基于ASPECTS框架的放射组学模型的开发和验证,利用CT成像预测恶性脑水肿。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
LiJun Huang , XiaoQuan Xu , Bing Tian , AnYu Liao , LiYing Wang , Xi Shen , ZeHong Cao , XiaoYu Liu , Shanshan Lu , JiaNan Li , Feng Shi , ChangSheng Zhou , LongJiang Zhang , FeiYun Wu , WuSheng Zhu , Xing Wei , XiaoQing Cheng , GuangMing Lu
{"title":"基于ASPECTS框架的放射组学模型的开发和验证,利用CT成像预测恶性脑水肿。","authors":"LiJun Huang ,&nbsp;XiaoQuan Xu ,&nbsp;Bing Tian ,&nbsp;AnYu Liao ,&nbsp;LiYing Wang ,&nbsp;Xi Shen ,&nbsp;ZeHong Cao ,&nbsp;XiaoYu Liu ,&nbsp;Shanshan Lu ,&nbsp;JiaNan Li ,&nbsp;Feng Shi ,&nbsp;ChangSheng Zhou ,&nbsp;LongJiang Zhang ,&nbsp;FeiYun Wu ,&nbsp;WuSheng Zhu ,&nbsp;Xing Wei ,&nbsp;XiaoQing Cheng ,&nbsp;GuangMing Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Accurate delineation of the infarct region on acute-phase Computed Tomography (CT) remains challenging, and radiomics applications in stroke are limited. We aimed to develop and validate a multimodal prediction model for malignant cerebral edema (MCE) using clinical and radiomic features extracted based on the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) framework, eliminating the need for manual infarct segmentation.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from five stroke centers who underwent Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Radiomic features were extracted from ASPECTS regions. Clinical, imaging-alone, and fused models were developed using machine learning. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret feature contributions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 708 patients were included (median age: 67 years; interquartile range (IQR): 60–76; 448 men, 63.3 %). In the training cohort, the fused model (AUC = 0.91, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.88–0.95) outperformed the clinical (AUC = 0.72, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.66–0.78, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and CTA_Features (AUC = 0.83, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.79–0.88, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) models. In the internal validation cohort, the fused model (AUC = 0.78, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.70–0.87) outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.68, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.59–0.77, <em>p</em> = 0.030). In the external validation, the fused model (AUC = 0.88, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.82–0.94) outperformed the clinical (AUC = 0.71, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.59–0.83, <em>p</em> = 0.010) and CT_Features (AUC = 0.70, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.56–0.85, <em>p</em> = 0.012) models. SHAP analysis identified ASPECTS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and collateral score (CS) as top predictors. The fused model demonstrated the highest specificity (82.5 %) and accuracy (78.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fused model integrating clinical, radiological, and radiomic features extracted using the ASPECTS framework, demonstrated superior and generalizable predictive performance for early MCE prediction. As it uses routinely acquired baseline NCCT and CTA with readily available admission variables and avoids manual segmentation through an ASPECTS-based framework, it can be integrated into clinical workflows to enable rapid and consistent MCE risk estimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112410"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a radiomics model based on the ASPECTS framework using CT imaging for predicting malignant cerebral edema\",\"authors\":\"LiJun Huang ,&nbsp;XiaoQuan Xu ,&nbsp;Bing Tian ,&nbsp;AnYu Liao ,&nbsp;LiYing Wang ,&nbsp;Xi Shen ,&nbsp;ZeHong Cao ,&nbsp;XiaoYu Liu ,&nbsp;Shanshan Lu ,&nbsp;JiaNan Li ,&nbsp;Feng Shi ,&nbsp;ChangSheng Zhou ,&nbsp;LongJiang Zhang ,&nbsp;FeiYun Wu ,&nbsp;WuSheng Zhu ,&nbsp;Xing Wei ,&nbsp;XiaoQing Cheng ,&nbsp;GuangMing Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Accurate delineation of the infarct region on acute-phase Computed Tomography (CT) remains challenging, and radiomics applications in stroke are limited. We aimed to develop and validate a multimodal prediction model for malignant cerebral edema (MCE) using clinical and radiomic features extracted based on the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) framework, eliminating the need for manual infarct segmentation.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from five stroke centers who underwent Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Radiomic features were extracted from ASPECTS regions. Clinical, imaging-alone, and fused models were developed using machine learning. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret feature contributions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 708 patients were included (median age: 67 years; interquartile range (IQR): 60–76; 448 men, 63.3 %). In the training cohort, the fused model (AUC = 0.91, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.88–0.95) outperformed the clinical (AUC = 0.72, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.66–0.78, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and CTA_Features (AUC = 0.83, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.79–0.88, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) models. In the internal validation cohort, the fused model (AUC = 0.78, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.70–0.87) outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.68, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.59–0.77, <em>p</em> = 0.030). In the external validation, the fused model (AUC = 0.88, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.82–0.94) outperformed the clinical (AUC = 0.71, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.59–0.83, <em>p</em> = 0.010) and CT_Features (AUC = 0.70, 95 %<em>CI</em>: 0.56–0.85, <em>p</em> = 0.012) models. SHAP analysis identified ASPECTS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and collateral score (CS) as top predictors. The fused model demonstrated the highest specificity (82.5 %) and accuracy (78.3 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The fused model integrating clinical, radiological, and radiomic features extracted using the ASPECTS framework, demonstrated superior and generalizable predictive performance for early MCE prediction. As it uses routinely acquired baseline NCCT and CTA with readily available admission variables and avoids manual segmentation through an ASPECTS-based framework, it can be integrated into clinical workflows to enable rapid and consistent MCE risk estimation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"192 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25004966\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25004966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性期计算机断层扫描(CT)准确描绘梗死区域仍然具有挑战性,放射组学在中风中的应用受到限制。我们的目的是开发和验证一种多模式的恶性脑水肿(MCE)预测模型,该模型使用基于阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期计算机断层扫描评分(ASPECTS)框架提取的临床和放射学特征,从而消除了手动脑梗死分割的需要。方法:这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了来自五个卒中中心的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者,他们接受了非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)和计算机断层血管造影(CTA)。从ASPECTS区域提取放射性特征。使用机器学习开发临床、单独成像和融合模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分析、准确度、校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估模型的性能。采用Shapley加性解释(SHAP)来解释特征贡献。结果:共纳入708例患者(中位年龄:67岁;四分位数间距(IQR): 60-76;男性448人,63.3%)。在训练队列中,融合模型(AUC = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.95)优于临床模型(AUC = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66-0.78, p)。结论:融合模型综合了使用ASPECTS框架提取的临床、放射学和放射学特征,在早期MCE预测中表现出优越且可推广的预测性能。由于它使用常规获得的基线NCCT和CTA以及容易获得的入院变量,并且通过基于aspect的框架避免了人工分割,因此可以集成到临床工作流程中,从而实现快速和一致的MCE风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a radiomics model based on the ASPECTS framework using CT imaging for predicting malignant cerebral edema

Purpose

Accurate delineation of the infarct region on acute-phase Computed Tomography (CT) remains challenging, and radiomics applications in stroke are limited. We aimed to develop and validate a multimodal prediction model for malignant cerebral edema (MCE) using clinical and radiomic features extracted based on the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) framework, eliminating the need for manual infarct segmentation.

Method

This multicenter retrospective study included patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from five stroke centers who underwent Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Radiomic features were extracted from ASPECTS regions. Clinical, imaging-alone, and fused models were developed using machine learning. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis, accuracy, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret feature contributions.

Results

A total of 708 patients were included (median age: 67 years; interquartile range (IQR): 60–76; 448 men, 63.3 %). In the training cohort, the fused model (AUC = 0.91, 95 %CI: 0.88–0.95) outperformed the clinical (AUC = 0.72, 95 %CI: 0.66–0.78, p < 0.001) and CTA_Features (AUC = 0.83, 95 %CI: 0.79–0.88, p < 0.001) models. In the internal validation cohort, the fused model (AUC = 0.78, 95 %CI: 0.70–0.87) outperformed the clinical model (AUC = 0.68, 95 %CI: 0.59–0.77, p = 0.030). In the external validation, the fused model (AUC = 0.88, 95 %CI: 0.82–0.94) outperformed the clinical (AUC = 0.71, 95 %CI: 0.59–0.83, p = 0.010) and CT_Features (AUC = 0.70, 95 %CI: 0.56–0.85, p = 0.012) models. SHAP analysis identified ASPECTS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and collateral score (CS) as top predictors. The fused model demonstrated the highest specificity (82.5 %) and accuracy (78.3 %).

Conclusions

The fused model integrating clinical, radiological, and radiomic features extracted using the ASPECTS framework, demonstrated superior and generalizable predictive performance for early MCE prediction. As it uses routinely acquired baseline NCCT and CTA with readily available admission variables and avoids manual segmentation through an ASPECTS-based framework, it can be integrated into clinical workflows to enable rapid and consistent MCE risk estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信