Süleyman Albayrak, İsmail Demirkale, Mehmet Özer, Alparslan Kiliç, Hakan Şeşen, Murat Altay
{"title":"干骺端畸形患者经TKA后关节线升高更高:一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Süleyman Albayrak, İsmail Demirkale, Mehmet Özer, Alparslan Kiliç, Hakan Şeşen, Murat Altay","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06054-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Joint level restoration is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate joint line estimation methods between two patient groups with mild to moderate or advanced varus deformities.</p><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Patients were classified according to the Parvizi Classification as Type IA or Type M. Measurements were taken of distances from the fibular head, medial and lateral epicondyles, and adductor tubercle to the joint line, and the adductor ratio (AR) was calculated. Joint line elevation was measured postoperatively. Two years after surgery, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded at the end of 2 years postoperatively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Evaluation was made of 68 patients, comprising 58 (85.3%) females and 10 (14.7%) males with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 25–75; 62–69). Although preoperative AR values were significantly lower in the Type M group (p < 0.001), no significant intraoperative AR difference was found (p = 0.829). The medial epicondyle to joint line and lateral epicondyle to joint line distances showed consistency between measurements in all groups. Joint elevation was significantly higher in the Type M group (3.5 mm (IQR 3.1–3.8) than the Type IA group (2.1 mm (IQR 1.6–2.6) (p < 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative HSS were found to be similar in both groups (p = 0.995 and p = 0.374, respectively).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While Type IA gonarthrosis did not significantly affect joint line estimation and the Adductor Ratio (AR) showed inconsistency in Type M gonarthrosis, a key finding was the significantly higher joint line elevation observed in Type M compared to Type IA patients. Importantly, this increased elevation did not result in a significant impact on HSS functional scores at two years post-surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint line elevation after TKA is higher in patients with metaphyseal deformity: a prospective study\",\"authors\":\"Süleyman Albayrak, İsmail Demirkale, Mehmet Özer, Alparslan Kiliç, Hakan Şeşen, Murat Altay\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-06054-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Joint level restoration is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate joint line estimation methods between two patient groups with mild to moderate or advanced varus deformities.</p><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Patients were classified according to the Parvizi Classification as Type IA or Type M. Measurements were taken of distances from the fibular head, medial and lateral epicondyles, and adductor tubercle to the joint line, and the adductor ratio (AR) was calculated. Joint line elevation was measured postoperatively. Two years after surgery, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded at the end of 2 years postoperatively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Evaluation was made of 68 patients, comprising 58 (85.3%) females and 10 (14.7%) males with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 25–75; 62–69). Although preoperative AR values were significantly lower in the Type M group (p < 0.001), no significant intraoperative AR difference was found (p = 0.829). The medial epicondyle to joint line and lateral epicondyle to joint line distances showed consistency between measurements in all groups. Joint elevation was significantly higher in the Type M group (3.5 mm (IQR 3.1–3.8) than the Type IA group (2.1 mm (IQR 1.6–2.6) (p < 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative HSS were found to be similar in both groups (p = 0.995 and p = 0.374, respectively).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While Type IA gonarthrosis did not significantly affect joint line estimation and the Adductor Ratio (AR) showed inconsistency in Type M gonarthrosis, a key finding was the significantly higher joint line elevation observed in Type M compared to Type IA patients. Importantly, this increased elevation did not result in a significant impact on HSS functional scores at two years post-surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06054-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06054-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Joint line elevation after TKA is higher in patients with metaphyseal deformity: a prospective study
Introduction
Joint level restoration is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate joint line estimation methods between two patient groups with mild to moderate or advanced varus deformities.
Material and Methods
Patients were classified according to the Parvizi Classification as Type IA or Type M. Measurements were taken of distances from the fibular head, medial and lateral epicondyles, and adductor tubercle to the joint line, and the adductor ratio (AR) was calculated. Joint line elevation was measured postoperatively. Two years after surgery, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded at the end of 2 years postoperatively.
Results
Evaluation was made of 68 patients, comprising 58 (85.3%) females and 10 (14.7%) males with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 25–75; 62–69). Although preoperative AR values were significantly lower in the Type M group (p < 0.001), no significant intraoperative AR difference was found (p = 0.829). The medial epicondyle to joint line and lateral epicondyle to joint line distances showed consistency between measurements in all groups. Joint elevation was significantly higher in the Type M group (3.5 mm (IQR 3.1–3.8) than the Type IA group (2.1 mm (IQR 1.6–2.6) (p < 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative HSS were found to be similar in both groups (p = 0.995 and p = 0.374, respectively).
Conclusions
While Type IA gonarthrosis did not significantly affect joint line estimation and the Adductor Ratio (AR) showed inconsistency in Type M gonarthrosis, a key finding was the significantly higher joint line elevation observed in Type M compared to Type IA patients. Importantly, this increased elevation did not result in a significant impact on HSS functional scores at two years post-surgery.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).