重症监护快速急性镇静与大剂量静脉抗癫痫药物治疗非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:一项随机多中心试验

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001311
Camilla Dyremose Cornwall, Henning Piilgaard, Thorbjørn Søndergaard Engedal, Hanne Tanghus Olsen, Kirsten Møller, Thomas Krøigård, Bülent Uslu, Jakob Christensen, Annette Sidaros, Christoph Patrick Beier
{"title":"重症监护快速急性镇静与大剂量静脉抗癫痫药物治疗非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:一项随机多中心试验","authors":"Camilla Dyremose Cornwall, Henning Piilgaard, Thorbjørn Søndergaard Engedal, Hanne Tanghus Olsen, Kirsten Møller, Thomas Krøigård, Bülent Uslu, Jakob Christensen, Annette Sidaros, Christoph Patrick Beier","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of refractory status epilepticus (SE) remains an area of low evidence with varying management strategies. Treatment in the ICU is often postponed due to potential complications from sedation, and it is unknown if its efficacy is superior to additional treatment attempts with IV anti-seizure medications (ASMs). The Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-Seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (FAST) trial aims to compare the efficacy of rapid sedation in the ICU vs. add-on high-dose IV ASM alone for the treatment of refractory SE.</p><p><strong>Methods/results: </strong>This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial will enroll adult patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) who either meet current EEG criteria or have unambiguous NCSE with minor motor phenomena (\"subtle SE\") but without ongoing tonic-clonic seizures that are refractory to benzodiazepines and treatment with at least one second-line ASM. Patients will be randomized to receive either rapid deep sedation for 20 hours with propofol and eventually low-dose midazolam or additional high-dose IV anticonvulsant therapy (levetiracetam, valproate, fosphenytoin, lacosamide, or topiramate) in the intermediate care unit. The primary endpoint is treatment failure, either defined as NCSE on EEG 24 hours after randomization or persistent NCSE after 3 hours despite therapy on continuous EEG or clinically. Secondary endpoints include assessment of new-onset neurologic deficits and modified Rankin Scale at discharge, economic analyses, length of hospital stay, in-hospital infections, and survival. Evaluations will be performed at baseline, discharge, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The target sample size is 116 patients; we expect to have to randomize about 140 patients to reach the required number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAST trial is the first randomized clinical trial to investigate refractory NCSE. Regardless of the outcome, the results of this trial protocol will provide new class 1 evidence for the treatment of NCSE and establish the standard of care for this patient population in the future.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EU CT: 2024-515507-18-00/clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05263674.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Dyremose Cornwall, Henning Piilgaard, Thorbjørn Søndergaard Engedal, Hanne Tanghus Olsen, Kirsten Møller, Thomas Krøigård, Bülent Uslu, Jakob Christensen, Annette Sidaros, Christoph Patrick Beier\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of refractory status epilepticus (SE) remains an area of low evidence with varying management strategies. Treatment in the ICU is often postponed due to potential complications from sedation, and it is unknown if its efficacy is superior to additional treatment attempts with IV anti-seizure medications (ASMs). The Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-Seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (FAST) trial aims to compare the efficacy of rapid sedation in the ICU vs. add-on high-dose IV ASM alone for the treatment of refractory SE.</p><p><strong>Methods/results: </strong>This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial will enroll adult patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) who either meet current EEG criteria or have unambiguous NCSE with minor motor phenomena (\\\"subtle SE\\\") but without ongoing tonic-clonic seizures that are refractory to benzodiazepines and treatment with at least one second-line ASM. Patients will be randomized to receive either rapid deep sedation for 20 hours with propofol and eventually low-dose midazolam or additional high-dose IV anticonvulsant therapy (levetiracetam, valproate, fosphenytoin, lacosamide, or topiramate) in the intermediate care unit. The primary endpoint is treatment failure, either defined as NCSE on EEG 24 hours after randomization or persistent NCSE after 3 hours despite therapy on continuous EEG or clinically. Secondary endpoints include assessment of new-onset neurologic deficits and modified Rankin Scale at discharge, economic analyses, length of hospital stay, in-hospital infections, and survival. Evaluations will be performed at baseline, discharge, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The target sample size is 116 patients; we expect to have to randomize about 140 patients to reach the required number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FAST trial is the first randomized clinical trial to investigate refractory NCSE. Regardless of the outcome, the results of this trial protocol will provide new class 1 evidence for the treatment of NCSE and establish the standard of care for this patient population in the future.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>EU CT: 2024-515507-18-00/clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05263674.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 9\",\"pages\":\"e1311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440533/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:难治性癫痫持续状态(SE)的管理仍然是一个低证据的领域,有不同的管理策略。由于镇静的潜在并发症,ICU的治疗经常被推迟,并且尚不清楚其疗效是否优于静脉注射抗癫痫药物(asm)的额外治疗尝试。重症监护快速急性镇静与高剂量静脉抗癫痫药物治疗非惊厥癫痫持续状态(Fast)试验旨在比较ICU快速镇静与单独添加高剂量静脉抗癫痫药物治疗难治性SE的疗效。方法/结果:这项前瞻性、随机、多中心试验将招募符合当前EEG标准的非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)的成年患者,或有明确的NCSE伴有轻微运动现象(“细微SE”),但没有持续的强直-阵挛性发作,对苯二氮卓类药物和至少一种二线ASM治疗难以治愈。患者将被随机分配,在中间护理病房接受丙泊酚和低剂量咪达唑仑的快速深度镇静20小时,或额外的高剂量静脉抗惊厥治疗(左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸、磷妥英、拉科沙胺或托吡酯)。主要终点是治疗失败,定义为随机分组后24小时脑电图NCSE或连续脑电图或临床治疗后3小时持续NCSE。次要终点包括出院时新发神经功能缺损和改良Rankin量表的评估、经济分析、住院时间、院内感染和生存率。评估将在基线、出院、3、6、12和24个月进行。目标样本量为116例患者;我们预计必须随机抽取大约140名患者才能达到所需的患者数量。结论:FAST试验是首个研究难治性NCSE的随机临床试验。无论结果如何,该试验方案的结果将为NCSE的治疗提供新的一级证据,并建立未来该患者群体的护理标准。试验注册:欧盟CT: 2024-515507-18-00/clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05263674。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.

Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.

Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Randomized, Multicenter Trial.

Background: The management of refractory status epilepticus (SE) remains an area of low evidence with varying management strategies. Treatment in the ICU is often postponed due to potential complications from sedation, and it is unknown if its efficacy is superior to additional treatment attempts with IV anti-seizure medications (ASMs). The Fast Acute Sedation at Intensive Care vs. High-Dose IV Anti-Seizure Medication for Treatment of Non-Convulsive Status Epilepticus (FAST) trial aims to compare the efficacy of rapid sedation in the ICU vs. add-on high-dose IV ASM alone for the treatment of refractory SE.

Methods/results: This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial will enroll adult patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) who either meet current EEG criteria or have unambiguous NCSE with minor motor phenomena ("subtle SE") but without ongoing tonic-clonic seizures that are refractory to benzodiazepines and treatment with at least one second-line ASM. Patients will be randomized to receive either rapid deep sedation for 20 hours with propofol and eventually low-dose midazolam or additional high-dose IV anticonvulsant therapy (levetiracetam, valproate, fosphenytoin, lacosamide, or topiramate) in the intermediate care unit. The primary endpoint is treatment failure, either defined as NCSE on EEG 24 hours after randomization or persistent NCSE after 3 hours despite therapy on continuous EEG or clinically. Secondary endpoints include assessment of new-onset neurologic deficits and modified Rankin Scale at discharge, economic analyses, length of hospital stay, in-hospital infections, and survival. Evaluations will be performed at baseline, discharge, and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The target sample size is 116 patients; we expect to have to randomize about 140 patients to reach the required number of patients.

Conclusions: The FAST trial is the first randomized clinical trial to investigate refractory NCSE. Regardless of the outcome, the results of this trial protocol will provide new class 1 evidence for the treatment of NCSE and establish the standard of care for this patient population in the future.

Trial registration: EU CT: 2024-515507-18-00/clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05263674.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信