复苏主动脉球囊闭塞(REBOA)能力和训练的战区评估。

Q3 Medicine
Alex Y Koo, Jerry Hu, Kyle S Couperus, Jamie Eastman, Thomas Kwolek, Kyle N Remick
{"title":"复苏主动脉球囊闭塞(REBOA)能力和训练的战区评估。","authors":"Alex Y Koo, Jerry Hu, Kyle S Couperus, Jamie Eastman, Thomas Kwolek, Kyle N Remick","doi":"10.55460/VOEM-ODN1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular technology indi-cated for temporarily controlling traumatic life-threatening, noncompressible abdominal, truncal, or pelvic hemorrhage. Through percutaneous access or cut-down to the femoral artery, an intra-aortic balloon catheter is fed into the aorta and inflated, occluding distal blood flow and, thus, bleeding. To determine specific barriers to REBOA in deployed environments, we conducted a quality improvement project and survey of ER-REBOA® placement and monitoring capabilities at four medical treatment locations in Iraq and Kuwait during the spring of 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary objective was to evaluate each in-theater medical site's ability to deploy REBOA, which was defined as having a provider capable of placing REBOA and the minimum equipment necessary. The investigators interviewed providers and through self-reported surveys, determined the personnel capable of placing a REBOA. REBOA equipment and monitoring equipment were identified through direct inspection of sites and interviews with logistical and equipment staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 113 individuals participated in the evaluation and training. Three of the four sites had the minimum training and equipment requirements to complete the procedure: one REBOA-capable provider, an unexpired ER-REBOA® device, and an unexpired introducer catheter kit. Overall, 6 out of 32 physicians (18.7%) were capable of placing an ER-REBOA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This deployed site survey demonstrates that the minimal requirements and personnel for ER-REBOA placement were met at most studied locations in 2019. However, improvements in pre-deployment training of select medical personnel in REBOA and arterial blood pressure monitoring are recommended to ensure adequate resourcing and redundancy in training.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Theater Assessment of Resuscitative Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Capabilities and Training.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Y Koo, Jerry Hu, Kyle S Couperus, Jamie Eastman, Thomas Kwolek, Kyle N Remick\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/VOEM-ODN1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular technology indi-cated for temporarily controlling traumatic life-threatening, noncompressible abdominal, truncal, or pelvic hemorrhage. Through percutaneous access or cut-down to the femoral artery, an intra-aortic balloon catheter is fed into the aorta and inflated, occluding distal blood flow and, thus, bleeding. To determine specific barriers to REBOA in deployed environments, we conducted a quality improvement project and survey of ER-REBOA® placement and monitoring capabilities at four medical treatment locations in Iraq and Kuwait during the spring of 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary objective was to evaluate each in-theater medical site's ability to deploy REBOA, which was defined as having a provider capable of placing REBOA and the minimum equipment necessary. The investigators interviewed providers and through self-reported surveys, determined the personnel capable of placing a REBOA. REBOA equipment and monitoring equipment were identified through direct inspection of sites and interviews with logistical and equipment staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 113 individuals participated in the evaluation and training. Three of the four sites had the minimum training and equipment requirements to complete the procedure: one REBOA-capable provider, an unexpired ER-REBOA® device, and an unexpired introducer catheter kit. Overall, 6 out of 32 physicians (18.7%) were capable of placing an ER-REBOA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This deployed site survey demonstrates that the minimal requirements and personnel for ER-REBOA placement were met at most studied locations in 2019. However, improvements in pre-deployment training of select medical personnel in REBOA and arterial blood pressure monitoring are recommended to ensure adequate resourcing and redundancy in training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"32-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/VOEM-ODN1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/VOEM-ODN1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复苏血管内球囊阻断主动脉(REBOA)是一种血管内技术,用于暂时控制创伤性危及生命的、不可压缩的腹部、截骨或盆腔出血。通过经皮进入或切开股动脉,将主动脉内球囊导管送入主动脉并充气,阻塞远端血流,从而导致出血。为了确定部署环境中REBOA的具体障碍,我们于2019年春季在伊拉克和科威特的四个医疗地点进行了质量改进项目和ER-REBOA®安置和监测能力调查。方法:主要目的是评估每个战区医疗站点部署REBOA的能力,其定义为具有能够放置REBOA和最低必要设备的供应商。调查人员与提供者面谈,并通过自我报告的调查,确定有能力放置REBOA的人员。通过直接视察场址和与后勤和设备工作人员的面谈,确定了实地监测中心的设备和监测设备。结果:共有113人参加了评估和培训。四个地点中的三个具有完成该程序的最低培训和设备要求:一个具有reboa能力的提供者,一个未过期的ER-REBOA®设备和一个未过期的引入导管套件。总的来说,32名医生中有6名(18.7%)能够放置ER-REBOA。结论:本次部署的现场调查表明,2019年大多数研究地点都满足了ER-REBOA安置的最低要求和人员。但是,建议改进部署前对部分医务人员的部署前培训和动脉血压监测,以确保充足的资源和培训冗余。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In-Theater Assessment of Resuscitative Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Capabilities and Training.

Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular technology indi-cated for temporarily controlling traumatic life-threatening, noncompressible abdominal, truncal, or pelvic hemorrhage. Through percutaneous access or cut-down to the femoral artery, an intra-aortic balloon catheter is fed into the aorta and inflated, occluding distal blood flow and, thus, bleeding. To determine specific barriers to REBOA in deployed environments, we conducted a quality improvement project and survey of ER-REBOA® placement and monitoring capabilities at four medical treatment locations in Iraq and Kuwait during the spring of 2019.

Methods: The primary objective was to evaluate each in-theater medical site's ability to deploy REBOA, which was defined as having a provider capable of placing REBOA and the minimum equipment necessary. The investigators interviewed providers and through self-reported surveys, determined the personnel capable of placing a REBOA. REBOA equipment and monitoring equipment were identified through direct inspection of sites and interviews with logistical and equipment staff.

Results: A total of 113 individuals participated in the evaluation and training. Three of the four sites had the minimum training and equipment requirements to complete the procedure: one REBOA-capable provider, an unexpired ER-REBOA® device, and an unexpired introducer catheter kit. Overall, 6 out of 32 physicians (18.7%) were capable of placing an ER-REBOA.

Conclusion: This deployed site survey demonstrates that the minimal requirements and personnel for ER-REBOA placement were met at most studied locations in 2019. However, improvements in pre-deployment training of select medical personnel in REBOA and arterial blood pressure monitoring are recommended to ensure adequate resourcing and redundancy in training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信