Hadasa Kaufman , Nadav Rappoport , Amir Gilad , Michal Linial
{"title":"利用生物银行数据推进医学因果推理。","authors":"Hadasa Kaufman , Nadav Rappoport , Amir Gilad , Michal Linial","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Causal inference from observational medical record data is critical for advancing precision and personalization in healthcare. Recently, biobanks – collections of biological samples linked with genetic, lifestyle, environmental, and health-related data – have emerged as valuable resources for large-scale population studies. By integrating these resources, biobanks offer a harmonized repository of diverse data for each individual, capturing real-world medical events, including procedures, treatments, and diagnoses. However, these resources are often affected by confounding factors, selection biases, and missing information, posing significant challenges to drawing valid causal conclusions. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for drug development and medical decision-making, the growing availability of observational data highlights the need for robust causal inference methodologies. This study provides an overview of methods for inferring the effect of a treatment on an outcome from observational data applicable to biobank data, focusing on the unique challenges they address. Our objective is to introduce current methods used for causal discovery in observational medical data. We discuss classic and modern methodologies that offer significant opportunities alongside the difficulty in reaching causality. We cover statistical methods designed for large-scale biobanks that have the potential to improve clinical decision-making, guide public health policies, and drive further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104903"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing causal inference in medicine using biobank data\",\"authors\":\"Hadasa Kaufman , Nadav Rappoport , Amir Gilad , Michal Linial\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Causal inference from observational medical record data is critical for advancing precision and personalization in healthcare. Recently, biobanks – collections of biological samples linked with genetic, lifestyle, environmental, and health-related data – have emerged as valuable resources for large-scale population studies. By integrating these resources, biobanks offer a harmonized repository of diverse data for each individual, capturing real-world medical events, including procedures, treatments, and diagnoses. However, these resources are often affected by confounding factors, selection biases, and missing information, posing significant challenges to drawing valid causal conclusions. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for drug development and medical decision-making, the growing availability of observational data highlights the need for robust causal inference methodologies. This study provides an overview of methods for inferring the effect of a treatment on an outcome from observational data applicable to biobank data, focusing on the unique challenges they address. Our objective is to introduce current methods used for causal discovery in observational medical data. We discuss classic and modern methodologies that offer significant opportunities alongside the difficulty in reaching causality. We cover statistical methods designed for large-scale biobanks that have the potential to improve clinical decision-making, guide public health policies, and drive further research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104903\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001327\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425001327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing causal inference in medicine using biobank data
Causal inference from observational medical record data is critical for advancing precision and personalization in healthcare. Recently, biobanks – collections of biological samples linked with genetic, lifestyle, environmental, and health-related data – have emerged as valuable resources for large-scale population studies. By integrating these resources, biobanks offer a harmonized repository of diverse data for each individual, capturing real-world medical events, including procedures, treatments, and diagnoses. However, these resources are often affected by confounding factors, selection biases, and missing information, posing significant challenges to drawing valid causal conclusions. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for drug development and medical decision-making, the growing availability of observational data highlights the need for robust causal inference methodologies. This study provides an overview of methods for inferring the effect of a treatment on an outcome from observational data applicable to biobank data, focusing on the unique challenges they address. Our objective is to introduce current methods used for causal discovery in observational medical data. We discuss classic and modern methodologies that offer significant opportunities alongside the difficulty in reaching causality. We cover statistical methods designed for large-scale biobanks that have the potential to improve clinical decision-making, guide public health policies, and drive further research.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.