在俯卧位和半坐位以及被动和主动状态下,神经动力活动对膝关节伸角的直接影响:交叉试验。

IF 1.4 Q3 REHABILITATION
Alexis Michalak, André Gillibert, Marine Garyga, Jean-Michel Brismée, Timothée Gillot
{"title":"在俯卧位和半坐位以及被动和主动状态下,神经动力活动对膝关节伸角的直接影响:交叉试验。","authors":"Alexis Michalak, André Gillibert, Marine Garyga, Jean-Michel Brismée, Timothée Gillot","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the immediate physiological effect of sliding neurodynamic mobilization on passive knee extension angle in slump position versus half-seated position and active setting versus passive setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cross-over trial in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three tests were performed: Passive Knee Extension in slump position (PKE-Slump), Passive Knee Extension in supine position (PKE-Supine) and Finger-to-Floor Distance (FFD). The primary outcome was the difference in knee extension angle between slump position (intervention) and half-seated position (control). The secondary outcome was the difference in knee extension angle between active setting and passive setting. Outcomes were compared by paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight healthy subjects (32 women) with a mean ± SD age of 21.6 ± 2.9 years, were included. For PKE-Slump, the mean ± SD angle was 156.4° ± 11.8 in half-seated position and 158.7° ± 13.0 in slump position, with a mean difference of +2.31° (95 %CI: -0.24 to +4.86, p = 0.08). For PKE-Supine, the mean ± SD angle was 143.0° ± 15.4 in half-seated position and 146.2° ± 15.2 in slump position, with a mean difference of +3.22° (95 % CI: -0.29 to +6.16, p = 0.03). For FFD, the mean + SD value was 0.63 ± 13.18 cm in half-seated position and -0.40 ± 11.48 cm in slump position, with a mean difference of -1.03 cm (95 % CI: -2.15 to +0.10, p = 0.07). No significant difference was found between active and passive setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An immediate effect of neurodynamic sliding mobilization was observed on knee extension angle in half-seated position and in slump position. No significant difference of knee extension angle was shown between the two positions or between the two settings. Both active and passive neural mobilisation appeared to achieve similar clinical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"44 ","pages":"833-840"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate effect of neurodynamic mobilization on knee extension angle in slump position and half-seated position and in passive and active settings: a cross-over trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Michalak, André Gillibert, Marine Garyga, Jean-Michel Brismée, Timothée Gillot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the immediate physiological effect of sliding neurodynamic mobilization on passive knee extension angle in slump position versus half-seated position and active setting versus passive setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, cross-over trial in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three tests were performed: Passive Knee Extension in slump position (PKE-Slump), Passive Knee Extension in supine position (PKE-Supine) and Finger-to-Floor Distance (FFD). The primary outcome was the difference in knee extension angle between slump position (intervention) and half-seated position (control). The secondary outcome was the difference in knee extension angle between active setting and passive setting. Outcomes were compared by paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight healthy subjects (32 women) with a mean ± SD age of 21.6 ± 2.9 years, were included. For PKE-Slump, the mean ± SD angle was 156.4° ± 11.8 in half-seated position and 158.7° ± 13.0 in slump position, with a mean difference of +2.31° (95 %CI: -0.24 to +4.86, p = 0.08). For PKE-Supine, the mean ± SD angle was 143.0° ± 15.4 in half-seated position and 146.2° ± 15.2 in slump position, with a mean difference of +3.22° (95 % CI: -0.29 to +6.16, p = 0.03). For FFD, the mean + SD value was 0.63 ± 13.18 cm in half-seated position and -0.40 ± 11.48 cm in slump position, with a mean difference of -1.03 cm (95 % CI: -2.15 to +0.10, p = 0.07). No significant difference was found between active and passive setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An immediate effect of neurodynamic sliding mobilization was observed on knee extension angle in half-seated position and in slump position. No significant difference of knee extension angle was shown between the two positions or between the two settings. Both active and passive neural mobilisation appeared to achieve similar clinical results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"833-840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.07.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨滑动神经动力活动对俯卧位与半坐位、主动位与被动位被动膝关节伸角的直接生理影响。设计:健康受试者的前瞻性交叉试验。方法:采用俯卧位被动膝关节伸直(pke -坍落位)、仰卧位被动膝关节伸直(PKE-Supine)和指地距离(FFD) 3项试验。主要观察结果是膝关节伸直角度在俯卧位(干预)和半坐位(对照)之间的差异。次要观察结果是主动和被动两组患者膝关节伸展角度的差异。结果采用配对t检验进行比较。结果:纳入健康受试者58例(女性32例),平均±SD年龄21.6±2.9岁。对于pke -坍落度,半坐位的平均±SD角为156.4°±11.8,坍落度的平均±SD角为158.7°±13.0,平均差为+2.31°(95% CI: -0.24 ~ +4.86, p = 0.08)。对于pke -仰卧位,半坐位的平均±SD角为143.0°±15.4°,坍落位的平均±SD角为146.2°±15.2°,平均差为+3.22°(95% CI: -0.29 ~ +6.16, p = 0.03)。对于FFD,半坐位的平均+ SD值为0.63±13.18 cm,坍落位的平均+ SD值为-0.40±11.48 cm,平均差为-1.03 cm (95% CI: -2.15 ~ +0.10, p = 0.07)。主动设置与被动设置之间无显著差异。结论:神经动力滑动活动对半坐位和俯卧位的膝关节伸角有直接影响。两种体位或两种设置之间膝关节伸展角度无显著差异。主动和被动的神经活动似乎都取得了相似的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate effect of neurodynamic mobilization on knee extension angle in slump position and half-seated position and in passive and active settings: a cross-over trial.

Objectives: To investigate the immediate physiological effect of sliding neurodynamic mobilization on passive knee extension angle in slump position versus half-seated position and active setting versus passive setting.

Design: Prospective, cross-over trial in healthy subjects.

Methods: Three tests were performed: Passive Knee Extension in slump position (PKE-Slump), Passive Knee Extension in supine position (PKE-Supine) and Finger-to-Floor Distance (FFD). The primary outcome was the difference in knee extension angle between slump position (intervention) and half-seated position (control). The secondary outcome was the difference in knee extension angle between active setting and passive setting. Outcomes were compared by paired t tests.

Results: Fifty-eight healthy subjects (32 women) with a mean ± SD age of 21.6 ± 2.9 years, were included. For PKE-Slump, the mean ± SD angle was 156.4° ± 11.8 in half-seated position and 158.7° ± 13.0 in slump position, with a mean difference of +2.31° (95 %CI: -0.24 to +4.86, p = 0.08). For PKE-Supine, the mean ± SD angle was 143.0° ± 15.4 in half-seated position and 146.2° ± 15.2 in slump position, with a mean difference of +3.22° (95 % CI: -0.29 to +6.16, p = 0.03). For FFD, the mean + SD value was 0.63 ± 13.18 cm in half-seated position and -0.40 ± 11.48 cm in slump position, with a mean difference of -1.03 cm (95 % CI: -2.15 to +0.10, p = 0.07). No significant difference was found between active and passive setting.

Conclusion: An immediate effect of neurodynamic sliding mobilization was observed on knee extension angle in half-seated position and in slump position. No significant difference of knee extension angle was shown between the two positions or between the two settings. Both active and passive neural mobilisation appeared to achieve similar clinical results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信