Duncan Mark Carlton, Cole S Jordan, Matthew Christensen, Kevin J Matthews, Blaine Dassero, Gregory J Zarow, Samuel Walther, Alec D Emerling, Russell Wier, Jonathan D Auten
{"title":"院前全血采集技术中6.5“串珠扎带、10”伞绳和操作人员格式塔的准确性","authors":"Duncan Mark Carlton, Cole S Jordan, Matthew Christensen, Kevin J Matthews, Blaine Dassero, Gregory J Zarow, Samuel Walther, Alec D Emerling, Russell Wier, Jonathan D Auten","doi":"10.55460/BO33-5BSJ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood reduces mortality more effectively than blood component therapy in treating trauma. When cold-stored low-titer Type O whole blood (CS-LTOWB) is not available in austere environments, a walking blood bank (WBB) strategy is employed, with blood drawn from a local, pre-screened donor. Proper blood bag volume is essential for avoiding citrate-related complications; however, the optimal method for determining the correct blood bag volume is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Novices (n=65) and experts (n=10) at the 1st Marine Division each filled blood bags with the goal of hitting the target volume (450mL ±10%) using the 6.5\" beaded cable tie (BC), 10\" paracord (PC), and operator gestalt (OG) techniques. Filled bags were weighed on a digital scale. Correct fills, underfills, and overfills were assessed using nonparametric statistics at P=.05. Subjective assessments were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For novices, OG achieved the highest rate of correct fills (69%), significantly outperforming BC (37%, P=.001) and PC (52%, P=.05). In experts, PC had the highest rate of correct fills (80%), though not significantly different from OG (70%, P=.59) or BC (50%, P=.08). OG was rated highest and was preferred by both groups. BC performed worst in objective and subjective measures for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BC performed poorly on all assessments and should be avoided. OG was generally superior to BC and PC, but was still suboptimal, with ~30% incorrect fills study-wide. Present findings demonstrate the need for better methods for determining donor blood bag fill volume to preserve the life of the wounded warfighter in WBB scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of 6.5\\\" Beaded Cable Tie, 10\\\" Paracord, and Operator Gestalt in Prehospital Whole Blood Collection Techniques in Filling Donor Blood Bags to Target Volume.\",\"authors\":\"Duncan Mark Carlton, Cole S Jordan, Matthew Christensen, Kevin J Matthews, Blaine Dassero, Gregory J Zarow, Samuel Walther, Alec D Emerling, Russell Wier, Jonathan D Auten\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/BO33-5BSJ\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood reduces mortality more effectively than blood component therapy in treating trauma. When cold-stored low-titer Type O whole blood (CS-LTOWB) is not available in austere environments, a walking blood bank (WBB) strategy is employed, with blood drawn from a local, pre-screened donor. Proper blood bag volume is essential for avoiding citrate-related complications; however, the optimal method for determining the correct blood bag volume is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Novices (n=65) and experts (n=10) at the 1st Marine Division each filled blood bags with the goal of hitting the target volume (450mL ±10%) using the 6.5\\\" beaded cable tie (BC), 10\\\" paracord (PC), and operator gestalt (OG) techniques. Filled bags were weighed on a digital scale. Correct fills, underfills, and overfills were assessed using nonparametric statistics at P=.05. Subjective assessments were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For novices, OG achieved the highest rate of correct fills (69%), significantly outperforming BC (37%, P=.001) and PC (52%, P=.05). In experts, PC had the highest rate of correct fills (80%), though not significantly different from OG (70%, P=.59) or BC (50%, P=.08). OG was rated highest and was preferred by both groups. BC performed worst in objective and subjective measures for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BC performed poorly on all assessments and should be avoided. OG was generally superior to BC and PC, but was still suboptimal, with ~30% incorrect fills study-wide. Present findings demonstrate the need for better methods for determining donor blood bag fill volume to preserve the life of the wounded warfighter in WBB scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/BO33-5BSJ\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/BO33-5BSJ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of 6.5" Beaded Cable Tie, 10" Paracord, and Operator Gestalt in Prehospital Whole Blood Collection Techniques in Filling Donor Blood Bags to Target Volume.
Background: Whole blood reduces mortality more effectively than blood component therapy in treating trauma. When cold-stored low-titer Type O whole blood (CS-LTOWB) is not available in austere environments, a walking blood bank (WBB) strategy is employed, with blood drawn from a local, pre-screened donor. Proper blood bag volume is essential for avoiding citrate-related complications; however, the optimal method for determining the correct blood bag volume is unclear.
Methods: Novices (n=65) and experts (n=10) at the 1st Marine Division each filled blood bags with the goal of hitting the target volume (450mL ±10%) using the 6.5" beaded cable tie (BC), 10" paracord (PC), and operator gestalt (OG) techniques. Filled bags were weighed on a digital scale. Correct fills, underfills, and overfills were assessed using nonparametric statistics at P=.05. Subjective assessments were also collected.
Results: For novices, OG achieved the highest rate of correct fills (69%), significantly outperforming BC (37%, P=.001) and PC (52%, P=.05). In experts, PC had the highest rate of correct fills (80%), though not significantly different from OG (70%, P=.59) or BC (50%, P=.08). OG was rated highest and was preferred by both groups. BC performed worst in objective and subjective measures for both groups.
Conclusion: BC performed poorly on all assessments and should be avoided. OG was generally superior to BC and PC, but was still suboptimal, with ~30% incorrect fills study-wide. Present findings demonstrate the need for better methods for determining donor blood bag fill volume to preserve the life of the wounded warfighter in WBB scenarios.