下颌牙槽嵴劈裂扩张后植骨置入牙种植体时颊板骨折1例。

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Ahmad Albassal, Nuraldeen Maher Al-Khanati, Mazen Zenati
{"title":"下颌牙槽嵴劈裂扩张后植骨置入牙种植体时颊板骨折1例。","authors":"Ahmad Albassal, Nuraldeen Maher Al-Khanati, Mazen Zenati","doi":"10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and importance: </strong>After tooth extraction, horizontal bone loss and a reduction in the bucco-lingual ridge dimension may occur. This often necessitates bone augmentation to enable implant placement. For this reason, techniques such as ridge splitting and expansion have been developed; however, they present challenges in single-tooth sites and in the mandible. Complications such as buccal plate fractures remain a concern.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 49-year-old female, seeking fixed replacement of a missing mandibular molar, presented with a narrow alveolar ridge at the extraction site. Alveolar ridge splitting and expansion were performed to facilitate simultaneous implant placement. During the procedure, a buccal plate fracture occurred. Management did not involve plate fixation; instead, the resulting gap was filled with bone graft. Four months after the procedure, a significant net horizontal bone gain of 3.6 mm was observed. A follow-up at 10 months post-surgery showed successful clinical and radiographic results for both the implant and the prosthetic restoration.</p><p><strong>Clinical discussion: </strong>A buccal bone fracture occurred during implant placement following ridge splitting. Such fractures can result from mechanical stress exceeding the bone's structural integrity, particularly after splitting and expansion procedures. The mandibular buccal cortical plate is more susceptible to fracture. Management typically involves rigid fixation of the fractured plate with screws, especially in cases of complete fractures. In this report, bone grafting alone was sufficient. The fracture was incomplete, so no fixation was needed. The wound was securely sutured, which allowed for predictable graft containment and healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alveolar ridge splitting is an effective technique for managing narrow ridges and facilitating implant placement. However, complications such as buccal plate fractures may occur. Non-fixation can be considered a viable management strategy in cases where the fracture is incomplete, stable, and soft tissue closure is secure and free of tension. Despite potential challenges, alveolar split can be performed in mandibular single-tooth sites. Careful follow-up is crucial to ensure predictable healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48113,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","volume":"135 ","pages":"111933"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Buccal plate fracture during dental implant insertion after mandibular alveolar ridge splitting and expansion managed with bone grafting alone: A case report.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Albassal, Nuraldeen Maher Al-Khanati, Mazen Zenati\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and importance: </strong>After tooth extraction, horizontal bone loss and a reduction in the bucco-lingual ridge dimension may occur. This often necessitates bone augmentation to enable implant placement. For this reason, techniques such as ridge splitting and expansion have been developed; however, they present challenges in single-tooth sites and in the mandible. Complications such as buccal plate fractures remain a concern.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 49-year-old female, seeking fixed replacement of a missing mandibular molar, presented with a narrow alveolar ridge at the extraction site. Alveolar ridge splitting and expansion were performed to facilitate simultaneous implant placement. During the procedure, a buccal plate fracture occurred. Management did not involve plate fixation; instead, the resulting gap was filled with bone graft. Four months after the procedure, a significant net horizontal bone gain of 3.6 mm was observed. A follow-up at 10 months post-surgery showed successful clinical and radiographic results for both the implant and the prosthetic restoration.</p><p><strong>Clinical discussion: </strong>A buccal bone fracture occurred during implant placement following ridge splitting. Such fractures can result from mechanical stress exceeding the bone's structural integrity, particularly after splitting and expansion procedures. The mandibular buccal cortical plate is more susceptible to fracture. Management typically involves rigid fixation of the fractured plate with screws, especially in cases of complete fractures. In this report, bone grafting alone was sufficient. The fracture was incomplete, so no fixation was needed. The wound was securely sutured, which allowed for predictable graft containment and healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alveolar ridge splitting is an effective technique for managing narrow ridges and facilitating implant placement. However, complications such as buccal plate fractures may occur. Non-fixation can be considered a viable management strategy in cases where the fracture is incomplete, stable, and soft tissue closure is secure and free of tension. Despite potential challenges, alveolar split can be performed in mandibular single-tooth sites. Careful follow-up is crucial to ensure predictable healing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"111933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介及重要性:拔牙后,可能出现水平骨丢失和颊-舌脊尺寸减小。这通常需要骨增强来植入。为此,开发了脊裂和脊扩等技术;然而,他们提出了挑战,在单牙部位和下颌骨。颊板骨折等并发症仍然值得关注。病例介绍:一名49岁女性,寻求下颌磨牙的固定置换,在拔牙部位出现狭窄的牙槽嵴。进行牙槽嵴分裂和扩张,以方便同时放置种植体。在手术过程中,发生了颊板骨折。治疗不涉及钢板固定;取而代之的是,用骨移植物填充产生的间隙。术后4个月,观察到明显的净水平骨增重3.6 mm。术后10个月的随访显示种植体和假体修复的临床和影像学结果都很成功。临床讨论:牙槽嵴裂开后种植体放置时发生颊骨骨折。这种骨折可能是由于机械应力超过骨的结构完整性,特别是在劈裂和扩张手术后。下颌颊皮质钢板更易发生骨折。治疗通常包括用螺钉对骨折钢板进行刚性固定,特别是在完全性骨折的情况下。在本报告中,仅植骨就足够了。骨折不完全,因此不需要固定。伤口被牢固地缝合,这允许可预测的移植物控制和愈合。结论:牙槽嵴劈裂是治疗牙槽嵴狭窄和促进种植体植入的有效方法。然而,并发症如颊钢板骨折也可能发生。在骨折不完全、稳定且软组织闭合安全且无张力的情况下,不固定可以被认为是一种可行的治疗策略。尽管存在潜在的挑战,但牙槽分裂可以在下颌单牙部位进行。仔细的随访对于确保可预测的愈合至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Buccal plate fracture during dental implant insertion after mandibular alveolar ridge splitting and expansion managed with bone grafting alone: A case report.

Introduction and importance: After tooth extraction, horizontal bone loss and a reduction in the bucco-lingual ridge dimension may occur. This often necessitates bone augmentation to enable implant placement. For this reason, techniques such as ridge splitting and expansion have been developed; however, they present challenges in single-tooth sites and in the mandible. Complications such as buccal plate fractures remain a concern.

Case presentation: A 49-year-old female, seeking fixed replacement of a missing mandibular molar, presented with a narrow alveolar ridge at the extraction site. Alveolar ridge splitting and expansion were performed to facilitate simultaneous implant placement. During the procedure, a buccal plate fracture occurred. Management did not involve plate fixation; instead, the resulting gap was filled with bone graft. Four months after the procedure, a significant net horizontal bone gain of 3.6 mm was observed. A follow-up at 10 months post-surgery showed successful clinical and radiographic results for both the implant and the prosthetic restoration.

Clinical discussion: A buccal bone fracture occurred during implant placement following ridge splitting. Such fractures can result from mechanical stress exceeding the bone's structural integrity, particularly after splitting and expansion procedures. The mandibular buccal cortical plate is more susceptible to fracture. Management typically involves rigid fixation of the fractured plate with screws, especially in cases of complete fractures. In this report, bone grafting alone was sufficient. The fracture was incomplete, so no fixation was needed. The wound was securely sutured, which allowed for predictable graft containment and healing.

Conclusion: Alveolar ridge splitting is an effective technique for managing narrow ridges and facilitating implant placement. However, complications such as buccal plate fractures may occur. Non-fixation can be considered a viable management strategy in cases where the fracture is incomplete, stable, and soft tissue closure is secure and free of tension. Despite potential challenges, alveolar split can be performed in mandibular single-tooth sites. Careful follow-up is crucial to ensure predictable healing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1116
审稿时长
46 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信