手术切除脑转移瘤的腔内放疗:包括术中放疗(IORT)和近距离放疗(IBT)个体患者数据荟萃分析的综合分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-17 DOI:10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2
Alexandru Guranda, Erdem Güresir, Arne Mathias Ruder, Frank Anton Giordano, Johannes Wach
{"title":"手术切除脑转移瘤的腔内放疗:包括术中放疗(IORT)和近距离放疗(IBT)个体患者数据荟萃分析的综合分析。","authors":"Alexandru Guranda, Erdem Güresir, Arne Mathias Ruder, Frank Anton Giordano, Johannes Wach","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard approach for brain metastases (BM). Intracavitary radiotherapy techniques-namely intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)-have gained attention as alternatives to stereotactic radiotherapy, potentially reducing neurotoxicity and treatment delays. However, robust comparative data remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic meta-analysis including both conventional and reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from studies reporting outcomes after intracavitary radiotherapy post-BM resection. Primary endpoint was local control rate (LCR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). IPD was reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival and incidence outcomes were pooled using random-effects models in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies with 858 patients were analyzed. The 1-year LCR was 96% (95% CI: 94-98%) for IORT and 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) for IBT. Median OS in patients who underwent IORT was 39.1 months (95% CI: 22.0-59.5), and 15.9 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.9) in whose who underwent IBT, respectively (p = 0.004; HR 0.64). IORT was associated with lower RN (4% vs. 7%) and LMD (6% vs. 9%). The 1-year DBC rate was higher for IORT (57%) than IBT (48%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intracavitary radiotherapy yields excellent local control after BM resection. This IPD meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive evidence to date and supports further prospective evaluation of IORT in neuro-oncological care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"907-919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-cavitary radiotherapy for surgically resected brain metastases: a comprehensive analysis including an individual patient data meta-analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT).\",\"authors\":\"Alexandru Guranda, Erdem Güresir, Arne Mathias Ruder, Frank Anton Giordano, Johannes Wach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard approach for brain metastases (BM). Intracavitary radiotherapy techniques-namely intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)-have gained attention as alternatives to stereotactic radiotherapy, potentially reducing neurotoxicity and treatment delays. However, robust comparative data remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic meta-analysis including both conventional and reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from studies reporting outcomes after intracavitary radiotherapy post-BM resection. Primary endpoint was local control rate (LCR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). IPD was reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival and incidence outcomes were pooled using random-effects models in R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies with 858 patients were analyzed. The 1-year LCR was 96% (95% CI: 94-98%) for IORT and 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) for IBT. Median OS in patients who underwent IORT was 39.1 months (95% CI: 22.0-59.5), and 15.9 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.9) in whose who underwent IBT, respectively (p = 0.004; HR 0.64). IORT was associated with lower RN (4% vs. 7%) and LMD (6% vs. 9%). The 1-year DBC rate was higher for IORT (57%) than IBT (48%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intracavitary radiotherapy yields excellent local control after BM resection. This IPD meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive evidence to date and supports further prospective evaluation of IORT in neuro-oncological care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"907-919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511155/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05227-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术切除加辅助放疗是脑转移瘤(BM)的标准治疗方法。腔内放疗技术-即术中放疗(IORT)和近距离放疗(IBT)-作为立体定向放疗的替代方案已引起人们的关注,可能减少神经毒性和治疗延迟。然而,可靠的比较数据仍然很少。方法:我们进行了系统的荟萃分析,包括传统和重建的个体患者数据(IPD),这些数据来自报告脑脊髓瘤切除术后腔内放疗结果的研究。主要终点为局部控制率(LCR);次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、远端脑控制(DBC)、放射性坏死(RN)和轻脑膜疾病(LMD)。IPD由已发表的Kaplan-Meier曲线重建。采用随机效应模型对生存率和发病率结果进行汇总。结果:共分析了23项研究,共858例患者。IORT的1年LCR为96% (95% CI: 94-98%), IBT的1年LCR为95% (95% CI: 92-97%)。接受IORT的患者中位OS为39.1个月(95% CI: 22.0-59.5),接受IBT的患者中位OS为15.9个月(95% CI: 12.6-19.9),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.004; HR 0.64)。IORT与较低的RN(4%对7%)和LMD(6%对9%)相关。1年DBC率IORT(57%)高于IBT(48%)。结论:脑基瘤切除术后,腔内放疗可获得良好的局部控制。这项IPD荟萃分析提供了迄今为止最全面的证据,并支持进一步对IORT在神经肿瘤治疗中的前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-cavitary radiotherapy for surgically resected brain metastases: a comprehensive analysis including an individual patient data meta-analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT).

Background: Surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard approach for brain metastases (BM). Intracavitary radiotherapy techniques-namely intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)-have gained attention as alternatives to stereotactic radiotherapy, potentially reducing neurotoxicity and treatment delays. However, robust comparative data remain scarce.

Methods: We performed a systematic meta-analysis including both conventional and reconstructed individual patient data (IPD) from studies reporting outcomes after intracavitary radiotherapy post-BM resection. Primary endpoint was local control rate (LCR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant brain control (DBC), radiation necrosis (RN), and leptomeningeal disease (LMD). IPD was reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Survival and incidence outcomes were pooled using random-effects models in R.

Results: Twenty-three studies with 858 patients were analyzed. The 1-year LCR was 96% (95% CI: 94-98%) for IORT and 95% (95% CI: 92-97%) for IBT. Median OS in patients who underwent IORT was 39.1 months (95% CI: 22.0-59.5), and 15.9 months (95% CI: 12.6-19.9) in whose who underwent IBT, respectively (p = 0.004; HR 0.64). IORT was associated with lower RN (4% vs. 7%) and LMD (6% vs. 9%). The 1-year DBC rate was higher for IORT (57%) than IBT (48%).

Conclusions: Intracavitary radiotherapy yields excellent local control after BM resection. This IPD meta-analysis provides the most comprehensive evidence to date and supports further prospective evaluation of IORT in neuro-oncological care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信