Matthew K Wagar, Allison Zinter, Stephanie M McGregor, Makeba Williams, Lisa M Barroilhet, Katherine Sampene
{"title":"术前诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变患者的淋巴结转移发生率。","authors":"Matthew K Wagar, Allison Zinter, Stephanie M McGregor, Makeba Williams, Lisa M Barroilhet, Katherine Sampene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and endometrial cancer staging historically has included lymph node assessment to inform prognosis and guide recommendations for adjuvant treatment. This study sought to determine the incidence of lymph node involvement in patients undergoing hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection for a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) to allow for risk stratification and management by general gynecology and gynecologic oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with EIN who underwent hysterectomy from January 2018 through July 2021. We collected and analyzed patient characteristics, perioperative metrics, and postoperative data. Incidence of lymph node positivity on final pathology was the primary outcome of interest. We analyzed clinical and histologic risk factors for correlation with a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Chi-square, Fisher exact, and <i>t</i> tests were used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients met inclusion criteria, 40 of whom had an underlying endometrial cancer. The majority were stage IA grade 1 endometrioid carcinomas (95%). Per institutional protocol, all patients were recommended sentinel lymph node dissection, of which 84 (84%) patients ultimately underwent lymph node dissection. One patient was found to have a positive sentinel lymph node on final pathology (1.2%). Increasing endometrial stripe thickness was positively associated with risk of endometrial carcinoma on final pathology (22.39 mm ± 31.87 vs 11.78 mm ± 5.17, <i>P</i> = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of lymph node involvement in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN is low. Sentinel lymph node dissection is unlikely to affect adjuvant treatment recommendations following surgical staging. Standardized risk assessment methods are warranted for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN to delineate the utility of lymph node assessment in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"124 3","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With a Preoperative Diagnosis of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew K Wagar, Allison Zinter, Stephanie M McGregor, Makeba Williams, Lisa M Barroilhet, Katherine Sampene\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and endometrial cancer staging historically has included lymph node assessment to inform prognosis and guide recommendations for adjuvant treatment. This study sought to determine the incidence of lymph node involvement in patients undergoing hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection for a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) to allow for risk stratification and management by general gynecology and gynecologic oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with EIN who underwent hysterectomy from January 2018 through July 2021. We collected and analyzed patient characteristics, perioperative metrics, and postoperative data. Incidence of lymph node positivity on final pathology was the primary outcome of interest. We analyzed clinical and histologic risk factors for correlation with a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Chi-square, Fisher exact, and <i>t</i> tests were used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients met inclusion criteria, 40 of whom had an underlying endometrial cancer. The majority were stage IA grade 1 endometrioid carcinomas (95%). Per institutional protocol, all patients were recommended sentinel lymph node dissection, of which 84 (84%) patients ultimately underwent lymph node dissection. One patient was found to have a positive sentinel lymph node on final pathology (1.2%). Increasing endometrial stripe thickness was positively associated with risk of endometrial carcinoma on final pathology (22.39 mm ± 31.87 vs 11.78 mm ± 5.17, <i>P</i> = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of lymph node involvement in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN is low. Sentinel lymph node dissection is unlikely to affect adjuvant treatment recommendations following surgical staging. Standardized risk assessment methods are warranted for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN to delineate the utility of lymph node assessment in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin\",\"volume\":\"124 3\",\"pages\":\"223-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:子宫内膜癌是美国最常见的妇科癌症,历史上子宫内膜癌分期包括淋巴结评估,以告知预后和指导辅助治疗的建议。本研究旨在确定在术前诊断子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN)时进行子宫切除术并前哨淋巴结清扫的患者的淋巴结累及发生率,以便通过普通妇科和妇科肿瘤学进行风险分层和管理。方法:我们对2018年1月至2021年7月诊断为EIN并接受子宫切除术的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。我们收集并分析了患者特征、围手术期指标和术后数据。淋巴结阳性在最终病理上的发生率是我们感兴趣的主要结果。我们分析了与子宫内膜癌最终诊断相关的临床和组织学危险因素。采用卡方检验、费雪精确检验和t检验进行比较。结果:100例患者符合纳入标准,其中40例有潜在的子宫内膜癌。大多数为IA期1级子宫内膜样癌(95%)。根据机构方案,所有患者均推荐前哨淋巴结清扫,其中84例(84%)患者最终接受了淋巴结清扫。1例患者在最终病理中发现前哨淋巴结阳性(1.2%)。子宫内膜条纹厚度增加与最终病理诊断为子宫内膜癌的风险呈正相关(22.39 mm±31.87 vs 11.78 mm±5.17,P = 0.023)。结论:术前诊断为EIN的患者淋巴结受累的发生率较低。前哨淋巴结清扫不太可能影响手术分期后的辅助治疗建议。对于术前诊断为EIN的患者,标准化的风险评估方法是必要的,以描述淋巴结评估在该人群中的效用。
Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With a Preoperative Diagnosis of Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Introduction: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, and endometrial cancer staging historically has included lymph node assessment to inform prognosis and guide recommendations for adjuvant treatment. This study sought to determine the incidence of lymph node involvement in patients undergoing hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection for a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) to allow for risk stratification and management by general gynecology and gynecologic oncology.
Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with EIN who underwent hysterectomy from January 2018 through July 2021. We collected and analyzed patient characteristics, perioperative metrics, and postoperative data. Incidence of lymph node positivity on final pathology was the primary outcome of interest. We analyzed clinical and histologic risk factors for correlation with a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Chi-square, Fisher exact, and t tests were used for comparisons.
Results: One hundred patients met inclusion criteria, 40 of whom had an underlying endometrial cancer. The majority were stage IA grade 1 endometrioid carcinomas (95%). Per institutional protocol, all patients were recommended sentinel lymph node dissection, of which 84 (84%) patients ultimately underwent lymph node dissection. One patient was found to have a positive sentinel lymph node on final pathology (1.2%). Increasing endometrial stripe thickness was positively associated with risk of endometrial carcinoma on final pathology (22.39 mm ± 31.87 vs 11.78 mm ± 5.17, P = 0.023).
Conclusions: The incidence of lymph node involvement in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN is low. Sentinel lymph node dissection is unlikely to affect adjuvant treatment recommendations following surgical staging. Standardized risk assessment methods are warranted for patients with a preoperative diagnosis of EIN to delineate the utility of lymph node assessment in this population.