超声引导下肥胖患者针头减压部位的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Furkan Alkan, Volkan Ülker, Şükrü Koçkan, Hikmet Kılınç, Şahin Kaymaz Seher, Asim Enes Ozbek, Hüseyin Cahit Halhallı
{"title":"超声引导下肥胖患者针头减压部位的比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Furkan Alkan, Volkan Ülker, Şükrü Koçkan, Hikmet Kılınç, Şahin Kaymaz Seher, Asim Enes Ozbek, Hüseyin Cahit Halhallı","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04110-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable site-second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (2nd ICS in the MCL) or fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (5th ICS in the MAL)-by comparing skin-to-pleura distances using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Skin-to-pleura distance measurements at the right 2nd ICS-MCL and the right 5th ICS in the MAL, assessed by three different operators. The primary outcome was to compare the skin-to-pleura distances at the 2nd ICS in the MCL and the 5th ICS in the MAL using POCUS in volunteers with a BMI over 30. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the consistency of different operators in determining the most appropriate site for needle decompression in the management of tension pneumothorax among healthy volunteers with a BMI over 30, using bedside ultrasonography. A total of ninety-one volunteers were enrolled. The skin-to-pleura distance at the 5th ICS in the MAL was found to be statistically significantly greater than that at the 2nd ICS in the MCL in the measurements performed by each operator (Operator 1: p = 0.016; Operator 2: p = 0.002; Operator 3: p = 0.006). The MCL measurements obtained by all three operators demonstrated statistically significant agreement. In obese patients, the 2nd ICS-MCL may be considered the preferred site for needle decompression. Nevertheless, individualized assessment of both sites using bedside ultrasonography is recommended to optimize procedural success and reduce complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound-guided comparison of needle decompression sites in obese patients: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Furkan Alkan, Volkan Ülker, Şükrü Koçkan, Hikmet Kılınç, Şahin Kaymaz Seher, Asim Enes Ozbek, Hüseyin Cahit Halhallı\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04110-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The optimal site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable site-second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (2nd ICS in the MCL) or fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (5th ICS in the MAL)-by comparing skin-to-pleura distances using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Skin-to-pleura distance measurements at the right 2nd ICS-MCL and the right 5th ICS in the MAL, assessed by three different operators. The primary outcome was to compare the skin-to-pleura distances at the 2nd ICS in the MCL and the 5th ICS in the MAL using POCUS in volunteers with a BMI over 30. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the consistency of different operators in determining the most appropriate site for needle decompression in the management of tension pneumothorax among healthy volunteers with a BMI over 30, using bedside ultrasonography. A total of ninety-one volunteers were enrolled. The skin-to-pleura distance at the 5th ICS in the MAL was found to be statistically significantly greater than that at the 2nd ICS in the MCL in the measurements performed by each operator (Operator 1: p = 0.016; Operator 2: p = 0.002; Operator 3: p = 0.006). The MCL measurements obtained by all three operators demonstrated statistically significant agreement. In obese patients, the 2nd ICS-MCL may be considered the preferred site for needle decompression. Nevertheless, individualized assessment of both sites using bedside ultrasonography is recommended to optimize procedural success and reduce complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04110-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04110-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于体重指数(BMI)超过30的紧张性气胸患者,针刺减压的最佳部位仍有争议。本研究旨在通过使用即时超声(POCUS)比较皮肤到胸膜的距离,确定最合适的位置——锁骨中线的第二肋间隙(MCL的第2 ICS)或腋中线的第五肋间隙(MAL的第5 ICS)。皮肤到胸膜的距离测量在右侧第2 ICS- mcl和右侧第5 ICS- MAL,由三个不同的操作员评估。主要结果是在BMI超过30的志愿者中,使用POCUS比较MCL第2个ICS和MAL第5个ICS的皮肤到胸膜距离。次要结果是评价不同操作人员在BMI超过30的健康志愿者中确定最合适的针减压部位时的一致性,使用床边超声检查。共有91名志愿者被招募。各操作人员测量MAL第5个ICS处皮肤到胸膜的距离均明显大于MCL第2个ICS处皮肤到胸膜的距离(操作1:p = 0.016;操作2:p = 0.002;操作3:p = 0.006)。三家运营商获得的MCL测量结果在统计上具有显著的一致性。在肥胖患者中,第二ICS-MCL可能被认为是针刺减压的首选部位。然而,建议使用床边超声对两个部位进行个性化评估,以优化手术成功率并减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound-guided comparison of needle decompression sites in obese patients: a prospective observational study.

The optimal site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable site-second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (2nd ICS in the MCL) or fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (5th ICS in the MAL)-by comparing skin-to-pleura distances using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Skin-to-pleura distance measurements at the right 2nd ICS-MCL and the right 5th ICS in the MAL, assessed by three different operators. The primary outcome was to compare the skin-to-pleura distances at the 2nd ICS in the MCL and the 5th ICS in the MAL using POCUS in volunteers with a BMI over 30. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the consistency of different operators in determining the most appropriate site for needle decompression in the management of tension pneumothorax among healthy volunteers with a BMI over 30, using bedside ultrasonography. A total of ninety-one volunteers were enrolled. The skin-to-pleura distance at the 5th ICS in the MAL was found to be statistically significantly greater than that at the 2nd ICS in the MCL in the measurements performed by each operator (Operator 1: p = 0.016; Operator 2: p = 0.002; Operator 3: p = 0.006). The MCL measurements obtained by all three operators demonstrated statistically significant agreement. In obese patients, the 2nd ICS-MCL may be considered the preferred site for needle decompression. Nevertheless, individualized assessment of both sites using bedside ultrasonography is recommended to optimize procedural success and reduce complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信