与自我血糖监测相比,动态血糖监测在妊娠期糖尿病监测和改善控制中的应用

Q3 Medicine
Mohammad Sabah Siddiqui, Superior Kawale, Rohini Rokkam, Sarita Agrawal, Amritava Ghosh
{"title":"与自我血糖监测相比,动态血糖监测在妊娠期糖尿病监测和改善控制中的应用","authors":"Mohammad Sabah Siddiqui, Superior Kawale, Rohini Rokkam, Sarita Agrawal, Amritava Ghosh","doi":"10.59556/japi.73.1064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is hyperglycemia diagnosed for the first time during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. It often leads to neonatal complications. Effective management of GDM is crucial to mitigate such risks. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) vs self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in managing GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 18-month observational study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India, involving 65 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM. Thirty-two patients wore the flash glucose monitoring system (AGP group) and 33 performed SMBG (SMBG group). Blood glucose levels were monitored using AGP and SMBG, with data collected on fasting, postprandial glucose levels, and hypoglycemic events till 15 days after enrollment. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AGP group showed significant reductions in blood glucose levels across all measured times. Mean blood glucose concentrations decreased significantly in both groups from enrollment till 15 days, with no significant intergroup differences. The AGP group had a higher mean time in range (92 vs 90%) and lower time above range (4 vs 6%) compared to the SMBG group. Hypoglycemic events were fewer in the AGP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AGP demonstrated superior effectiveness in managing GDM by providing continuous glucose monitoring, improving glycemic control, and reducing hypoglycemic events compared to SMBG. AGP is recommended for better glucose management in GDM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"73 8","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Monitoring and Improved Control of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus When Compared to Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Sabah Siddiqui, Superior Kawale, Rohini Rokkam, Sarita Agrawal, Amritava Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.59556/japi.73.1064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is hyperglycemia diagnosed for the first time during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. It often leads to neonatal complications. Effective management of GDM is crucial to mitigate such risks. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) vs self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in managing GDM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 18-month observational study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India, involving 65 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM. Thirty-two patients wore the flash glucose monitoring system (AGP group) and 33 performed SMBG (SMBG group). Blood glucose levels were monitored using AGP and SMBG, with data collected on fasting, postprandial glucose levels, and hypoglycemic events till 15 days after enrollment. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AGP group showed significant reductions in blood glucose levels across all measured times. Mean blood glucose concentrations decreased significantly in both groups from enrollment till 15 days, with no significant intergroup differences. The AGP group had a higher mean time in range (92 vs 90%) and lower time above range (4 vs 6%) compared to the SMBG group. Hypoglycemic events were fewer in the AGP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AGP demonstrated superior effectiveness in managing GDM by providing continuous glucose monitoring, improving glycemic control, and reducing hypoglycemic events compared to SMBG. AGP is recommended for better glucose management in GDM patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"volume\":\"73 8\",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.73.1064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是在妊娠中期或晚期首次诊断的高血糖。它经常导致新生儿并发症。有效管理GDM对于减轻此类风险至关重要。本研究评估了动态血糖谱(AGP)与自我血糖监测(SMBG)在治疗GDM中的有效性。方法:这项为期18个月的观察性研究在印度全印度医学科学研究所进行,涉及65名诊断为GDM的孕妇。32例患者采用瞬时血糖监测系统(AGP组),33例患者采用SMBG (SMBG组)。使用AGP和SMBG监测血糖水平,收集空腹、餐后血糖水平和低血糖事件的数据,直到入组后15天。使用IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21进行统计分析。结果:AGP组在所有测量时间内血糖水平均显著降低。从入组到15 d,两组平均血糖浓度均显著降低,组间差异无统计学意义。与SMBG组相比,AGP组在范围内的平均时间更长(92 vs 90%),在范围以上的时间更短(4 vs 6%)。AGP组低血糖事件较少。结论:与SMBG相比,AGP通过提供持续的血糖监测、改善血糖控制和减少低血糖事件,在治疗GDM方面表现出优越的有效性。AGP被推荐用于改善GDM患者的血糖管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Monitoring and Improved Control of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus When Compared to Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose.

Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is hyperglycemia diagnosed for the first time during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. It often leads to neonatal complications. Effective management of GDM is crucial to mitigate such risks. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) vs self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in managing GDM.

Methods: This 18-month observational study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India, involving 65 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM. Thirty-two patients wore the flash glucose monitoring system (AGP group) and 33 performed SMBG (SMBG group). Blood glucose levels were monitored using AGP and SMBG, with data collected on fasting, postprandial glucose levels, and hypoglycemic events till 15 days after enrollment. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.

Results: The AGP group showed significant reductions in blood glucose levels across all measured times. Mean blood glucose concentrations decreased significantly in both groups from enrollment till 15 days, with no significant intergroup differences. The AGP group had a higher mean time in range (92 vs 90%) and lower time above range (4 vs 6%) compared to the SMBG group. Hypoglycemic events were fewer in the AGP group.

Conclusion: AGP demonstrated superior effectiveness in managing GDM by providing continuous glucose monitoring, improving glycemic control, and reducing hypoglycemic events compared to SMBG. AGP is recommended for better glucose management in GDM patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
509
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信