利用大规模儿童CT/MRI成像研究评估当前骨内针的安全性和基于年龄的指导潜力

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001322
Dilshan Rajan, Anuk Dias, Shaliny Jadhav, Cassiano Crespo-Santiago, Jeffrey Ames, Gwenyth Fischer, Michael Murati
{"title":"利用大规模儿童CT/MRI成像研究评估当前骨内针的安全性和基于年龄的指导潜力","authors":"Dilshan Rajan, Anuk Dias, Shaliny Jadhav, Cassiano Crespo-Santiago, Jeffrey Ames, Gwenyth Fischer, Michael Murati","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To use 3D imaging modalities to obtain precise measurements of the proximal tibia in pediatric patients and assess the safety of current intraosseous needle lengths (15 and 25 mm).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University of Minnesota and MHealth Fairview System, Minneapolis, MN.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Pediatric patients (≤ 16 yr) who underwent full-body positron emission tomography-CT or axial MRI scans of the lower extremities between January 2014 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 912 scans were initially retrieved; 232 scans were excluded due to osseous diseases, tibial fractures, suboptimal scan quality, or soft-tissue abnormalities, leaving 680 scans for analysis. Scans were stratified into 1-year age groups. Measurements at the proximal tibia included soft-tissue thickness, cortical bone thickness, and medullary canal diameter. Other values, such as the pre-intraosseous space (sum of cortical thickness and soft-tissue depth) and total distance to deep cortex, were calculated. Simulated needle insertions demonstrated that 31.62% of the 15 mm needles were too shallow, failing to reach the medullary canal, whereas 34.85% of the 25 mm needles were too deep, both of which could cause severe complications. A cutoff analysis for needle size based on age rather than weight was also calculated. For the 15 mm needle, 95% CI was not found in any age range, and the highest confidence cutoff was for using the needle in the age range of 0-8 years (91.9%). The 25 mm needle had a 97.8% CI from ages 10-16.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals significant age-related variability in the proximal tibia's anatomical dimensions, suggesting that standard 15 and 25 mm intraosseous needles may not reliably achieve optimal placement in pediatric patients. Our findings indicate that the current intraosseous needles may not be as safe as previously thought and support the need to develop improved intraosseous needle designs to enhance safety and therapeutic effectiveness in pediatric emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Safety of Current Intraosseous Needles and the Potential for Age-Based Guidance Using a Large-Scale Pediatric CT/MRI Imaging Study.\",\"authors\":\"Dilshan Rajan, Anuk Dias, Shaliny Jadhav, Cassiano Crespo-Santiago, Jeffrey Ames, Gwenyth Fischer, Michael Murati\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To use 3D imaging modalities to obtain precise measurements of the proximal tibia in pediatric patients and assess the safety of current intraosseous needle lengths (15 and 25 mm).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University of Minnesota and MHealth Fairview System, Minneapolis, MN.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Pediatric patients (≤ 16 yr) who underwent full-body positron emission tomography-CT or axial MRI scans of the lower extremities between January 2014 and December 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 912 scans were initially retrieved; 232 scans were excluded due to osseous diseases, tibial fractures, suboptimal scan quality, or soft-tissue abnormalities, leaving 680 scans for analysis. Scans were stratified into 1-year age groups. Measurements at the proximal tibia included soft-tissue thickness, cortical bone thickness, and medullary canal diameter. Other values, such as the pre-intraosseous space (sum of cortical thickness and soft-tissue depth) and total distance to deep cortex, were calculated. Simulated needle insertions demonstrated that 31.62% of the 15 mm needles were too shallow, failing to reach the medullary canal, whereas 34.85% of the 25 mm needles were too deep, both of which could cause severe complications. A cutoff analysis for needle size based on age rather than weight was also calculated. For the 15 mm needle, 95% CI was not found in any age range, and the highest confidence cutoff was for using the needle in the age range of 0-8 years (91.9%). The 25 mm needle had a 97.8% CI from ages 10-16.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study reveals significant age-related variability in the proximal tibia's anatomical dimensions, suggesting that standard 15 and 25 mm intraosseous needles may not reliably achieve optimal placement in pediatric patients. Our findings indicate that the current intraosseous needles may not be as safe as previously thought and support the need to develop improved intraosseous needle designs to enhance safety and therapeutic effectiveness in pediatric emergency care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 9\",\"pages\":\"e1322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440465/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用三维成像方式获得儿科患者胫骨近端精确测量,并评估当前骨内针长度(15和25 mm)的安全性。设计:回顾性描述性研究。环境:明尼苏达大学和MHealth Fairview System, Minneapolis, MN。患者:2014年1月至2023年12月期间接受全身正电子发射断层扫描- ct或轴向MRI下肢扫描的儿童患者(≤16岁)。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:最初共检索了912次扫描;232张扫描由于骨性疾病、胫骨骨折、扫描质量不佳或软组织异常而被排除,留下680张扫描用于分析。扫描结果被分成1岁年龄组。胫骨近端测量包括软组织厚度、皮质骨厚度和髓管直径。计算其他值,如骨内间隙(皮质厚度和软组织深度的总和)和到深部皮质的总距离。模拟针头插入结果显示,15 mm针头过浅的占31.62%,无法到达髓管,而25 mm针头过深的占34.85%,两者都可能导致严重的并发症。还计算了基于年龄而不是体重的针头大小的截断分析。对于15mm针头,95% CI未在任何年龄范围内发现,最高置信截止值为0-8岁年龄段(91.9%)。10-16岁25 mm针CI为97.8%。结论:该研究揭示了胫骨近端解剖尺寸的显著年龄相关性,表明标准的15和25毫米骨内针可能无法可靠地在儿科患者中实现最佳放置。我们的研究结果表明,目前的骨内针可能不像以前认为的那样安全,并支持需要开发改进的骨内针设计,以提高儿科急诊护理的安全性和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the Safety of Current Intraosseous Needles and the Potential for Age-Based Guidance Using a Large-Scale Pediatric CT/MRI Imaging Study.

Evaluating the Safety of Current Intraosseous Needles and the Potential for Age-Based Guidance Using a Large-Scale Pediatric CT/MRI Imaging Study.

Evaluating the Safety of Current Intraosseous Needles and the Potential for Age-Based Guidance Using a Large-Scale Pediatric CT/MRI Imaging Study.

Objectives: To use 3D imaging modalities to obtain precise measurements of the proximal tibia in pediatric patients and assess the safety of current intraosseous needle lengths (15 and 25 mm).

Design: Retrospective descriptive study.

Setting: University of Minnesota and MHealth Fairview System, Minneapolis, MN.

Patients: Pediatric patients (≤ 16 yr) who underwent full-body positron emission tomography-CT or axial MRI scans of the lower extremities between January 2014 and December 2023.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: A total of 912 scans were initially retrieved; 232 scans were excluded due to osseous diseases, tibial fractures, suboptimal scan quality, or soft-tissue abnormalities, leaving 680 scans for analysis. Scans were stratified into 1-year age groups. Measurements at the proximal tibia included soft-tissue thickness, cortical bone thickness, and medullary canal diameter. Other values, such as the pre-intraosseous space (sum of cortical thickness and soft-tissue depth) and total distance to deep cortex, were calculated. Simulated needle insertions demonstrated that 31.62% of the 15 mm needles were too shallow, failing to reach the medullary canal, whereas 34.85% of the 25 mm needles were too deep, both of which could cause severe complications. A cutoff analysis for needle size based on age rather than weight was also calculated. For the 15 mm needle, 95% CI was not found in any age range, and the highest confidence cutoff was for using the needle in the age range of 0-8 years (91.9%). The 25 mm needle had a 97.8% CI from ages 10-16.

Conclusions: The study reveals significant age-related variability in the proximal tibia's anatomical dimensions, suggesting that standard 15 and 25 mm intraosseous needles may not reliably achieve optimal placement in pediatric patients. Our findings indicate that the current intraosseous needles may not be as safe as previously thought and support the need to develop improved intraosseous needle designs to enhance safety and therapeutic effectiveness in pediatric emergency care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信