J Choi, C H Park, H Lim, S Kwon, T W Koo, Y Ryu, S Cho, S G Kim, S Lee, H Huh, D K Kim, S Lee, J C Lee
{"title":"专家参与的持续肾替代治疗设备开发:通过人因工程解决用户需求。","authors":"J Choi, C H Park, H Lim, S Kwon, T W Koo, Y Ryu, S Cho, S G Kim, S Lee, H Huh, D K Kim, S Lee, J C Lee","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) devices are essential for critically ill patients but present significant usability challenges that create use-related risks affecting patient safety. This study applied expert-involved usability engineering to develop a user-centered CRRT device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-phase study engaged 233 experts: Phase 1 assessed user needs through an online survey (<i>n</i> = 204) identifying use-related risks. Phase 2 developed and iteratively refined a CRRT prototype through expert review (<i>n</i> = 8) and heuristic evaluation (<i>n</i> = 5). Phase 3 validated the final prototype with ICU nurses (<i>n</i> = 16) through task performance in simulated ICU environments. Main outcomes included user satisfaction scores and use error observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 identified user needs and use-related risks, which were translated into user interface requirements. The initial prototype was developed and refined after iterative usability tests. The final prototype demonstrated high satisfaction scores: Overall User Experience 4.29 ± 0.53, Ease of Use 4.23 ± 0.50, and Comparative Assessment 3.56 ± 0.72. The validation test confirmed effective mitigation of use-related risks. Eight use errors and 48 use difficulties were identified for further refinement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic expert involvement in usability engineering successfully developed a CRRT device that effectively mitigated use-related risks while achieving high user satisfaction, demonstrating the value of expert integration in medical device development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert-involved continuous renal replacement therapy device development: addressing user needs through human factors engineering.\",\"authors\":\"J Choi, C H Park, H Lim, S Kwon, T W Koo, Y Ryu, S Cho, S G Kim, S Lee, H Huh, D K Kim, S Lee, J C Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) devices are essential for critically ill patients but present significant usability challenges that create use-related risks affecting patient safety. This study applied expert-involved usability engineering to develop a user-centered CRRT device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-phase study engaged 233 experts: Phase 1 assessed user needs through an online survey (<i>n</i> = 204) identifying use-related risks. Phase 2 developed and iteratively refined a CRRT prototype through expert review (<i>n</i> = 8) and heuristic evaluation (<i>n</i> = 5). Phase 3 validated the final prototype with ICU nurses (<i>n</i> = 16) through task performance in simulated ICU environments. Main outcomes included user satisfaction scores and use error observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 identified user needs and use-related risks, which were translated into user interface requirements. The initial prototype was developed and refined after iterative usability tests. The final prototype demonstrated high satisfaction scores: Overall User Experience 4.29 ± 0.53, Ease of Use 4.23 ± 0.50, and Comparative Assessment 3.56 ± 0.72. The validation test confirmed effective mitigation of use-related risks. Eight use errors and 48 use difficulties were identified for further refinement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic expert involvement in usability engineering successfully developed a CRRT device that effectively mitigated use-related risks while achieving high user satisfaction, demonstrating the value of expert integration in medical device development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expert-involved continuous renal replacement therapy device development: addressing user needs through human factors engineering.
Background: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) devices are essential for critically ill patients but present significant usability challenges that create use-related risks affecting patient safety. This study applied expert-involved usability engineering to develop a user-centered CRRT device.
Methods: A three-phase study engaged 233 experts: Phase 1 assessed user needs through an online survey (n = 204) identifying use-related risks. Phase 2 developed and iteratively refined a CRRT prototype through expert review (n = 8) and heuristic evaluation (n = 5). Phase 3 validated the final prototype with ICU nurses (n = 16) through task performance in simulated ICU environments. Main outcomes included user satisfaction scores and use error observations.
Results: Phase 1 identified user needs and use-related risks, which were translated into user interface requirements. The initial prototype was developed and refined after iterative usability tests. The final prototype demonstrated high satisfaction scores: Overall User Experience 4.29 ± 0.53, Ease of Use 4.23 ± 0.50, and Comparative Assessment 3.56 ± 0.72. The validation test confirmed effective mitigation of use-related risks. Eight use errors and 48 use difficulties were identified for further refinement.
Conclusions: Systematic expert involvement in usability engineering successfully developed a CRRT device that effectively mitigated use-related risks while achieving high user satisfaction, demonstrating the value of expert integration in medical device development.