肉瘤手术的技术方面-一项针对德国和瑞士肉瘤中心外科医生的外科调查。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Anne-Christine Zygmunt, Elif Yilmaz, Madelaine Hettler, Michael Ghadimi, Florian Bösch, Jens Jakob
{"title":"肉瘤手术的技术方面-一项针对德国和瑞士肉瘤中心外科医生的外科调查。","authors":"Anne-Christine Zygmunt, Elif Yilmaz, Madelaine Hettler, Michael Ghadimi, Florian Bösch, Jens Jakob","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03854-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgery is a substantial pillar of extremity sarcoma treatment. There are no standardized, evidence-based strategies to perform a wide R0 resection which is recommended by international and German guidelines. The aim of this study was to use a standardized questionnaire combined with a semi-structured interview to survey the reality of surgical care in German and Swiss sarcoma centers and establish a rationale for future prospective studies to improve postoperative outcome and oncological quality in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was developed based on a real case of a 32-year-old female patient with a locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the proximal thigh. We invited surgeons who were currently treating patients with extremity sarcomas at German and Swiss sarcoma centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 of 24 (62.5%) invited surgeons participated. Participants had a broad type of surgical training and specialization (e.g. general surgery n = 5, special visceral surgery n = 4, orthopedics and trauma surgery n = 8, vascular surgery n = 2, plastic surgery n = 3). Significant differences (agreement of less than 50%) were found in the planned resection margin at the skin level, the resection planes in other tissues and strategies towards critical structures such as nerves and vessels. Similarities (agreement above 80%) were found in regard to the placement of suction drains and subcutaneous closure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current survey shows relevant differences in surgical techniques among sarcoma surgeons at certified sarcoma centers. It is unclear to what extent these differences influence surgical morbidity and oncological outcome. Further studies should be planned to optimize and standardize sarcoma surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical aspects in sarcoma surgery - a surgical survey among surgeons at sarcoma centers in Germany and Switzerland.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Christine Zygmunt, Elif Yilmaz, Madelaine Hettler, Michael Ghadimi, Florian Bösch, Jens Jakob\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03854-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgery is a substantial pillar of extremity sarcoma treatment. There are no standardized, evidence-based strategies to perform a wide R0 resection which is recommended by international and German guidelines. The aim of this study was to use a standardized questionnaire combined with a semi-structured interview to survey the reality of surgical care in German and Swiss sarcoma centers and establish a rationale for future prospective studies to improve postoperative outcome and oncological quality in extremity sarcoma surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire was developed based on a real case of a 32-year-old female patient with a locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the proximal thigh. We invited surgeons who were currently treating patients with extremity sarcomas at German and Swiss sarcoma centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 of 24 (62.5%) invited surgeons participated. Participants had a broad type of surgical training and specialization (e.g. general surgery n = 5, special visceral surgery n = 4, orthopedics and trauma surgery n = 8, vascular surgery n = 2, plastic surgery n = 3). Significant differences (agreement of less than 50%) were found in the planned resection margin at the skin level, the resection planes in other tissues and strategies towards critical structures such as nerves and vessels. Similarities (agreement above 80%) were found in regard to the placement of suction drains and subcutaneous closure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current survey shows relevant differences in surgical techniques among sarcoma surgeons at certified sarcoma centers. It is unclear to what extent these differences influence surgical morbidity and oncological outcome. Further studies should be planned to optimize and standardize sarcoma surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03854-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03854-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手术是四肢肉瘤治疗的重要支柱。目前还没有标准化的、基于证据的策略来进行国际和德国指南推荐的大范围R0切除术。本研究的目的是使用标准化问卷结合半结构化访谈来调查德国和瑞士肉瘤中心的手术护理现状,并为未来的前瞻性研究建立理论基础,以改善四肢肉瘤手术的术后结果和肿瘤质量。方法:问卷调查是基于一个真实的32岁的女性患者,局部进展的大腿近端软组织肉瘤。我们邀请了目前在德国和瑞士肉瘤中心治疗四肢肉瘤患者的外科医生。结果:24名受邀外科医生中有15名(62.5%)参与。参与者接受了广泛的外科培训和专业知识(例如普通外科n = 5,特殊内脏外科n = 4,骨科和创伤外科n = 8,血管外科n = 2,整形外科n = 3)。在皮肤水平的计划切除边缘、其他组织的切除平面和针对关键结构(如神经和血管)的策略上发现了显著差异(一致性小于50%)。相似之处(一致性在80%以上)被发现在放置抽吸引流管和皮下闭合方面。结论:目前的调查显示了在经认证的肉瘤中心的肉瘤外科医生在手术技术上的相关差异。目前尚不清楚这些差异在多大程度上影响手术发病率和肿瘤预后。应计划进一步的研究以优化和规范肉瘤手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Technical aspects in sarcoma surgery - a surgical survey among surgeons at sarcoma centers in Germany and Switzerland.

Technical aspects in sarcoma surgery - a surgical survey among surgeons at sarcoma centers in Germany and Switzerland.

Technical aspects in sarcoma surgery - a surgical survey among surgeons at sarcoma centers in Germany and Switzerland.

Technical aspects in sarcoma surgery - a surgical survey among surgeons at sarcoma centers in Germany and Switzerland.

Purpose: Surgery is a substantial pillar of extremity sarcoma treatment. There are no standardized, evidence-based strategies to perform a wide R0 resection which is recommended by international and German guidelines. The aim of this study was to use a standardized questionnaire combined with a semi-structured interview to survey the reality of surgical care in German and Swiss sarcoma centers and establish a rationale for future prospective studies to improve postoperative outcome and oncological quality in extremity sarcoma surgery.

Methods: The questionnaire was developed based on a real case of a 32-year-old female patient with a locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma of the proximal thigh. We invited surgeons who were currently treating patients with extremity sarcomas at German and Swiss sarcoma centers.

Results: 15 of 24 (62.5%) invited surgeons participated. Participants had a broad type of surgical training and specialization (e.g. general surgery n = 5, special visceral surgery n = 4, orthopedics and trauma surgery n = 8, vascular surgery n = 2, plastic surgery n = 3). Significant differences (agreement of less than 50%) were found in the planned resection margin at the skin level, the resection planes in other tissues and strategies towards critical structures such as nerves and vessels. Similarities (agreement above 80%) were found in regard to the placement of suction drains and subcutaneous closure.

Conclusion: The current survey shows relevant differences in surgical techniques among sarcoma surgeons at certified sarcoma centers. It is unclear to what extent these differences influence surgical morbidity and oncological outcome. Further studies should be planned to optimize and standardize sarcoma surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信