母乳喂养和水安全。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rafael Pérez-Escamilla, Victoria Hall Moran
{"title":"母乳喂养和水安全。","authors":"Rafael Pérez-Escamilla,&nbsp;Victoria Hall Moran","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water security has been defined by the United Nations as “<i>The capacity of a population to safeguard sustainable access to adequate quantities of acceptable quality water for sustaining livelihoods, human well-being, and socioeconomic development, for ensuring protection against water-borne pollution and water-related disasters, and for preserving ecosystems in a climate of peace and political stability”</i> (United Nations <span>2013</span>). As such, water security is crucial for human and planetary health and the development of nations. As addressed at the 2025 World Water Week held in Stockholm August 24-28, climate change has become a formidable challenge for water security globally. In this editorial we make the case that investing in breastfeeding protection, promotion and support should be a key component of national and global strategies to address water insecurity.</p><p>Global recommendations call for infants to be exclusively breastfed for 6 months, making breastmilk is the only source of water for infants of this age. As over 85% of breastmilk is water, babies can indeed meet their water needs through breastfeeding (Martin et al. <span>2016</span>). Once complementary foods are introduced at around 6 months infants are recommended to continue to breastfeed for at least their first 2 years of life, hence breast milk can also be an important source of water security for infants and toddlers beyond the first 6 months of life.</p><p>It is estimated that 2,562.5 billion liters of water are used every year in the production and use of commercial milk formula (CMF) by infants under 6 months (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). Therefore, investing in breastfeeding protection, promotion and support can reduce substantially the use of water across the globe. Climate change mitigation requires bringing down the levels of greenhouse gases (GHG) which mainly come from industrial activity. The CMF industry generates between 5.9 and 7.5 billion kg CO2 eq. every year because of environmental degradation and fossil fuel use related to dairy farming, milk processing, and CMF production, transportation, storage and preparation. Exclusive breastfeeding, in contrast, produces a far lower carbon footprint compared to feeding with CMF (Andresen et al. <span>2022</span>; Karlsson et al. <span>2019</span>). The massive impact of the CMF industry on climate change and water use is evident at the country level. Using India as an example, CMF consumption among infants under 6 months utilizes 250.6 billion liters of water and GHG emissions range from 579 to 737 million kg CO2 eq. annually, despite the country's high breastfeeding prevalence among infants under 6 months (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). For this reason, it has been recommended for breastfeeding to be included in climate change mitigation agreements and investments within countries and across the globe (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>) (Figure 1).</p><p>Moreover, climate change is driving an increase in extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and storms, which frequently damage water and sanitation infrastructure. These disruptions intensify risks of food insecurity and waterborne diseases, leaving infants and young children especially vulnerable. In such circumstances, breastfeeding offers critical protection by providing a safe, nutritionally adequate, and pathogen-free food source, while also conferring immunological benefits that reduce infection risk. Yet, disaster conditions often compromise breastfeeding through disrupted health systems, unregulated distribution of breast-milk substitutes, and limited privacy in shelters - factors that underscore the urgent need to prioritise and sustain breastfeeding as a core public health intervention during both emergency response and recovery phases (Bartick et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>There is a profound connection between water security and food security (Young et al. <span>2021</span>) and breastfeeding is a prime example of this relationship in early infancy. Although breastfeeding has been increasingly recognized as a key component of food systems under regular circumstances and during humanitarian emergencies (Pérez-Escamilla and Moran <span>2023</span>) it is rarely mentioned as being key for the water security of infants and young children and the planet. The contributions that women make to environmental protection through breastfeeding should be recognized through investments in strengthening the breastfeeding protection and support systems they need (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). There is ample evidence to support funding breastfeeding interventions and policies as legitimate carbon offsets investments (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). Moving forward MCN would like to encourage the submission of articles for consideration focusing on the role that breastfeeding has in the food and water security of infants, their families and societies, and the planet (Figure 1).</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":"21 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.70114","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breastfeeding and Water Security\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Pérez-Escamilla,&nbsp;Victoria Hall Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mcn.70114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Water security has been defined by the United Nations as “<i>The capacity of a population to safeguard sustainable access to adequate quantities of acceptable quality water for sustaining livelihoods, human well-being, and socioeconomic development, for ensuring protection against water-borne pollution and water-related disasters, and for preserving ecosystems in a climate of peace and political stability”</i> (United Nations <span>2013</span>). As such, water security is crucial for human and planetary health and the development of nations. As addressed at the 2025 World Water Week held in Stockholm August 24-28, climate change has become a formidable challenge for water security globally. In this editorial we make the case that investing in breastfeeding protection, promotion and support should be a key component of national and global strategies to address water insecurity.</p><p>Global recommendations call for infants to be exclusively breastfed for 6 months, making breastmilk is the only source of water for infants of this age. As over 85% of breastmilk is water, babies can indeed meet their water needs through breastfeeding (Martin et al. <span>2016</span>). Once complementary foods are introduced at around 6 months infants are recommended to continue to breastfeed for at least their first 2 years of life, hence breast milk can also be an important source of water security for infants and toddlers beyond the first 6 months of life.</p><p>It is estimated that 2,562.5 billion liters of water are used every year in the production and use of commercial milk formula (CMF) by infants under 6 months (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). Therefore, investing in breastfeeding protection, promotion and support can reduce substantially the use of water across the globe. Climate change mitigation requires bringing down the levels of greenhouse gases (GHG) which mainly come from industrial activity. The CMF industry generates between 5.9 and 7.5 billion kg CO2 eq. every year because of environmental degradation and fossil fuel use related to dairy farming, milk processing, and CMF production, transportation, storage and preparation. Exclusive breastfeeding, in contrast, produces a far lower carbon footprint compared to feeding with CMF (Andresen et al. <span>2022</span>; Karlsson et al. <span>2019</span>). The massive impact of the CMF industry on climate change and water use is evident at the country level. Using India as an example, CMF consumption among infants under 6 months utilizes 250.6 billion liters of water and GHG emissions range from 579 to 737 million kg CO2 eq. annually, despite the country's high breastfeeding prevalence among infants under 6 months (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). For this reason, it has been recommended for breastfeeding to be included in climate change mitigation agreements and investments within countries and across the globe (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>) (Figure 1).</p><p>Moreover, climate change is driving an increase in extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and storms, which frequently damage water and sanitation infrastructure. These disruptions intensify risks of food insecurity and waterborne diseases, leaving infants and young children especially vulnerable. In such circumstances, breastfeeding offers critical protection by providing a safe, nutritionally adequate, and pathogen-free food source, while also conferring immunological benefits that reduce infection risk. Yet, disaster conditions often compromise breastfeeding through disrupted health systems, unregulated distribution of breast-milk substitutes, and limited privacy in shelters - factors that underscore the urgent need to prioritise and sustain breastfeeding as a core public health intervention during both emergency response and recovery phases (Bartick et al. <span>2024</span>).</p><p>There is a profound connection between water security and food security (Young et al. <span>2021</span>) and breastfeeding is a prime example of this relationship in early infancy. Although breastfeeding has been increasingly recognized as a key component of food systems under regular circumstances and during humanitarian emergencies (Pérez-Escamilla and Moran <span>2023</span>) it is rarely mentioned as being key for the water security of infants and young children and the planet. The contributions that women make to environmental protection through breastfeeding should be recognized through investments in strengthening the breastfeeding protection and support systems they need (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). There is ample evidence to support funding breastfeeding interventions and policies as legitimate carbon offsets investments (Smith et al. <span>2024</span>). Moving forward MCN would like to encourage the submission of articles for consideration focusing on the role that breastfeeding has in the food and water security of infants, their families and societies, and the planet (Figure 1).</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.70114\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.70114\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.70114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联合国将水安全定义为“人口为维持生计、人类福祉和社会经济发展,确保免受水源污染和与水有关的灾害,以及在和平与政治稳定的气候下保护生态系统而可持续获得足够数量的、可接受的优质水的能力”(联合国,2013年)。因此,水安全对人类和地球健康以及各国的发展至关重要。正如8月24日至28日在斯德哥尔摩举行的2025年世界水周上所说,气候变化已成为全球水安全面临的巨大挑战。在这篇社论中,我们提出,投资于母乳喂养的保护、促进和支持应成为解决水不安全问题的国家和全球战略的一个关键组成部分。全球建议要求对婴儿进行6个月的纯母乳喂养,使母乳成为这个年龄段婴儿的唯一水源。由于母乳中85%以上是水,婴儿确实可以通过母乳喂养来满足他们对水的需求(Martin et al. 2016)。一旦在6个月左右引入辅食,建议婴儿至少在其生命的头2年继续母乳喂养,因此母乳也可以成为婴儿和幼儿在生命的头6个月之后的重要水安全来源。据估计,每年6个月以下婴儿在生产和使用商业配方奶粉(CMF)时要消耗25625亿升水(Smith et al. 2024)。因此,投资于母乳喂养的保护、促进和支持可以大幅减少全球的用水。减缓气候变化需要降低主要来自工业活动的温室气体(GHG)水平。由于环境恶化和与奶牛养殖、牛奶加工以及CMF生产、运输、储存和制备相关的化石燃料使用,CMF行业每年产生59亿至75亿千克二氧化碳当量。相比之下,纯母乳喂养产生的碳足迹远低于用CMF喂养(Andresen et al. 2022; Karlsson et al. 2019)。CMF产业对气候变化和水资源利用的巨大影响在国家层面上是显而易见的。以印度为例,尽管该国6个月以下婴儿的母乳喂养率很高,但6个月以下婴儿的CMF消费量每年消耗2506亿升水,温室气体排放量为5.79至7.37亿千克二氧化碳当量(Smith et al. 2024)。因此,建议将母乳喂养纳入各国和全球范围内的气候变化减缓协议和投资中(Smith et al. 2024)(图1)。此外,气候变化正在推动干旱、洪水和风暴等极端天气事件的增加,这些事件经常破坏水和卫生基础设施。这些破坏加剧了粮食不安全和水传播疾病的风险,使婴幼儿特别容易受到伤害。在这种情况下,母乳喂养通过提供安全、营养充足和无病原体的食物来源提供了至关重要的保护,同时还具有降低感染风险的免疫益处。然而,灾害条件往往会影响母乳喂养,因为卫生系统受到破坏,母乳代用品的分配不受管制,以及避难所的隐私受到限制——这些因素强调了迫切需要在应急反应和恢复阶段优先考虑并维持母乳喂养,将其作为一项核心公共卫生干预措施(Bartick et al. 2024)。水安全和粮食安全之间有着深刻的联系(Young et al. 2021),母乳喂养是婴儿早期这种关系的一个主要例子。尽管母乳喂养越来越被认为是正常情况下和人道主义紧急情况下粮食系统的一个关键组成部分(psamrez - escamilla and Moran 2023),但很少有人提到母乳喂养是婴幼儿和地球水安全的关键。妇女通过母乳喂养对环境保护做出的贡献应该通过投资加强母乳喂养保护和支持系统得到认可(Smith et al. 2024)。有充分的证据支持为母乳喂养干预措施和政策提供资金,作为合法的碳抵消投资(Smith et al. 2024)。展望未来,MCN希望鼓励提交文章以供审议,重点关注母乳喂养在婴儿、其家庭和社会以及地球的食物和水安全方面的作用(图1)。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Breastfeeding and Water Security

Breastfeeding and Water Security

Water security has been defined by the United Nations as “The capacity of a population to safeguard sustainable access to adequate quantities of acceptable quality water for sustaining livelihoods, human well-being, and socioeconomic development, for ensuring protection against water-borne pollution and water-related disasters, and for preserving ecosystems in a climate of peace and political stability” (United Nations 2013). As such, water security is crucial for human and planetary health and the development of nations. As addressed at the 2025 World Water Week held in Stockholm August 24-28, climate change has become a formidable challenge for water security globally. In this editorial we make the case that investing in breastfeeding protection, promotion and support should be a key component of national and global strategies to address water insecurity.

Global recommendations call for infants to be exclusively breastfed for 6 months, making breastmilk is the only source of water for infants of this age. As over 85% of breastmilk is water, babies can indeed meet their water needs through breastfeeding (Martin et al. 2016). Once complementary foods are introduced at around 6 months infants are recommended to continue to breastfeed for at least their first 2 years of life, hence breast milk can also be an important source of water security for infants and toddlers beyond the first 6 months of life.

It is estimated that 2,562.5 billion liters of water are used every year in the production and use of commercial milk formula (CMF) by infants under 6 months (Smith et al. 2024). Therefore, investing in breastfeeding protection, promotion and support can reduce substantially the use of water across the globe. Climate change mitigation requires bringing down the levels of greenhouse gases (GHG) which mainly come from industrial activity. The CMF industry generates between 5.9 and 7.5 billion kg CO2 eq. every year because of environmental degradation and fossil fuel use related to dairy farming, milk processing, and CMF production, transportation, storage and preparation. Exclusive breastfeeding, in contrast, produces a far lower carbon footprint compared to feeding with CMF (Andresen et al. 2022; Karlsson et al. 2019). The massive impact of the CMF industry on climate change and water use is evident at the country level. Using India as an example, CMF consumption among infants under 6 months utilizes 250.6 billion liters of water and GHG emissions range from 579 to 737 million kg CO2 eq. annually, despite the country's high breastfeeding prevalence among infants under 6 months (Smith et al. 2024). For this reason, it has been recommended for breastfeeding to be included in climate change mitigation agreements and investments within countries and across the globe (Smith et al. 2024) (Figure 1).

Moreover, climate change is driving an increase in extreme weather events such as droughts, floods, and storms, which frequently damage water and sanitation infrastructure. These disruptions intensify risks of food insecurity and waterborne diseases, leaving infants and young children especially vulnerable. In such circumstances, breastfeeding offers critical protection by providing a safe, nutritionally adequate, and pathogen-free food source, while also conferring immunological benefits that reduce infection risk. Yet, disaster conditions often compromise breastfeeding through disrupted health systems, unregulated distribution of breast-milk substitutes, and limited privacy in shelters - factors that underscore the urgent need to prioritise and sustain breastfeeding as a core public health intervention during both emergency response and recovery phases (Bartick et al. 2024).

There is a profound connection between water security and food security (Young et al. 2021) and breastfeeding is a prime example of this relationship in early infancy. Although breastfeeding has been increasingly recognized as a key component of food systems under regular circumstances and during humanitarian emergencies (Pérez-Escamilla and Moran 2023) it is rarely mentioned as being key for the water security of infants and young children and the planet. The contributions that women make to environmental protection through breastfeeding should be recognized through investments in strengthening the breastfeeding protection and support systems they need (Smith et al. 2024). There is ample evidence to support funding breastfeeding interventions and policies as legitimate carbon offsets investments (Smith et al. 2024). Moving forward MCN would like to encourage the submission of articles for consideration focusing on the role that breastfeeding has in the food and water security of infants, their families and societies, and the planet (Figure 1).

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信