Cord-Friedrich Niehaus, Guram Imnadze, Thomas Eitz, Heinrich Weglage, Vanessa Sciacca, Philipp Lucas, Lilit Antonyan, Sebastian E Beyer, Ersan Akkaya, Elias Waezsada, Yuri Bocchini, Mustapha El Hamriti, Stephan Winnik, Denise Guckel, Maxim Didenko, Moneeb Khalaph, Christian Sohns, Philipp Sommer, Thomas Fink
{"title":"无专用三维鞘的左束支起搏导联植入的初步经验。","authors":"Cord-Friedrich Niehaus, Guram Imnadze, Thomas Eitz, Heinrich Weglage, Vanessa Sciacca, Philipp Lucas, Lilit Antonyan, Sebastian E Beyer, Ersan Akkaya, Elias Waezsada, Yuri Bocchini, Mustapha El Hamriti, Stephan Winnik, Denise Guckel, Maxim Didenko, Moneeb Khalaph, Christian Sohns, Philipp Sommer, Thomas Fink","doi":"10.1111/pace.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as an alternative to cardiac stimulation via right ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy using coronary sinus leads. The approach utilizes dedicated three-dimensional guiding catheters for lead placement. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a simplified approach of implantation of an LBBAP electrode without a dedicated guiding catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective single-center proof-of-concept evaluation. Patients with an indication for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were consecutively enrolled. All patients received ventricular lead placement with a commercially available stylet-driven pacemaker lead. LBBAP was attempted without the use of a dedicated guiding catheter but with the help of a manually three-dimensionally pre-curved stylet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients were analyzed. Procedure and fluoroscopy durations were 61 ± 12 min and 7.4 ± 3.9 min, while LBBAP lead placement was successful in 19 patients (79%). In these patients, the V6-R-wave peak time was 74 ± 11 ms, the V1V6 interpeak interval was 51 ± 11 ms, and QRS width during unipolar stimulation was 123 ± 14 ms. No complications attributed to the transseptal route of the pacing lead occurred. After a mean follow-up of 104 ± 20 days, there was no significant change in QRS widths (123 ± 15 ms, p = 0.94), V6-R wave peak time (70 ± 11 ms, p = 0.3), and V1V6 interpeak interval (45 ± 10 ms; p = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implantation of an LBBAP electrode without the use of a dedicated three-dimensional sheath is feasible and safe in a high proportion of patients. Further studies are necessary to define the impact of this technique for potential use in clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Experience With Implantation Left Bundle Branch Pacing Leads Without a Dedicated Three-Dimensional Sheath.\",\"authors\":\"Cord-Friedrich Niehaus, Guram Imnadze, Thomas Eitz, Heinrich Weglage, Vanessa Sciacca, Philipp Lucas, Lilit Antonyan, Sebastian E Beyer, Ersan Akkaya, Elias Waezsada, Yuri Bocchini, Mustapha El Hamriti, Stephan Winnik, Denise Guckel, Maxim Didenko, Moneeb Khalaph, Christian Sohns, Philipp Sommer, Thomas Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as an alternative to cardiac stimulation via right ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy using coronary sinus leads. The approach utilizes dedicated three-dimensional guiding catheters for lead placement. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a simplified approach of implantation of an LBBAP electrode without a dedicated guiding catheter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective single-center proof-of-concept evaluation. Patients with an indication for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were consecutively enrolled. All patients received ventricular lead placement with a commercially available stylet-driven pacemaker lead. LBBAP was attempted without the use of a dedicated guiding catheter but with the help of a manually three-dimensionally pre-curved stylet.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 patients were analyzed. Procedure and fluoroscopy durations were 61 ± 12 min and 7.4 ± 3.9 min, while LBBAP lead placement was successful in 19 patients (79%). In these patients, the V6-R-wave peak time was 74 ± 11 ms, the V1V6 interpeak interval was 51 ± 11 ms, and QRS width during unipolar stimulation was 123 ± 14 ms. No complications attributed to the transseptal route of the pacing lead occurred. After a mean follow-up of 104 ± 20 days, there was no significant change in QRS widths (123 ± 15 ms, p = 0.94), V6-R wave peak time (70 ± 11 ms, p = 0.3), and V1V6 interpeak interval (45 ± 10 ms; p = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implantation of an LBBAP electrode without the use of a dedicated three-dimensional sheath is feasible and safe in a high proportion of patients. Further studies are necessary to define the impact of this technique for potential use in clinical routine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1086-1093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504926/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:左束分支区域起搏(LBBAP)已成为通过右心室起搏和冠状窦导联进行心脏再同步化治疗的心脏刺激的替代方案。该方法利用专用的三维导尿管放置导联。我们的目的是评估一种无需专用导尿管植入LBBAP电极的简化方法的可行性和安全性。方法:这是一项前瞻性的单中心概念验证评估。有双腔起搏器植入指征的患者连续入组。所有患者都接受了心室导联置入,并使用市售的样式驱动型起搏器导联。LBBAP在没有使用专用导尿管的情况下进行了尝试,而是在手动三维预弯曲针的帮助下进行了尝试。结果:共分析24例患者。手术时间和透视时间分别为61±12分钟和7.4±3.9分钟,19例患者(79%)成功放置LBBAP导联。这些患者的v6 - r波峰值时间为74±11 ms, V1V6峰间间隔为51±11 ms,单极刺激时QRS宽度为123±14 ms。无起搏导联经间隔路径引起的并发症。平均随访104±20 d后,QRS宽度(123±15 ms, p = 0.94)、V6-R峰时间(70±11 ms, p = 0.3)、V1V6峰间间隔(45±10 ms, p = 0.12)无显著变化。结论:LBBAP电极无需专用三维护套植入在高比例患者中是可行且安全的。需要进一步的研究来确定该技术在临床常规应用中的潜在影响。
Initial Experience With Implantation Left Bundle Branch Pacing Leads Without a Dedicated Three-Dimensional Sheath.
Aims: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as an alternative to cardiac stimulation via right ventricular pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy using coronary sinus leads. The approach utilizes dedicated three-dimensional guiding catheters for lead placement. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a simplified approach of implantation of an LBBAP electrode without a dedicated guiding catheter.
Methods: This was a prospective single-center proof-of-concept evaluation. Patients with an indication for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were consecutively enrolled. All patients received ventricular lead placement with a commercially available stylet-driven pacemaker lead. LBBAP was attempted without the use of a dedicated guiding catheter but with the help of a manually three-dimensionally pre-curved stylet.
Results: A total of 24 patients were analyzed. Procedure and fluoroscopy durations were 61 ± 12 min and 7.4 ± 3.9 min, while LBBAP lead placement was successful in 19 patients (79%). In these patients, the V6-R-wave peak time was 74 ± 11 ms, the V1V6 interpeak interval was 51 ± 11 ms, and QRS width during unipolar stimulation was 123 ± 14 ms. No complications attributed to the transseptal route of the pacing lead occurred. After a mean follow-up of 104 ± 20 days, there was no significant change in QRS widths (123 ± 15 ms, p = 0.94), V6-R wave peak time (70 ± 11 ms, p = 0.3), and V1V6 interpeak interval (45 ± 10 ms; p = 0.12).
Conclusion: Implantation of an LBBAP electrode without the use of a dedicated three-dimensional sheath is feasible and safe in a high proportion of patients. Further studies are necessary to define the impact of this technique for potential use in clinical routine.