François Luc, Simon Arvati, Nicolas Mainard, Anne-Laure Simon, Mourad Ould-Slimane, Brice Ilharreborde
{"title":"术中俯卧位无器械额位x线片影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术远端融合位选择吗?","authors":"François Luc, Simon Arvati, Nicolas Mainard, Anne-Laure Simon, Mourad Ould-Slimane, Brice Ilharreborde","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to optimize functional and radiological outcomes. Despite established guidelines, the selection strategies vary widely among surgeons. This study aimed to assess how often prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs influence LIV selection. The main hypothesis is that uninstrumented intraoperative radiographs lead to a more conservative selection of the LIV level during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively analyzed. Preoperative fusion levels were determined, by the staff, six months before surgery using 3D EOS low dose stereoradiography (standing and lateral bending) and supine frontal radiographs. The final LIV chosen during surgery was recorded and compared to the planned one. Frontal radiological parameters (preoperative and intraoperative) were compared between the group \"no change\" (NC) and the group \"change\" (C), in which the surgeon changed his decision based on the intraoperative radiograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final LIV matched the preoperative plan in 57% of cases, but changes occurred in 43%, particularly for Lenke 1A curves (47.5%). Two radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups: LIV-CSVL (Central Sacral Vertical Line) (p = 0.04) and LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02). Logistic regression indicated Lenke lumbar modifiers A and B significantly increased the likelihood of intraoperative LIV changes (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs substantially impact LIV selection in AIS surgery, especially in Lenke 1A and B curves where selective thoracic fusion is considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; retrospective cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiograph influence distal fusion level selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?\",\"authors\":\"François Luc, Simon Arvati, Nicolas Mainard, Anne-Laure Simon, Mourad Ould-Slimane, Brice Ilharreborde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to optimize functional and radiological outcomes. Despite established guidelines, the selection strategies vary widely among surgeons. This study aimed to assess how often prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs influence LIV selection. The main hypothesis is that uninstrumented intraoperative radiographs lead to a more conservative selection of the LIV level during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively analyzed. Preoperative fusion levels were determined, by the staff, six months before surgery using 3D EOS low dose stereoradiography (standing and lateral bending) and supine frontal radiographs. The final LIV chosen during surgery was recorded and compared to the planned one. Frontal radiological parameters (preoperative and intraoperative) were compared between the group \\\"no change\\\" (NC) and the group \\\"change\\\" (C), in which the surgeon changed his decision based on the intraoperative radiograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final LIV matched the preoperative plan in 57% of cases, but changes occurred in 43%, particularly for Lenke 1A curves (47.5%). Two radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups: LIV-CSVL (Central Sacral Vertical Line) (p = 0.04) and LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02). Logistic regression indicated Lenke lumbar modifiers A and B significantly increased the likelihood of intraoperative LIV changes (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs substantially impact LIV selection in AIS surgery, especially in Lenke 1A and B curves where selective thoracic fusion is considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; retrospective cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiograph influence distal fusion level selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?
Background: The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to optimize functional and radiological outcomes. Despite established guidelines, the selection strategies vary widely among surgeons. This study aimed to assess how often prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs influence LIV selection. The main hypothesis is that uninstrumented intraoperative radiographs lead to a more conservative selection of the LIV level during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
Methods: A total of 139 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively analyzed. Preoperative fusion levels were determined, by the staff, six months before surgery using 3D EOS low dose stereoradiography (standing and lateral bending) and supine frontal radiographs. The final LIV chosen during surgery was recorded and compared to the planned one. Frontal radiological parameters (preoperative and intraoperative) were compared between the group "no change" (NC) and the group "change" (C), in which the surgeon changed his decision based on the intraoperative radiograph.
Results: The final LIV matched the preoperative plan in 57% of cases, but changes occurred in 43%, particularly for Lenke 1A curves (47.5%). Two radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups: LIV-CSVL (Central Sacral Vertical Line) (p = 0.04) and LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02). Logistic regression indicated Lenke lumbar modifiers A and B significantly increased the likelihood of intraoperative LIV changes (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion: Prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs substantially impact LIV selection in AIS surgery, especially in Lenke 1A and B curves where selective thoracic fusion is considered.
期刊介绍:
Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.