Omar Elshaarawy, Shami Hasan M Alquzi, Felix Piecha, Vanessa Rausch, Johannes Mueller, Sebastian Mueller
{"title":"肝硬化大鼠肝脾僵硬的药理调节。","authors":"Omar Elshaarawy, Shami Hasan M Alquzi, Felix Piecha, Vanessa Rausch, Johannes Mueller, Sebastian Mueller","doi":"10.2147/HMER.S541039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Liver stiffness (LS) assesses liver fibrosis, while spleen stiffness (SS) is a promising marker for portal hypertension (PH), reflecting blood flow and vascular resistance. However, the response of LS and SS to vasoactive drugs is unclear. This study evaluates the effects of various PH-lowering drugs on LS and SS in a rat cirrhosis model.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, cirrhosis was induced in 43 male Wistar rats (8 weeks old) via intraperitoneal thioacetamide (TAA) injections (200 mg/kg, twice weekly for six weeks). Rats were divided into six groups: control (sodium chloride), metoprolol, udenafil, enalapril, terlipressin, and carvedilol. LS and SS were measured using μFibroscan. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and portal vein pressure (PVP) were continuously monitored. Drugs were administered systemically, with data collected at 0, 15, and 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TAA-treated rats exhibited significantly higher LS and SS compared to controls (22.1 vs 4.2 kPa and 53.7 vs 27.7 kPa; P < 0.001). Changes in LS and SS correlated with PVP (r = 0.670 for LS and r = 0.867 for SS; P < 0.01). Metoprolol, udenafil, enalapril, and carvedilol significantly reduced PVP (22-34%, P < 0.05), accompanied by decreases in LS and SS (13-37%, P < 0.05). Terlipressin did not reduce LS or SS, likely due to opposing effects of increased MAP and reduced PVP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, combined LS and SS measurements may provide valuable non-invasive insights into patient responses and adherence to PH-lowering therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12917,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"91-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological Modulation of Liver and Spleen Stiffness in a Cirrhotic Rat Model.\",\"authors\":\"Omar Elshaarawy, Shami Hasan M Alquzi, Felix Piecha, Vanessa Rausch, Johannes Mueller, Sebastian Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/HMER.S541039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Liver stiffness (LS) assesses liver fibrosis, while spleen stiffness (SS) is a promising marker for portal hypertension (PH), reflecting blood flow and vascular resistance. However, the response of LS and SS to vasoactive drugs is unclear. This study evaluates the effects of various PH-lowering drugs on LS and SS in a rat cirrhosis model.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this study, cirrhosis was induced in 43 male Wistar rats (8 weeks old) via intraperitoneal thioacetamide (TAA) injections (200 mg/kg, twice weekly for six weeks). Rats were divided into six groups: control (sodium chloride), metoprolol, udenafil, enalapril, terlipressin, and carvedilol. LS and SS were measured using μFibroscan. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and portal vein pressure (PVP) were continuously monitored. Drugs were administered systemically, with data collected at 0, 15, and 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TAA-treated rats exhibited significantly higher LS and SS compared to controls (22.1 vs 4.2 kPa and 53.7 vs 27.7 kPa; P < 0.001). Changes in LS and SS correlated with PVP (r = 0.670 for LS and r = 0.867 for SS; P < 0.01). Metoprolol, udenafil, enalapril, and carvedilol significantly reduced PVP (22-34%, P < 0.05), accompanied by decreases in LS and SS (13-37%, P < 0.05). Terlipressin did not reduce LS or SS, likely due to opposing effects of increased MAP and reduced PVP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, combined LS and SS measurements may provide valuable non-invasive insights into patient responses and adherence to PH-lowering therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"91-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435505/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S541039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Medicine : Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S541039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:肝硬度(LS)评估肝纤维化,而脾硬度(SS)是门脉高压(PH)的一个有希望的标志物,反映血流和血管阻力。然而,LS和SS对血管活性药物的反应尚不清楚。本研究评估了各种降ph药物对肝硬化大鼠LS和SS的影响。实验对象和方法:43只雄性Wistar大鼠(8周龄)腹腔注射硫乙酰胺(TAA) (200mg /kg,每周2次,连续6周)诱导肝硬化。大鼠分为6组:对照组(氯化钠)、美托洛尔组、乌地那非组、依那普利组、特利加压素组、卡维地洛组。采用μFibroscan测定LS和SS。连续监测平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、门静脉压(PVP)。系统给药,在0、15和30分钟收集数据。结果:taa处理大鼠的LS和SS明显高于对照组(22.1 vs 4.2 kPa和53.7 vs 27.7 kPa; P < 0.001)。LS和SS的变化与PVP相关(LS r = 0.670, SS r = 0.867, P < 0.01)。美托洛尔、udenafil、依那普利和卡维地洛显著降低PVP (22-34%, P < 0.05),同时降低LS和SS (13-37%, P < 0.05)。特利加压素没有降低LS或SS,可能是由于MAP增加和PVP减少的相反作用。结论:总之,联合LS和SS测量可以提供有价值的非侵入性见解,以了解患者对降低ph治疗的反应和依从性。
Pharmacological Modulation of Liver and Spleen Stiffness in a Cirrhotic Rat Model.
Purpose: Liver stiffness (LS) assesses liver fibrosis, while spleen stiffness (SS) is a promising marker for portal hypertension (PH), reflecting blood flow and vascular resistance. However, the response of LS and SS to vasoactive drugs is unclear. This study evaluates the effects of various PH-lowering drugs on LS and SS in a rat cirrhosis model.
Patients and methods: In this study, cirrhosis was induced in 43 male Wistar rats (8 weeks old) via intraperitoneal thioacetamide (TAA) injections (200 mg/kg, twice weekly for six weeks). Rats were divided into six groups: control (sodium chloride), metoprolol, udenafil, enalapril, terlipressin, and carvedilol. LS and SS were measured using μFibroscan. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and portal vein pressure (PVP) were continuously monitored. Drugs were administered systemically, with data collected at 0, 15, and 30 minutes.
Results: TAA-treated rats exhibited significantly higher LS and SS compared to controls (22.1 vs 4.2 kPa and 53.7 vs 27.7 kPa; P < 0.001). Changes in LS and SS correlated with PVP (r = 0.670 for LS and r = 0.867 for SS; P < 0.01). Metoprolol, udenafil, enalapril, and carvedilol significantly reduced PVP (22-34%, P < 0.05), accompanied by decreases in LS and SS (13-37%, P < 0.05). Terlipressin did not reduce LS or SS, likely due to opposing effects of increased MAP and reduced PVP.
Conclusion: In conclusion, combined LS and SS measurements may provide valuable non-invasive insights into patient responses and adherence to PH-lowering therapies.
期刊介绍:
Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. Publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric hepatology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of hepatic disease Investigation and treatment of hepatic disease Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of hepatic disease Although the main focus of the journal is to publish research and clinical results in humans; preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they will shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies. Issues of patient safety and quality of care will also be considered. As of 1st April 2019, Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.