对ChatGPT可读性的评估产生了关于旅行健康风险的回应。

IF 1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zeynep Demirtaş Özyılmaz
{"title":"对ChatGPT可读性的评估产生了关于旅行健康风险的回应。","authors":"Zeynep Demirtaş Özyılmaz","doi":"10.5603/imh.104400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impressive advances in artificial intelligence have given travellers a new source of health information. AI-powered tools, such as ChatGPT, allow users to obtain health information in a fast and accessible way. The aim of this study was to assess the readability of ChatGPT responses to questions about health risks when travelling.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten Questions about the health risks when travelling in the \"Questions and Answers\" section of the World Health Organisation's website have been asked 10 times to ChatGPT. A total of 100 answers was obtained and analyzed for readability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± SD of Flesch Reading Ease was 35.82 ± 6.46, Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 13.25 ± 1.45, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook was 12.34 ± 1.29, Gunning Fog Index was 13.77 ± 1.34, Coleman-Liau Index was 14.52 ± 1.09, Automated Readability Index was 14.93 ± 1.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The readability of the answers produced by ChatGPT was 'difficult' and a college level education is required to understand the text. Lack of understanding of information can reduce the likelihood of travellers making good health decisions. To improve the understandability of ChatGPT responses, it may be useful to generate responses at a significantly lower reading level.</p>","PeriodicalId":45964,"journal":{"name":"International Maritime Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating of the readability of ChatGPT generated responses on travel health risks.\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Demirtaş Özyılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/imh.104400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impressive advances in artificial intelligence have given travellers a new source of health information. AI-powered tools, such as ChatGPT, allow users to obtain health information in a fast and accessible way. The aim of this study was to assess the readability of ChatGPT responses to questions about health risks when travelling.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten Questions about the health risks when travelling in the \\\"Questions and Answers\\\" section of the World Health Organisation's website have been asked 10 times to ChatGPT. A total of 100 answers was obtained and analyzed for readability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ± SD of Flesch Reading Ease was 35.82 ± 6.46, Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 13.25 ± 1.45, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook was 12.34 ± 1.29, Gunning Fog Index was 13.77 ± 1.34, Coleman-Liau Index was 14.52 ± 1.09, Automated Readability Index was 14.93 ± 1.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The readability of the answers produced by ChatGPT was 'difficult' and a college level education is required to understand the text. Lack of understanding of information can reduce the likelihood of travellers making good health decisions. To improve the understandability of ChatGPT responses, it may be useful to generate responses at a significantly lower reading level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Maritime Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Maritime Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.104400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Maritime Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.104400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工智能令人印象深刻的进步为旅行者提供了新的健康信息来源。ChatGPT等人工智能工具允许用户以快速和可访问的方式获取健康信息。本研究的目的是评估ChatGPT对旅行时健康风险问题的回答的可读性。资料和方法:在世界卫生组织网站的“问答”部分,关于旅行时的健康风险的十个问题已经被问了十次。共获得100个答案,并对其可读性进行分析。结果:Flesch Reading Ease的平均值±SD为35.82±6.46,Flesch- kincaid分级水平为13.25±1.45,Simple Measure of Gobbledygook为12.34±1.29,Gunning Fog指数为13.77±1.34,Coleman-Liau指数为14.52±1.09,Automated Readability指数为14.93±1.81。结论:ChatGPT产生的答案的可读性是“困难的”,并且需要大学水平的教育才能理解文本。缺乏对信息的了解会降低旅行者作出良好健康决定的可能性。为了提高ChatGPT响应的可理解性,在较低的阅读水平下生成响应可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating of the readability of ChatGPT generated responses on travel health risks.

Background: Impressive advances in artificial intelligence have given travellers a new source of health information. AI-powered tools, such as ChatGPT, allow users to obtain health information in a fast and accessible way. The aim of this study was to assess the readability of ChatGPT responses to questions about health risks when travelling.

Material and methods: Ten Questions about the health risks when travelling in the "Questions and Answers" section of the World Health Organisation's website have been asked 10 times to ChatGPT. A total of 100 answers was obtained and analyzed for readability.

Results: The mean ± SD of Flesch Reading Ease was 35.82 ± 6.46, Flesch-Kincaid grade level was 13.25 ± 1.45, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook was 12.34 ± 1.29, Gunning Fog Index was 13.77 ± 1.34, Coleman-Liau Index was 14.52 ± 1.09, Automated Readability Index was 14.93 ± 1.81.

Conclusions: The readability of the answers produced by ChatGPT was 'difficult' and a college level education is required to understand the text. Lack of understanding of information can reduce the likelihood of travellers making good health decisions. To improve the understandability of ChatGPT responses, it may be useful to generate responses at a significantly lower reading level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Maritime Health
International Maritime Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信