吻合器方法对机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘影响的回顾性研究。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kota Sugiura, Yoshihiro Ono, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Hiromichi Ito, Yosuke Inoue, Yu Takahashi
{"title":"吻合器方法对机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘影响的回顾性研究。","authors":"Kota Sugiura, Yoshihiro Ono, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Hiromichi Ito, Yosuke Inoue, Yu Takahashi","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12223-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, optimal techniques for pancreatic transection to minimize the risk of POPF have not been thoroughly elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of stapler-assisted pancreatic transection and reconstruction (stapler method) on the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) and to present the technical details of the stapler method, accompanied by supplementary video footage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) between October 2020 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into the stapler method group and the conventional method group, in which pancreatic transection was performed using a coagulation-based technique. The incidence and risk factors for CR-POPF were analyzed, and post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients who underwent RPD were included in this study, with 61 in the stapler method group and 73 in the conventional method group. The incidence of CR-POPF was significantly lower in the stapler method group compared to the conventional method group (13.1% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, body mass index was independently associated with an increased risk of CR-POPF (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57; p < 0.001), while the stapler method was associated with a significantly reduced risk (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016). Although postoperative serum amylase levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the stapler method group (578 U/L; IQR, 292-1107) than in the conventional method group (336 U/L; IQR, 242-830; p = 0.020), the incidence of PPAP did not significantly differ between the groups (stapler method: 1.6% vs. conventional method: 1.4%, p = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the stapler method may reduce the incidence of CR-POPF in RPD without increasing the risk of PPAP.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the stapler method on postoperative pancreatic fistula in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Kota Sugiura, Yoshihiro Ono, Kosuke Kobayashi, Atsushi Oba, Hiromichi Ito, Yosuke Inoue, Yu Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12223-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, optimal techniques for pancreatic transection to minimize the risk of POPF have not been thoroughly elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of stapler-assisted pancreatic transection and reconstruction (stapler method) on the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) and to present the technical details of the stapler method, accompanied by supplementary video footage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) between October 2020 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into the stapler method group and the conventional method group, in which pancreatic transection was performed using a coagulation-based technique. The incidence and risk factors for CR-POPF were analyzed, and post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 134 patients who underwent RPD were included in this study, with 61 in the stapler method group and 73 in the conventional method group. The incidence of CR-POPF was significantly lower in the stapler method group compared to the conventional method group (13.1% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, body mass index was independently associated with an increased risk of CR-POPF (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57; p < 0.001), while the stapler method was associated with a significantly reduced risk (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016). Although postoperative serum amylase levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the stapler method group (578 U/L; IQR, 292-1107) than in the conventional method group (336 U/L; IQR, 242-830; p = 0.020), the incidence of PPAP did not significantly differ between the groups (stapler method: 1.6% vs. conventional method: 1.4%, p = 1.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the stapler method may reduce the incidence of CR-POPF in RPD without increasing the risk of PPAP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12223-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12223-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后胰瘘(POPF)仍然是胰十二指肠切除术后的一个重要并发症。然而,胰腺横断以减少POPF风险的最佳技术尚未完全阐明。本研究旨在评估吻合器辅助胰腺横断重建(吻合器方法)对临床相关POPF (CR-POPF)发生率的影响,并介绍吻合器方法的技术细节,并伴有补充视频片段。方法:回顾性分析2020年10月至2024年12月期间接受机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)的患者。将患者分为吻合器组和常规方法组,常规方法组采用基于凝固的技术进行胰腺横断。分析CR-POPF的发生率和危险因素,并对胰腺切除术后急性胰腺炎(PPAP)进行评估。结果:本研究共纳入134例RPD患者,其中吻合器组61例,常规方法组73例。吻合器组CR-POPF发生率明显低于常规方法组(13.1%比31.5%,p = 0.014)。在多变量分析中,体重指数与CR-POPF风险增加独立相关(OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57; p)。结论:这些研究结果表明,订书机方法可以降低RPD中CR-POPF的发生率,而不会增加PPAP的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the stapler method on postoperative pancreatic fistula in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.

Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, optimal techniques for pancreatic transection to minimize the risk of POPF have not been thoroughly elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of stapler-assisted pancreatic transection and reconstruction (stapler method) on the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) and to present the technical details of the stapler method, accompanied by supplementary video footage.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) between October 2020 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into the stapler method group and the conventional method group, in which pancreatic transection was performed using a coagulation-based technique. The incidence and risk factors for CR-POPF were analyzed, and post-pancreatectomy acute pancreatitis (PPAP) was also evaluated.

Results: A total of 134 patients who underwent RPD were included in this study, with 61 in the stapler method group and 73 in the conventional method group. The incidence of CR-POPF was significantly lower in the stapler method group compared to the conventional method group (13.1% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, body mass index was independently associated with an increased risk of CR-POPF (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14-1.57; p < 0.001), while the stapler method was associated with a significantly reduced risk (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; p = 0.016). Although postoperative serum amylase levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher in the stapler method group (578 U/L; IQR, 292-1107) than in the conventional method group (336 U/L; IQR, 242-830; p = 0.020), the incidence of PPAP did not significantly differ between the groups (stapler method: 1.6% vs. conventional method: 1.4%, p = 1.000).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the stapler method may reduce the incidence of CR-POPF in RPD without increasing the risk of PPAP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信