{"title":"1型糖尿病和从儿科到成人护理的转移:单中心经验。","authors":"Betül Yiğit Yalçın, Ummahan Tercan, Melek Yildiz, Hülya Hacısahinogulları, Gülşah Yenidünya Yalın, Nurdan Gül, Ozlem Soyluk Selcukbiricik, Ayşe Kubat Üzüm, Sukran Poyrazoglu, Firdevs Baş, Kubilay Karşıdağ, İlhan Satman, Feyza Darendeliler","doi":"10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-1-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) necessitates lifelong management, and a standardized transition protocol with multidisciplinary support can help ease the shift from pediatric-focused healthcare to adult care systems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our objective was to assess the sociodemographic data, clinical features, and laboratory parameters that may influence the transition period and post-transition process among patients with T1DM and to compare results between two different transition models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 64 T1D patients who transitioned to the adult outpatient clinic at Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. Patients were followed up between 2001 and 2022, completed their pediatric follow-up, and participated in the shift from pediatric to adult outpatient care. Demographic data, clinical and metabolic parameters before and after the transition, the presence of diabetic complications and comorbidities, and treatment modalities were analyzed. These patients were transferred to adult care with two different transition models: in model 1, the transition was performed in a single meeting, whereas in model 2, it was performed over a period of 4-6 months. Due to pandemic-related disruptions, a few patients were transferred following telephone consultations and were excluded from model comparisons. The differences between the outcomes of the transition models were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis (43.7% female, age at diagnosis 9.4±3.9 years). At their last pediatric visit, the participants had a mean age of 19.4 ± 1.2 years (range 16.6-21.9). The mean age at transfer to adult care was 20.2 ± 1.4 years (17.7-23.1), and the mean age at the most recent adult visit was 23.2 ± 4.2 years (18.4-39.5). The median time in adult care follow-up was 3.3 (range 0.3-20.9) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 24.1 ± 1.7 kg/m² at transition to 23.6 ± 3.5 kg/m² during adult follow-up. Although the mean BMI fell slightly, obesity prevalence rose from 1.6 % to 9.6 %, reflecting a right-shift in the BMI distribution. Annual routine diabetes-care visits decreased from 3.0 ± 0.9 visits per year during pediatric follow-up to 2.1 ± 1.8 visits per year in adult care (p=0.009). The mean HbA1c level was significantly lower in adults (8.9% vs. 8.3%; p=0.007). Total insulin doses were significantly higher at transition than at the last adult care visit (0.95 vs 0.75 IU/kg/day; p=0.009). Basal insulin ratio was higher in adulthood (43.1% vs. 52.8%; p<0.0001). The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in adult care was higher (4.7% vs. 12.5%, p=0.11). The frequency of autoimmune thyroiditis and coeliac disease did not differ between adult and pediatric care. Although the frequency of microvascular and macrovascular complications increased in adult care, there was no statistically significant variation in acute and chronic complications. There were no statistically significant differences in glycemic outcomes, insulin requirements, or complication rates between transition models 1 and 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that a structured transition process may support better glycemic control and improved treatment adaptation in T1D management regardless of the model whether it involves a single-session or a gradual model, HbA1c levels improved during adult care, along with reduced insulin doses and increased basal insulin ratios. However, no significant difference was found between the two structured transition models, emphasizing the need for individualized and supportive approaches during this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Transfer from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Single-Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Betül Yiğit Yalçın, Ummahan Tercan, Melek Yildiz, Hülya Hacısahinogulları, Gülşah Yenidünya Yalın, Nurdan Gül, Ozlem Soyluk Selcukbiricik, Ayşe Kubat Üzüm, Sukran Poyrazoglu, Firdevs Baş, Kubilay Karşıdağ, İlhan Satman, Feyza Darendeliler\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-1-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) necessitates lifelong management, and a standardized transition protocol with multidisciplinary support can help ease the shift from pediatric-focused healthcare to adult care systems.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our objective was to assess the sociodemographic data, clinical features, and laboratory parameters that may influence the transition period and post-transition process among patients with T1DM and to compare results between two different transition models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 64 T1D patients who transitioned to the adult outpatient clinic at Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. Patients were followed up between 2001 and 2022, completed their pediatric follow-up, and participated in the shift from pediatric to adult outpatient care. Demographic data, clinical and metabolic parameters before and after the transition, the presence of diabetic complications and comorbidities, and treatment modalities were analyzed. These patients were transferred to adult care with two different transition models: in model 1, the transition was performed in a single meeting, whereas in model 2, it was performed over a period of 4-6 months. Due to pandemic-related disruptions, a few patients were transferred following telephone consultations and were excluded from model comparisons. The differences between the outcomes of the transition models were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis (43.7% female, age at diagnosis 9.4±3.9 years). At their last pediatric visit, the participants had a mean age of 19.4 ± 1.2 years (range 16.6-21.9). The mean age at transfer to adult care was 20.2 ± 1.4 years (17.7-23.1), and the mean age at the most recent adult visit was 23.2 ± 4.2 years (18.4-39.5). The median time in adult care follow-up was 3.3 (range 0.3-20.9) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 24.1 ± 1.7 kg/m² at transition to 23.6 ± 3.5 kg/m² during adult follow-up. Although the mean BMI fell slightly, obesity prevalence rose from 1.6 % to 9.6 %, reflecting a right-shift in the BMI distribution. Annual routine diabetes-care visits decreased from 3.0 ± 0.9 visits per year during pediatric follow-up to 2.1 ± 1.8 visits per year in adult care (p=0.009). The mean HbA1c level was significantly lower in adults (8.9% vs. 8.3%; p=0.007). Total insulin doses were significantly higher at transition than at the last adult care visit (0.95 vs 0.75 IU/kg/day; p=0.009). Basal insulin ratio was higher in adulthood (43.1% vs. 52.8%; p<0.0001). The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in adult care was higher (4.7% vs. 12.5%, p=0.11). The frequency of autoimmune thyroiditis and coeliac disease did not differ between adult and pediatric care. Although the frequency of microvascular and macrovascular complications increased in adult care, there was no statistically significant variation in acute and chronic complications. There were no statistically significant differences in glycemic outcomes, insulin requirements, or complication rates between transition models 1 and 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that a structured transition process may support better glycemic control and improved treatment adaptation in T1D management regardless of the model whether it involves a single-session or a gradual model, HbA1c levels improved during adult care, along with reduced insulin doses and increased basal insulin ratios. However, no significant difference was found between the two structured transition models, emphasizing the need for individualized and supportive approaches during this process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-1-21\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2025.2025-1-21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1型糖尿病(T1D)需要终身管理,一个标准化的多学科支持过渡方案可以帮助缓解从儿科为重点的医疗保健向成人护理系统的转变。目的:我们的目的是评估可能影响T1DM患者转变期和转变后过程的社会人口统计学数据、临床特征和实验室参数,并比较两种不同转变模型的结果。方法:我们回顾性分析64例转至伊斯坦布尔大学伊斯坦布尔医学院成人门诊的T1D患者。患者在2001年至2022年期间随访,完成儿科随访,并参与从儿科到成人门诊护理的转变。分析转变前后的人口学资料、临床和代谢参数、糖尿病并发症和合并症的存在情况以及治疗方式。这些患者通过两种不同的过渡模式转移到成人护理:在模型1中,过渡是在一次会议中进行的,而在模型2中,过渡是在4-6个月的时间内进行的。由于与大流行有关的干扰,一些病人在电话咨询后被转移,并被排除在模型比较之外。本文还分析了不同过渡模型的结果之间的差异。结果:64例患者纳入分析,其中女性43.7%,诊断时年龄9.4±3.9岁。在他们最后一次儿科就诊时,参与者的平均年龄为19.4±1.2岁(16.6-21.9岁)。转入成人护理的平均年龄为20.2±1.4岁(17.7-23.1岁),最近一次成人就诊的平均年龄为23.2±4.2岁(18.4-39.5岁)。成人护理随访的中位时间为3.3年(0.3-20.9年)。平均体重指数(BMI)由过渡期的24.1±1.7 kg/m²降至成人随访期的23.6±3.5 kg/m²。虽然平均体重指数略有下降,但肥胖患病率从1.6%上升到9.6%,反映了体重指数分布的右移。每年常规糖尿病护理就诊次数从儿童随访时的每年3.0±0.9次减少到成人随访时的每年2.1±1.8次(p=0.009)。成人的平均HbA1c水平显著降低(8.9%比8.3%;p=0.007)。转换时的总胰岛素剂量显著高于最后一次成人护理访问时(0.95 vs 0.75 IU/kg/天;p=0.009)。结论:我们得出结论,无论是单次治疗还是渐进式治疗,结构化的过渡过程都可能支持更好的血糖控制和改善T1D治疗的适应,在成人护理期间,HbA1c水平得到改善,胰岛素剂量减少,基础胰岛素比率增加。然而,两种结构化过渡模型之间没有发现显着差异,强调在此过程中需要个性化和支持性方法。
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Transfer from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Single-Center Experience.
Introduction: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) necessitates lifelong management, and a standardized transition protocol with multidisciplinary support can help ease the shift from pediatric-focused healthcare to adult care systems.
Aim: Our objective was to assess the sociodemographic data, clinical features, and laboratory parameters that may influence the transition period and post-transition process among patients with T1DM and to compare results between two different transition models.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 64 T1D patients who transitioned to the adult outpatient clinic at Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine. Patients were followed up between 2001 and 2022, completed their pediatric follow-up, and participated in the shift from pediatric to adult outpatient care. Demographic data, clinical and metabolic parameters before and after the transition, the presence of diabetic complications and comorbidities, and treatment modalities were analyzed. These patients were transferred to adult care with two different transition models: in model 1, the transition was performed in a single meeting, whereas in model 2, it was performed over a period of 4-6 months. Due to pandemic-related disruptions, a few patients were transferred following telephone consultations and were excluded from model comparisons. The differences between the outcomes of the transition models were also examined.
Results: Sixty-four patients were included in the analysis (43.7% female, age at diagnosis 9.4±3.9 years). At their last pediatric visit, the participants had a mean age of 19.4 ± 1.2 years (range 16.6-21.9). The mean age at transfer to adult care was 20.2 ± 1.4 years (17.7-23.1), and the mean age at the most recent adult visit was 23.2 ± 4.2 years (18.4-39.5). The median time in adult care follow-up was 3.3 (range 0.3-20.9) years. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 24.1 ± 1.7 kg/m² at transition to 23.6 ± 3.5 kg/m² during adult follow-up. Although the mean BMI fell slightly, obesity prevalence rose from 1.6 % to 9.6 %, reflecting a right-shift in the BMI distribution. Annual routine diabetes-care visits decreased from 3.0 ± 0.9 visits per year during pediatric follow-up to 2.1 ± 1.8 visits per year in adult care (p=0.009). The mean HbA1c level was significantly lower in adults (8.9% vs. 8.3%; p=0.007). Total insulin doses were significantly higher at transition than at the last adult care visit (0.95 vs 0.75 IU/kg/day; p=0.009). Basal insulin ratio was higher in adulthood (43.1% vs. 52.8%; p<0.0001). The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in adult care was higher (4.7% vs. 12.5%, p=0.11). The frequency of autoimmune thyroiditis and coeliac disease did not differ between adult and pediatric care. Although the frequency of microvascular and macrovascular complications increased in adult care, there was no statistically significant variation in acute and chronic complications. There were no statistically significant differences in glycemic outcomes, insulin requirements, or complication rates between transition models 1 and 2.
Conclusion: We conclude that a structured transition process may support better glycemic control and improved treatment adaptation in T1D management regardless of the model whether it involves a single-session or a gradual model, HbA1c levels improved during adult care, along with reduced insulin doses and increased basal insulin ratios. However, no significant difference was found between the two structured transition models, emphasizing the need for individualized and supportive approaches during this process.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology (JCRPE) publishes original research articles, reviews, short communications, letters, case reports and other special features related to the field of pediatric endocrinology. JCRPE is published in English by the Turkish Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Society quarterly (March, June, September, December). The target audience is physicians, researchers and other healthcare professionals in all areas of pediatric endocrinology.