术中俯卧位无器械额位x线片影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术远端融合位选择吗?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
François Luc, Simon Arvati, Nicolas Mainard, Anne-Laure Simon, Mourad Ould-Slimane, Brice Ilharreborde
{"title":"术中俯卧位无器械额位x线片影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术远端融合位选择吗?","authors":"François Luc, Simon Arvati, Nicolas Mainard, Anne-Laure Simon, Mourad Ould-Slimane, Brice Ilharreborde","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to optimize functional and radiological outcomes. Despite established guidelines, the selection strategies vary widely among surgeons. This study aimed to assess how often prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs influence LIV selection. The main hypothesis is that uninstrumented intraoperative radiographs lead to a more conservative selection of the LIV level during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively analyzed. Preoperative fusion levels were determined, by the staff, six months before surgery using 3D EOS low dose stereoradiography (standing and lateral bending) and supine frontal radiographs. The final LIV chosen during surgery was recorded and compared to the planned one. Frontal radiological parameters (preoperative and intraoperative) were compared between the group \"no change\" (NC) and the group \"change\" (C), in which the surgeon changed his decision based on the intraoperative radiograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final LIV matched the preoperative plan in 57% of cases, but changes occurred in 43%, particularly for Lenke 1A curves (47.5%). Two radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups: LIV-CSVL (Central Sacral Vertical Line) (p = 0.04) and LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02). Logistic regression indicated Lenke lumbar modifiers A and B significantly increased the likelihood of intraoperative LIV changes (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs substantially impact LIV selection in AIS surgery, especially in Lenke 1A and B curves where selective thoracic fusion is considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; retrospective cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiograph influence distal fusion level selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?\",\"authors\":\"François Luc, Simon Arvati, Nicolas Mainard, Anne-Laure Simon, Mourad Ould-Slimane, Brice Ilharreborde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to optimize functional and radiological outcomes. Despite established guidelines, the selection strategies vary widely among surgeons. This study aimed to assess how often prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs influence LIV selection. The main hypothesis is that uninstrumented intraoperative radiographs lead to a more conservative selection of the LIV level during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 139 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively analyzed. Preoperative fusion levels were determined, by the staff, six months before surgery using 3D EOS low dose stereoradiography (standing and lateral bending) and supine frontal radiographs. The final LIV chosen during surgery was recorded and compared to the planned one. Frontal radiological parameters (preoperative and intraoperative) were compared between the group \\\"no change\\\" (NC) and the group \\\"change\\\" (C), in which the surgeon changed his decision based on the intraoperative radiograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final LIV matched the preoperative plan in 57% of cases, but changes occurred in 43%, particularly for Lenke 1A curves (47.5%). Two radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups: LIV-CSVL (Central Sacral Vertical Line) (p = 0.04) and LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02). Logistic regression indicated Lenke lumbar modifiers A and B significantly increased the likelihood of intraoperative LIV changes (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs substantially impact LIV selection in AIS surgery, especially in Lenke 1A and B curves where selective thoracic fusion is considered.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; retrospective cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)手术中,选择最低固定椎体(LIV)是优化功能和放射预后的关键。尽管有既定的指导方针,但外科医生的选择策略差异很大。本研究旨在评估术中俯卧位无器械额位x线片对LIV选择的影响。主要的假设是,在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术中,术中无器械的x线片导致了更保守的LIV水平选择。方法:对139例AIS后路脊柱融合术患者进行前瞻性分析。术前融合水平由工作人员在手术前6个月通过3D EOS低剂量立体放射摄影(站立和侧屈)和仰卧位正位x线片确定。记录手术中选择的最终LIV,并与计划的LIV进行比较。比较“未改变”组(NC)和“改变”组(C)的术前和术中放射学参数。在“改变”组中,外科医生根据术中x线片改变了他的决定。结果:57%的患者的最终LIV符合术前计划,但43%的患者发生了变化,尤其是Lenke 1A曲线(47.5%)。两组间影像学参数有显著差异:LIV- csvl(骶中央垂直线)(p = 0.04)和LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02)。Logistic回归显示Lenke腰椎改良剂A和B显著增加术中LIV改变的可能性(p = 0.008和p = 0.01)。结论:术中俯卧位无固定额位x线片对AIS手术中LIV的选择有很大影响,特别是在Lenke 1A和B曲线中,考虑选择性胸椎融合。证据等级:III;回顾性队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiograph influence distal fusion level selection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Background: The selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery to optimize functional and radiological outcomes. Despite established guidelines, the selection strategies vary widely among surgeons. This study aimed to assess how often prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs influence LIV selection. The main hypothesis is that uninstrumented intraoperative radiographs lead to a more conservative selection of the LIV level during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Methods: A total of 139 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS were prospectively analyzed. Preoperative fusion levels were determined, by the staff, six months before surgery using 3D EOS low dose stereoradiography (standing and lateral bending) and supine frontal radiographs. The final LIV chosen during surgery was recorded and compared to the planned one. Frontal radiological parameters (preoperative and intraoperative) were compared between the group "no change" (NC) and the group "change" (C), in which the surgeon changed his decision based on the intraoperative radiograph.

Results: The final LIV matched the preoperative plan in 57% of cases, but changes occurred in 43%, particularly for Lenke 1A curves (47.5%). Two radiographic parameters significantly differed between groups: LIV-CSVL (Central Sacral Vertical Line) (p = 0.04) and LIV + 1-CSVL (p = 0.02). Logistic regression indicated Lenke lumbar modifiers A and B significantly increased the likelihood of intraoperative LIV changes (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively).

Conclusion: Prone uninstrumented intraoperative frontal radiographs substantially impact LIV selection in AIS surgery, especially in Lenke 1A and B curves where selective thoracic fusion is considered.

Level of evidence: III; retrospective cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信