Alexandru Guranda, Erdem Güresir, Arne Mathias Ruder, Frank Anton Giordano, Johannes Wach
{"title":"手术切除脑转移瘤的腔内放疗:包括术中放疗(IORT)和近距离放疗(IBT)个体患者数据荟萃分析的综合分析。","authors":"Alexandru Guranda, Erdem Güresir, Arne Mathias Ruder, Frank Anton Giordano, Johannes Wach","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard approach for brain metastases (BM). Intracavitary radiotherapy techniques-namely intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)-have gained attention as alternatives to stereotactic radiotherapy, potentially reducing neurotoxicity and treatment delays. However, robust comparative data remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic meta-analysis including both conventional and reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from studies reporting outcomes after intracavitary radiotherapy post-BM resection. Primary endpoint was local control rate (LCR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). IPD was reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival and incidence outcomes were pooled using random-effects models in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies with 858 patients were analyzed. The 1-year LCR was 96% (95% CI: 94-98%) for IORT and 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) for IBT. Median OS in patients who underwent IORT was 39.1 months (95% CI: 22.0-59.5), and 15.9 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.9) in whose who underwent IBT, respectively (p = 0.004; HR 0.64). IORT was associated with lower RN (4% vs. 7%) and LMD (6% vs. 9%). The 1-year DBC rate was higher for IORT (57%) than IBT (48%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intracavitary radiotherapy yields excellent local control after BM resection. This IPD meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive evidence to date and supports further prospective evaluation of IORT in neuro-oncological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"907-919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-cavitary radiotherapy for surgically resected brain metastases: a comprehensive analysis including an individual patient data meta-analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT).\",\"authors\":\"Alexandru Guranda, Erdem Güresir, Arne Mathias Ruder, Frank Anton Giordano, Johannes Wach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard approach for brain metastases (BM). Intracavitary radiotherapy techniques-namely intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)-have gained attention as alternatives to stereotactic radiotherapy, potentially reducing neurotoxicity and treatment delays. However, robust comparative data remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic meta-analysis including both conventional and reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from studies reporting outcomes after intracavitary radiotherapy post-BM resection. Primary endpoint was local control rate (LCR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). IPD was reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival and incidence outcomes were pooled using random-effects models in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies with 858 patients were analyzed. The 1-year LCR was 96% (95% CI: 94-98%) for IORT and 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) for IBT. Median OS in patients who underwent IORT was 39.1 months (95% CI: 22.0-59.5), and 15.9 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.9) in whose who underwent IBT, respectively (p = 0.004; HR 0.64). IORT was associated with lower RN (4% vs. 7%) and LMD (6% vs. 9%). The 1-year DBC rate was higher for IORT (57%) than IBT (48%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intracavitary radiotherapy yields excellent local control after BM resection. This IPD meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive evidence to date and supports further prospective evaluation of IORT in neuro-oncological care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"907-919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511155/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intra-cavitary radiotherapy for surgically resected brain metastases: a comprehensive analysis including an individual patient data meta-analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT).
Background: Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard approach for brain metastases (BM). Intracavitary radiotherapy techniques-namely intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)-have gained attention as alternatives to stereotactic radiotherapy, potentially reducing neurotoxicity and treatment delays. However, robust comparative data remain scarce.
Methods: We performed a systematic meta-analysis including both conventional and reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from studies reporting outcomes after intracavitary radiotherapy post-BM resection. Primary endpoint was local control rate (LCR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). IPD was reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival and incidence outcomes were pooled using random-effects models in R.
Results: Twenty-three studies with 858 patients were analyzed. The 1-year LCR was 96% (95% CI: 94-98%) for IORT and 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) for IBT. Median OS in patients who underwent IORT was 39.1 months (95% CI: 22.0-59.5), and 15.9 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.9) in whose who underwent IBT, respectively (p = 0.004; HR 0.64). IORT was associated with lower RN (4% vs. 7%) and LMD (6% vs. 9%). The 1-year DBC rate was higher for IORT (57%) than IBT (48%).
Conclusions: Intracavitary radiotherapy yields excellent local control after BM resection. This IPD meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive evidence to date and supports further prospective evaluation of IORT in neuro-oncological care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.