机器人辅助和腹腔镜辅助肛肠牵引治疗肛肠畸形的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Daiwei Zhu, Zebing Zheng, Chengyan Tang, Xingrong Xia, Yuan Gong, Lu Huang, Qing Du, Wankang Zhou, Zeping Li, Yu Liao, Yuanmei Liu, Zhu Jin
{"title":"机器人辅助和腹腔镜辅助肛肠牵引治疗肛肠畸形的比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Daiwei Zhu, Zebing Zheng, Chengyan Tang, Xingrong Xia, Yuan Gong, Lu Huang, Qing Du, Wankang Zhou, Zeping Li, Yu Liao, Yuanmei Liu, Zhu Jin","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12175-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted anorectal pull-through (RAARP) and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) in treating children with anorectal malformations (ARMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty five children with ARMs who underwent surgical treatment in our department between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: 27 cases in the RAARP group and 38 in the LAARP group. The collected data included age and weight at surgery, operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative complications and postoperative defecation function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in age at surgery, weight at surgery, operative time, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). the intraoperative blood loss in the RAARP group were significantly lower than that in the LAARP group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). The total hospitalization cost in the RAARP group were significantly higher than LAARP group (P < 0.05). The RAARP group demonstrated significantly better postoperative defecation function, including voluntary bowel control and soiling, compared to the LAARP group (P < 0.05), However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of constipation (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of RAARP in the treatment of intermediate/high-type anorectal malformations with rectourethral bulbar fistula demonstrates safety and efficacy, effectively reducing intraoperative blood loss while maintaining postoperative defecation function comparable to or better than LAARP, with satisfactory early-term outcomes.RAARP also represents a safe and feasible option for the treatment of low-type fistulous anorectal malformations, warranting consideration for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a single-center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Daiwei Zhu, Zebing Zheng, Chengyan Tang, Xingrong Xia, Yuan Gong, Lu Huang, Qing Du, Wankang Zhou, Zeping Li, Yu Liao, Yuanmei Liu, Zhu Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12175-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted anorectal pull-through (RAARP) and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) in treating children with anorectal malformations (ARMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty five children with ARMs who underwent surgical treatment in our department between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: 27 cases in the RAARP group and 38 in the LAARP group. The collected data included age and weight at surgery, operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative complications and postoperative defecation function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in age at surgery, weight at surgery, operative time, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). the intraoperative blood loss in the RAARP group were significantly lower than that in the LAARP group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). The total hospitalization cost in the RAARP group were significantly higher than LAARP group (P < 0.05). The RAARP group demonstrated significantly better postoperative defecation function, including voluntary bowel control and soiling, compared to the LAARP group (P < 0.05), However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of constipation (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of RAARP in the treatment of intermediate/high-type anorectal malformations with rectourethral bulbar fistula demonstrates safety and efficacy, effectively reducing intraoperative blood loss while maintaining postoperative defecation function comparable to or better than LAARP, with satisfactory early-term outcomes.RAARP also represents a safe and feasible option for the treatment of low-type fistulous anorectal malformations, warranting consideration for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12175-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12175-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本研究中,我们旨在比较机器人辅助肛肠牵引(RAARP)和腹腔镜辅助肛肠牵引(LAARP)治疗儿童肛肠畸形(ARMs)的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2018年至2023年在我科接受手术治疗的65例ARMs患儿。根据手术入路将患者分为两组:RAARP组27例,LAARP组38例。收集的数据包括手术时的年龄和体重、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、术后并发症和术后排便功能。结果:两组患者手术年龄、手术体重、手术时间、术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。RAARP组术中出血量显著低于LAARP组(P < 0.05)。RAARP组总住院费用显著高于LAARP组(P < 0.05)。结论:应用RAARP治疗中、高类型肛肠畸形伴直肠尿道球瘘安全有效,术中出血量减少,术后排便功能维持与LAARP相当或更好,早期效果满意。RAARP也是治疗低型瘘性肛肠畸形的一种安全可行的选择,值得临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations: a single-center retrospective study.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of robotic-assisted anorectal pull-through (RAARP) and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through (LAARP) in treating children with anorectal malformations (ARMs).

Methods: Sixty five children with ARMs who underwent surgical treatment in our department between 2018 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical approach: 27 cases in the RAARP group and 38 in the LAARP group. The collected data included age and weight at surgery, operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay,postoperative complications and postoperative defecation function.

Results: No significant differences were observed in age at surgery, weight at surgery, operative time, or postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). the intraoperative blood loss in the RAARP group were significantly lower than that in the LAARP group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). The total hospitalization cost in the RAARP group were significantly higher than LAARP group (P < 0.05). The RAARP group demonstrated significantly better postoperative defecation function, including voluntary bowel control and soiling, compared to the LAARP group (P < 0.05), However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of constipation (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The application of RAARP in the treatment of intermediate/high-type anorectal malformations with rectourethral bulbar fistula demonstrates safety and efficacy, effectively reducing intraoperative blood loss while maintaining postoperative defecation function comparable to or better than LAARP, with satisfactory early-term outcomes.RAARP also represents a safe and feasible option for the treatment of low-type fistulous anorectal malformations, warranting consideration for clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信