心脏康复对植入式心脏装置患者的功能和心理影响。

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1111/pace.70048
Christian D Adams S, Angely Paola Ceron Noriega, Leonardo Arzayus-Patiño, Carolina Castro Gomez
{"title":"心脏康复对植入式心脏装置患者的功能和心理影响。","authors":"Christian D Adams S, Angely Paola Ceron Noriega, Leonardo Arzayus-Patiño, Carolina Castro Gomez","doi":"10.1111/pace.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are established interventions for improving physical and psychological outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, data on their effects in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), particularly in Latin America, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured CR program on functional capacity, psychological well-being, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CIED implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included 30 patients with CIEDs (pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices) enrolled in a CR program. Baseline assessments included the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), metabolic equivalents (METs), peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale scores. Patients completed a 12-week outpatient CR program, and outcomes were reassessed after program completion and at 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the mean LVEF was 45.9% (±19.2), and the average 6MWT distance was 383.3 m (82.5% of predicted). Following CR, significant improvements were observed in 6MWT distance, METs, VO<sub>2</sub>, LVEF, and HAD scale scores for anxiety and depression (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed improvements in functional capacity metrics for patients with pacemakers and CRT devices. Adverse events included one heart transplant in the ICD group and one death due to refractory heart failure in the CRT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CR programs significantly improve physical capacity, psychological well-being, and functional class in patients with CIEDs, with low complication rates.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in a Latin American population. The CR programs significantly improve exercise capacity, left ventricular function, and anxiety/depression scores in patients with CIEDs. The CR programs are safe with low complication rates in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The study highlights the need for integrating CR into standard care for CIED patients to enhance functional and psychological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1184-1190"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional and Psychological Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Christian D Adams S, Angely Paola Ceron Noriega, Leonardo Arzayus-Patiño, Carolina Castro Gomez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.70048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are established interventions for improving physical and psychological outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, data on their effects in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), particularly in Latin America, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured CR program on functional capacity, psychological well-being, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CIED implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included 30 patients with CIEDs (pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices) enrolled in a CR program. Baseline assessments included the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), metabolic equivalents (METs), peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale scores. Patients completed a 12-week outpatient CR program, and outcomes were reassessed after program completion and at 1-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the mean LVEF was 45.9% (±19.2), and the average 6MWT distance was 383.3 m (82.5% of predicted). Following CR, significant improvements were observed in 6MWT distance, METs, VO<sub>2</sub>, LVEF, and HAD scale scores for anxiety and depression (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed improvements in functional capacity metrics for patients with pacemakers and CRT devices. Adverse events included one heart transplant in the ICD group and one death due to refractory heart failure in the CRT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CR programs significantly improve physical capacity, psychological well-being, and functional class in patients with CIEDs, with low complication rates.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This study is the first to evaluate the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in a Latin American population. The CR programs significantly improve exercise capacity, left ventricular function, and anxiety/depression scores in patients with CIEDs. The CR programs are safe with low complication rates in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The study highlights the need for integrating CR into standard care for CIED patients to enhance functional and psychological outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1184-1190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏康复(CR)计划是改善心血管疾病患者生理和心理预后的既定干预措施。然而,关于它们对心脏植入式电子装置(cied)患者的影响的数据,特别是在拉丁美洲,仍然有限。目的:评估结构化CR计划对植入术患者功能能力、心理健康和临床结果的影响。方法:本队列研究纳入了30例纳入CR计划的cied(起搏器、植入式心律转复除颤器或心脏再同步化治疗装置)患者。基线评估包括6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、代谢当量(METs)、峰值摄氧量(VO2)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和医院焦虑和抑郁(HAD)量表评分。患者完成了为期12周的门诊CR计划,并在计划完成后和1年随访时重新评估结果。结果:基线时,平均LVEF为45.9%(±19.2),平均6MWT距离为383.3 m(预测的82.5%)。CR后,6MWT距离、METs、VO2、LVEF和HAD焦虑抑郁量表得分均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。亚组分析显示,使用起搏器和CRT设备的患者功能容量指标有所改善。不良事件包括ICD组1例心脏移植,CRT组1例因难治性心力衰竭死亡。结论:CR方案显著改善cied患者的身体能力、心理健康和功能等级,并发症发生率低。摘要:本研究首次评估了心脏康复(CR)计划在拉丁美洲人群中对心脏植入式电子装置(cied)患者的益处。CR方案显著改善cied患者的运动能力、左心室功能和焦虑/抑郁评分。CR方案对于使用起搏器和植入式心律转复除颤器的患者是安全的,并发症发生率低。该研究强调了将CR纳入CIED患者的标准护理以提高功能和心理预后的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional and Psychological Impact of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are established interventions for improving physical and psychological outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases. However, data on their effects in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), particularly in Latin America, remain limited.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of a structured CR program on functional capacity, psychological well-being, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CIED implantation.

Methods: This cohort study included 30 patients with CIEDs (pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices) enrolled in a CR program. Baseline assessments included the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), metabolic equivalents (METs), peak oxygen uptake (VO2), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale scores. Patients completed a 12-week outpatient CR program, and outcomes were reassessed after program completion and at 1-year follow-up.

Results: At baseline, the mean LVEF was 45.9% (±19.2), and the average 6MWT distance was 383.3 m (82.5% of predicted). Following CR, significant improvements were observed in 6MWT distance, METs, VO2, LVEF, and HAD scale scores for anxiety and depression (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed improvements in functional capacity metrics for patients with pacemakers and CRT devices. Adverse events included one heart transplant in the ICD group and one death due to refractory heart failure in the CRT group.

Conclusion: CR programs significantly improve physical capacity, psychological well-being, and functional class in patients with CIEDs, with low complication rates.

Summary: This study is the first to evaluate the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in a Latin American population. The CR programs significantly improve exercise capacity, left ventricular function, and anxiety/depression scores in patients with CIEDs. The CR programs are safe with low complication rates in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. The study highlights the need for integrating CR into standard care for CIED patients to enhance functional and psychological outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信