{"title":"克罗地亚家族性高胆固醇血症筛查项目初期测定的总胆固醇结果分析:一项试点研究。","authors":"Gordana Juričić, Antonija Perović, Jasminka Matica, Kornelija Perković-Radojković, Vesna Horvat, Dario Mandić, Tamara Devčić-Ljubić, Zdravka Doljanin, Irena Užović, Katarina Jedrejčić, Sonja Podolar, Nena Peran, Željka Severinac, Ines Kelava, Ivanka Maldini, Marijan Oršulić, Krešimir Kuleš","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2023, Croatia implemented a screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) targeting children entering the first grade of primary school. The program is based on total cholesterol (TC) concentration measurements. This pilot study aimed to assess and compare TC results obtained using different analytical platforms during the program's initial phase (2023-2024).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from laboratories across Croatia were analyzed. Results covered the following analyzers: Beckman Coulter AU (BC), Abbott Alinity/Architect c (AA), Roche Cobas c (RC) and Siemens Atellica CH (SA). Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests using the program's cut-off values. Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analyses were used to assess differences in a direct comparison study of 40 samples. To reduce variability, TC values were also expressed as multiples of the median (MoM), calculated separately for each platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 17,694 children. Median TC values (IQR) differed significantly across platforms: BC (4.3 [3.8-4.7] mmol/L), AA (4.1 [3.7-4.5]), RC (4.1 [3.7-4.5]), and SA (4.0 [3.6-4.4]); p<0.001. BC and SA results differed significantly from all other platforms, while no significant difference was found between RC and AA. The distribution of TC results also varied significantly (p<0.001). In the comparison study, all platforms showed statistically significant differences (p<0.001). In contrast, MoM values showed no statistically significant differences between analyzers (p=0.106) or in distribution when applying various MoM-based cut-offs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although variations in TC measurements across platforms are small, they are statistically significant and affect FH classification. MoM normalization may support harmonization in future screening protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of total cholesterol results measured in the initial period of the Croatian screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Gordana Juričić, Antonija Perović, Jasminka Matica, Kornelija Perković-Radojković, Vesna Horvat, Dario Mandić, Tamara Devčić-Ljubić, Zdravka Doljanin, Irena Užović, Katarina Jedrejčić, Sonja Podolar, Nena Peran, Željka Severinac, Ines Kelava, Ivanka Maldini, Marijan Oršulić, Krešimir Kuleš\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2023, Croatia implemented a screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) targeting children entering the first grade of primary school. The program is based on total cholesterol (TC) concentration measurements. This pilot study aimed to assess and compare TC results obtained using different analytical platforms during the program's initial phase (2023-2024).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from laboratories across Croatia were analyzed. Results covered the following analyzers: Beckman Coulter AU (BC), Abbott Alinity/Architect c (AA), Roche Cobas c (RC) and Siemens Atellica CH (SA). Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests using the program's cut-off values. Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analyses were used to assess differences in a direct comparison study of 40 samples. To reduce variability, TC values were also expressed as multiples of the median (MoM), calculated separately for each platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 17,694 children. Median TC values (IQR) differed significantly across platforms: BC (4.3 [3.8-4.7] mmol/L), AA (4.1 [3.7-4.5]), RC (4.1 [3.7-4.5]), and SA (4.0 [3.6-4.4]); p<0.001. BC and SA results differed significantly from all other platforms, while no significant difference was found between RC and AA. The distribution of TC results also varied significantly (p<0.001). In the comparison study, all platforms showed statistically significant differences (p<0.001). In contrast, MoM values showed no statistically significant differences between analyzers (p=0.106) or in distribution when applying various MoM-based cut-offs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although variations in TC measurements across platforms are small, they are statistically significant and affect FH classification. MoM normalization may support harmonization in future screening protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0536\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2023年,克罗地亚实施了一项针对小学一年级儿童的家族性高胆固醇血症(FH)筛查计划。该程序是基于总胆固醇(TC)浓度测量。该试点研究旨在评估和比较项目初始阶段(2023-2024年)使用不同分析平台获得的TC结果。方法:对克罗地亚各实验室的回顾性数据进行分析。结果包括以下分析仪:Beckman Coulter AU (BC), Abbott Alinity/Architect c (AA), Roche Cobas c (RC)和Siemens Atellica CH (SA)。统计分析包括使用程序的临界值进行Kruskal-Wallis检验和卡方检验。Bland-Altman和Passing-Bablok分析用于评估40个样本的直接比较研究中的差异。为了减少可变性,TC值也被表示为中位数(MoM)的倍数,分别为每个平台计算。结果:该研究包括17,694名儿童。不同平台的中位TC值(IQR)差异显著:BC (4.3 [3.8-4.7] mmol/L)、AA(4.1[3.7-4.5])、RC(4.1[3.7-4.5])和SA (4.0 [3.6-4.4]);结论:尽管不同平台的TC测量值差异很小,但它们具有统计学意义,并影响FH分类。MoM规范化可以支持未来筛查方案的协调。
Analysis of total cholesterol results measured in the initial period of the Croatian screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia: a pilot study.
Objectives: In 2023, Croatia implemented a screening program for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) targeting children entering the first grade of primary school. The program is based on total cholesterol (TC) concentration measurements. This pilot study aimed to assess and compare TC results obtained using different analytical platforms during the program's initial phase (2023-2024).
Methods: Retrospective data from laboratories across Croatia were analyzed. Results covered the following analyzers: Beckman Coulter AU (BC), Abbott Alinity/Architect c (AA), Roche Cobas c (RC) and Siemens Atellica CH (SA). Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests using the program's cut-off values. Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok analyses were used to assess differences in a direct comparison study of 40 samples. To reduce variability, TC values were also expressed as multiples of the median (MoM), calculated separately for each platform.
Results: The study included 17,694 children. Median TC values (IQR) differed significantly across platforms: BC (4.3 [3.8-4.7] mmol/L), AA (4.1 [3.7-4.5]), RC (4.1 [3.7-4.5]), and SA (4.0 [3.6-4.4]); p<0.001. BC and SA results differed significantly from all other platforms, while no significant difference was found between RC and AA. The distribution of TC results also varied significantly (p<0.001). In the comparison study, all platforms showed statistically significant differences (p<0.001). In contrast, MoM values showed no statistically significant differences between analyzers (p=0.106) or in distribution when applying various MoM-based cut-offs.
Conclusions: Although variations in TC measurements across platforms are small, they are statistically significant and affect FH classification. MoM normalization may support harmonization in future screening protocols.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!