{"title":"建设性优化的权利:数字服务法中推荐系统的公共利益方法。","authors":"L Naudts, N Helberger, M Veale, M Sax","doi":"10.1007/s10603-025-09586-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The technological promise of recommender systems should not be misused by those with decisional power over the infrastructural, data, and knowledge resources needed for their design. The ideal of personalization should not mask self-serving optimization. Instead, we propose that people, not only in their capacity as consumers but, more generally, as democratic citizens, have a legitimate claim to ensure that very large online platforms (or VLOPs) respect their interests within optimization processes through the content policy strategies and recommendation technologies they employ. To this end, this paper argues for, and develops, a right to constructive optimization that promotes people's effective enjoyment of fundamental rights and civic values in digital settings. The argument is structured as follows. First, the paper strengthens the claim that the largest online platforms perform a public function (although this is not the only way such functions can be performed). Second, drawing from the philosophy of Iris Marion Young, the paper identifies self-determination and self-development as key values recommenders should promote as part of this crucial function under conditions of inclusivity, political equality, reasonableness, and publicity. After having critiqued the EU Digital Services Act's approach toward regulating the function recommenders hold, the right to constructive optimization is concretized as an alternative normative benchmark and used as an interpretative lens to enrich ongoing legal initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":47436,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY","volume":"48 3","pages":"269-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Right to Constructive Optimization: A Public Interest Approach to Recommender Systems in the Digital Services Act.\",\"authors\":\"L Naudts, N Helberger, M Veale, M Sax\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10603-025-09586-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The technological promise of recommender systems should not be misused by those with decisional power over the infrastructural, data, and knowledge resources needed for their design. The ideal of personalization should not mask self-serving optimization. Instead, we propose that people, not only in their capacity as consumers but, more generally, as democratic citizens, have a legitimate claim to ensure that very large online platforms (or VLOPs) respect their interests within optimization processes through the content policy strategies and recommendation technologies they employ. To this end, this paper argues for, and develops, a right to constructive optimization that promotes people's effective enjoyment of fundamental rights and civic values in digital settings. The argument is structured as follows. First, the paper strengthens the claim that the largest online platforms perform a public function (although this is not the only way such functions can be performed). Second, drawing from the philosophy of Iris Marion Young, the paper identifies self-determination and self-development as key values recommenders should promote as part of this crucial function under conditions of inclusivity, political equality, reasonableness, and publicity. After having critiqued the EU Digital Services Act's approach toward regulating the function recommenders hold, the right to constructive optimization is concretized as an alternative normative benchmark and used as an interpretative lens to enrich ongoing legal initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"269-296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12433349/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-025-09586-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-025-09586-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
推荐系统的技术前景不应被那些对其设计所需的基础设施、数据和知识资源拥有决策权的人滥用。个性化的理想不应该掩盖自我服务的优化。相反,我们建议人们,不仅作为消费者,而且更广泛地说,作为民主公民,有合法的权利要求确保非常大的在线平台(或VLOPs)通过他们采用的内容政策策略和推荐技术,在优化过程中尊重他们的利益。为此,本文主张并发展了建设性优化权,以促进人们在数字环境中有效享受基本权利和公民价值观。论证的结构如下。首先,本文强化了最大的在线平台履行公共职能的说法(尽管这不是履行这些职能的唯一方式)。其次,根据Iris Marion Young的哲学,本文确定了自我决定和自我发展是推荐人在包容性、政治平等、合理性和公共性的条件下应该促进的关键价值观,作为这一关键功能的一部分。在对《欧盟数字服务法案》(EU Digital Services Act)规范推荐者所持功能的方法提出批评之后,建设性优化权被具体化为一种可替代的规范性基准,并被用作一种解释性视角,以丰富正在进行的法律举措。
A Right to Constructive Optimization: A Public Interest Approach to Recommender Systems in the Digital Services Act.
The technological promise of recommender systems should not be misused by those with decisional power over the infrastructural, data, and knowledge resources needed for their design. The ideal of personalization should not mask self-serving optimization. Instead, we propose that people, not only in their capacity as consumers but, more generally, as democratic citizens, have a legitimate claim to ensure that very large online platforms (or VLOPs) respect their interests within optimization processes through the content policy strategies and recommendation technologies they employ. To this end, this paper argues for, and develops, a right to constructive optimization that promotes people's effective enjoyment of fundamental rights and civic values in digital settings. The argument is structured as follows. First, the paper strengthens the claim that the largest online platforms perform a public function (although this is not the only way such functions can be performed). Second, drawing from the philosophy of Iris Marion Young, the paper identifies self-determination and self-development as key values recommenders should promote as part of this crucial function under conditions of inclusivity, political equality, reasonableness, and publicity. After having critiqued the EU Digital Services Act's approach toward regulating the function recommenders hold, the right to constructive optimization is concretized as an alternative normative benchmark and used as an interpretative lens to enrich ongoing legal initiatives.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Consumer Policy is a refereed, international journal which encompasses a broad range of issues concerned with consumer affairs. It looks at the consumer''s dependence on existing social and economic structures, helps to define the consumer''s interest, and discusses the ways in which consumer welfare can be fostered - or restrained - through actions and policies of consumers, industry, organizations, government, educational institutions, and the mass media.
The Journal of Consumer Policy publishes theoretical and empirical research on consumer and producer conduct, emphasizing the implications for consumers and increasing communication between the parties in the marketplace.
Articles cover consumer issues in law, economics, and behavioural sciences. Current areas of topical interest include the impact of new information technologies, the economics of information, the consequences of regulation or deregulation of markets, problems related to an increasing internationalization of trade and marketing practices, consumers in less affluent societies, the efficacy of economic cooperation, consumers and the environment, problems with products and services provided by the public sector, the setting of priorities by consumer organizations and agencies, gender issues, product safety and product liability, and the interaction between consumption and associated forms of behaviour such as work and leisure.
The Journal of Consumer Policy reports regularly on developments in legal policy with a bearing on consumer issues. It covers the integration of consumer law in the European Union and other transnational communities and analyzes trends in the application and implementation of consumer legislation through administrative agencies, courts, trade associations, and consumer organizations. It also considers the impact of consumer legislation on the supply side and discusses comparative legal approaches to issues of cons umer policy in different parts of the world.
The Journal of Consumer Policy informs readers about a broad array of consumer policy issues by publishing regularly both extended book reviews and brief, non-evaluative book notes on new publications in the field.
Officially cited as: J Consum Policy