. Reasons for subsequent flaps included early failure, local cancer recurrence, osteoradionecrosis and wound healing disorders. After early failures, subsequent flaps were successful in 97 % of this cohort. The more flaps were performed, the more likely the contralateral neck was used for vascular anastomosis and the more likely vein grafts were used. Subsequent free flap procedures are safe and viable options in head and neck reconstruction, even in cases of previous flap failure. Even if previous surgeries, already harvested flaps and radiation therapy might complicate the choice of reconstruction, this should not be a deterrent to achieve consistent rehabilitation of the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信