Amy E Strong, Kristina Rudolph, Michelle R Denburg, Aditya Badheka
{"title":"ECMO期间溶血监测实践:一项调查报告。","authors":"Amy E Strong, Kristina Rudolph, Michelle R Denburg, Aditya Badheka","doi":"10.1159/000548469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Intravascular hemolysis is a significant complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), associated with adverse outcomes such as kidney failure and increased mortality. There is wide variability in the cited incidence of this complication. This survey study aimed to characterize the variability in hemolysis monitoring practices across ECMO centers. Methods The survey, distributed via the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) newsletter, received 26 responses from various healthcare professionals, including nurses, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, and physicians. Respondents represented both pediatric and adult ECMO units, primarily from academic centers in the United States (46%). Results Findings revealed that 92% of these centers use centrifugal pumps, with Heparin and Bivalirudin being the preferred anticoagulants. While 68% of respondents reported having a standard protocol for hemolysis monitoring, the specific protocols varied widely. Plasma free hemoglobin was the most commonly monitored laboratory test. Definitions for what was considered significant hemolysis varied as well and was primarily identified by red urine and elevated plasma hemoglobin levels. Interventions to address hemolysis included adjusting pump speed, repositioning cannulas, replacing pump heads or oxygenators, and performing plasmapheresis. Conclusions The study highlights the variability in hemolysis monitoring practices among ECMO centers. Further research is warranted to establish optimal monitoring protocols to detect and potentially treat the complication of hemolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemolysis Monitoring Practices during ECMO: A Survey Report.\",\"authors\":\"Amy E Strong, Kristina Rudolph, Michelle R Denburg, Aditya Badheka\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Intravascular hemolysis is a significant complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), associated with adverse outcomes such as kidney failure and increased mortality. There is wide variability in the cited incidence of this complication. This survey study aimed to characterize the variability in hemolysis monitoring practices across ECMO centers. Methods The survey, distributed via the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) newsletter, received 26 responses from various healthcare professionals, including nurses, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, and physicians. Respondents represented both pediatric and adult ECMO units, primarily from academic centers in the United States (46%). Results Findings revealed that 92% of these centers use centrifugal pumps, with Heparin and Bivalirudin being the preferred anticoagulants. While 68% of respondents reported having a standard protocol for hemolysis monitoring, the specific protocols varied widely. Plasma free hemoglobin was the most commonly monitored laboratory test. Definitions for what was considered significant hemolysis varied as well and was primarily identified by red urine and elevated plasma hemoglobin levels. Interventions to address hemolysis included adjusting pump speed, repositioning cannulas, replacing pump heads or oxygenators, and performing plasmapheresis. Conclusions The study highlights the variability in hemolysis monitoring practices among ECMO centers. Further research is warranted to establish optimal monitoring protocols to detect and potentially treat the complication of hemolysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Purification\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Purification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hemolysis Monitoring Practices during ECMO: A Survey Report.
Introduction Intravascular hemolysis is a significant complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), associated with adverse outcomes such as kidney failure and increased mortality. There is wide variability in the cited incidence of this complication. This survey study aimed to characterize the variability in hemolysis monitoring practices across ECMO centers. Methods The survey, distributed via the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) newsletter, received 26 responses from various healthcare professionals, including nurses, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, and physicians. Respondents represented both pediatric and adult ECMO units, primarily from academic centers in the United States (46%). Results Findings revealed that 92% of these centers use centrifugal pumps, with Heparin and Bivalirudin being the preferred anticoagulants. While 68% of respondents reported having a standard protocol for hemolysis monitoring, the specific protocols varied widely. Plasma free hemoglobin was the most commonly monitored laboratory test. Definitions for what was considered significant hemolysis varied as well and was primarily identified by red urine and elevated plasma hemoglobin levels. Interventions to address hemolysis included adjusting pump speed, repositioning cannulas, replacing pump heads or oxygenators, and performing plasmapheresis. Conclusions The study highlights the variability in hemolysis monitoring practices among ECMO centers. Further research is warranted to establish optimal monitoring protocols to detect and potentially treat the complication of hemolysis.
期刊介绍:
Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.