术前戒烟干预及其对戒烟和术后结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sultan Alhabdan, Abdalkareem Alashjaai, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi
{"title":"术前戒烟干预及其对戒烟和术后结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Sultan Alhabdan, Abdalkareem Alashjaai, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02409-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smoking is a significant risk factor for postoperative complications, including cardiovascular, pulmonary, and wound-related issues. Pre-operative smoking cessation is widely recommended to mitigate these risks, but the effectiveness of different interventions remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-operative smoking cessation interventions in reducing smoking rates and postoperative complications across various surgical settings. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases including Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, And CENTRAL, up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of pre-operative smoking cessation interventions were included. Data were extracted on intervention types, smoking cessation outcomes, and postoperative complications. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the results. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Out of 9,188 studies identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 4,763 patients. The pooled analysis revealed that pre-operative smoking cessation interventions probably increase the likelihood of smoking cessation before surgery (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.56; moderate-certainty evidence), although there was heterogeneity among the studies (I<sup>2 </sup>= 83.30%). Additionally, these interventions probably reduce overall postoperative complications by 27% (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94; moderate-certainty evidence), with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 49.06%). However, they may have a non-significant impact on wound-related complications (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.33-1.20; low-certainty evidence). Preoperative smoking cessation interventions probably increase short-term abstinence and likely to reduce the risk of overall postoperative complications. However, their impact on wound-related complications may be limited and remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative smoking cessation interventions and their effects on smoking abstinence and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sultan Alhabdan, Abdalkareem Alashjaai, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02409-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smoking is a significant risk factor for postoperative complications, including cardiovascular, pulmonary, and wound-related issues. Pre-operative smoking cessation is widely recommended to mitigate these risks, but the effectiveness of different interventions remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-operative smoking cessation interventions in reducing smoking rates and postoperative complications across various surgical settings. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases including Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, And CENTRAL, up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of pre-operative smoking cessation interventions were included. Data were extracted on intervention types, smoking cessation outcomes, and postoperative complications. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the results. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Out of 9,188 studies identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 4,763 patients. The pooled analysis revealed that pre-operative smoking cessation interventions probably increase the likelihood of smoking cessation before surgery (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.56; moderate-certainty evidence), although there was heterogeneity among the studies (I<sup>2 </sup>= 83.30%). Additionally, these interventions probably reduce overall postoperative complications by 27% (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94; moderate-certainty evidence), with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 49.06%). However, they may have a non-significant impact on wound-related complications (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.33-1.20; low-certainty evidence). Preoperative smoking cessation interventions probably increase short-term abstinence and likely to reduce the risk of overall postoperative complications. However, their impact on wound-related complications may be limited and remains uncertain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02409-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02409-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吸烟是术后并发症的重要危险因素,包括心血管、肺部和伤口相关问题。术前戒烟被广泛推荐以减轻这些风险,但不同干预措施的有效性仍不确定。本研究旨在评估术前戒烟干预在降低不同手术环境下的吸烟率和术后并发症方面的有效性。根据PRISMA指南,对截至2024年7月的Medline/PubMed、Embase、CINAHL和CENTRAL等数据库进行了全面的检索。纳入了评估术前戒烟干预措施有效性的随机对照试验(rct)。提取干预类型、戒烟结果和术后并发症的数据。使用Cochrane协作工具评估偏倚风险,并进行随机效应荟萃分析以汇总结果。使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。在确定的9188项研究中,24项符合纳入标准,包括4,763名患者。合并分析显示,术前戒烟干预可能会增加术前戒烟的可能性(RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.56;中等确定性证据),尽管研究之间存在异质性(I2 = 83.30%)。此外,这些干预措施可能减少27%的总体术后并发症(RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94;中等确定性证据),具有中等异质性(I2 = 49.06%)。然而,它们可能对伤口相关并发症没有显著影响(RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.33-1.20;低确定性证据)。术前戒烟干预可能增加短期戒断,并可能降低术后并发症的风险。然而,它们对伤口相关并发症的影响可能是有限的,并且仍然不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative smoking cessation interventions and their effects on smoking abstinence and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Smoking is a significant risk factor for postoperative complications, including cardiovascular, pulmonary, and wound-related issues. Pre-operative smoking cessation is widely recommended to mitigate these risks, but the effectiveness of different interventions remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-operative smoking cessation interventions in reducing smoking rates and postoperative complications across various surgical settings. A comprehensive search was conducted across databases including Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, And CENTRAL, up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness of pre-operative smoking cessation interventions were included. Data were extracted on intervention types, smoking cessation outcomes, and postoperative complications. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the results. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Out of 9,188 studies identified, 24 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 4,763 patients. The pooled analysis revealed that pre-operative smoking cessation interventions probably increase the likelihood of smoking cessation before surgery (RR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.53-2.56; moderate-certainty evidence), although there was heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 83.30%). Additionally, these interventions probably reduce overall postoperative complications by 27% (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.94; moderate-certainty evidence), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 49.06%). However, they may have a non-significant impact on wound-related complications (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.33-1.20; low-certainty evidence). Preoperative smoking cessation interventions probably increase short-term abstinence and likely to reduce the risk of overall postoperative complications. However, their impact on wound-related complications may be limited and remains uncertain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信