{"title":"神经病学治疗决策中的大型语言模型:范围综述。","authors":"Rushabh Shah, Fabrice Jotterand","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02254-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review evaluates the expanding role of large language models (LLMs) in neurology, an area drawing growing interest of researchers and clinicians alike. A substantial existing body of literature supports the efficacy of LLMs for diagnostic applications. However, clinicians' emerging point of interest now lies in understanding the applications of LLMs in guiding treatment decisions. Our study therefore aims to synthesize and evaluate existing neurological studies focused on LLMs in treatment decision-making. A comprehensive search was conducted in the electronic databases OVID/Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through September 18th, 2024. Inclusion criteria included original studies published within the last five years focused on evaluating the efficacy of LLMs in treatment decision-making in neurology. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y6N3E ). Four studies were identified. ChatGPT was the LLM utilized in each article, though varying in model versions. Each study demonstrated positive outcomes across varying metrics, with models generally aligning with clinician decisions. However, the lack of observed studies and variability of neurological topics limit the generalizability of these AI tools. This scoping review analyzes the existing body of evidence on LLMs in treatment decision-making in neurology. While current studies suggest potential to support clinical care, there is insufficient evidence at this stage to claim outcome improvement. Findings are not yet generalizable across neurological practice, as existing promise appears limited to narrow use cases. Prospective validation across subspecialties is needed to support broader clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Language Models in Neurology Treatment Decision-Making: a Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rushabh Shah, Fabrice Jotterand\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-025-02254-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This scoping review evaluates the expanding role of large language models (LLMs) in neurology, an area drawing growing interest of researchers and clinicians alike. A substantial existing body of literature supports the efficacy of LLMs for diagnostic applications. However, clinicians' emerging point of interest now lies in understanding the applications of LLMs in guiding treatment decisions. Our study therefore aims to synthesize and evaluate existing neurological studies focused on LLMs in treatment decision-making. A comprehensive search was conducted in the electronic databases OVID/Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through September 18th, 2024. Inclusion criteria included original studies published within the last five years focused on evaluating the efficacy of LLMs in treatment decision-making in neurology. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y6N3E ). Four studies were identified. ChatGPT was the LLM utilized in each article, though varying in model versions. Each study demonstrated positive outcomes across varying metrics, with models generally aligning with clinician decisions. However, the lack of observed studies and variability of neurological topics limit the generalizability of these AI tools. This scoping review analyzes the existing body of evidence on LLMs in treatment decision-making in neurology. While current studies suggest potential to support clinical care, there is insufficient evidence at this stage to claim outcome improvement. Findings are not yet generalizable across neurological practice, as existing promise appears limited to narrow use cases. Prospective validation across subspecialties is needed to support broader clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02254-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02254-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇综述评估了大型语言模型(llm)在神经病学中不断扩大的作用,这是一个吸引研究人员和临床医生越来越感兴趣的领域。大量现有文献支持llm在诊断应用中的有效性。然而,临床医生现在的兴趣点在于理解法学硕士在指导治疗决策中的应用。因此,我们的研究旨在综合和评估现有的神经学研究,重点关注llm在治疗决策中的作用。在OVID/Medline、Web of Science和Cochrane Library的电子数据库中进行了全面的检索,截止到2024年9月18日。纳入标准包括过去五年内发表的原始研究,重点是评估llm在神经病学治疗决策中的疗效。该方案已在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y6N3E)上注册。确定了四项研究。ChatGPT是每篇文章中使用的LLM,尽管模型版本有所不同。每项研究在不同的指标上都显示出积极的结果,模型通常与临床医生的决定一致。然而,缺乏观察性研究和神经学主题的可变性限制了这些人工智能工具的推广。本综述分析了llm在神经病学治疗决策中的现有证据。虽然目前的研究表明有可能支持临床护理,但现阶段没有足够的证据表明结果有所改善。研究结果还不能在整个神经学实践中推广,因为现有的前景似乎仅限于狭窄的用例。需要跨亚专科的前瞻性验证以支持更广泛的临床应用。
Large Language Models in Neurology Treatment Decision-Making: a Scoping Review.
This scoping review evaluates the expanding role of large language models (LLMs) in neurology, an area drawing growing interest of researchers and clinicians alike. A substantial existing body of literature supports the efficacy of LLMs for diagnostic applications. However, clinicians' emerging point of interest now lies in understanding the applications of LLMs in guiding treatment decisions. Our study therefore aims to synthesize and evaluate existing neurological studies focused on LLMs in treatment decision-making. A comprehensive search was conducted in the electronic databases OVID/Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through September 18th, 2024. Inclusion criteria included original studies published within the last five years focused on evaluating the efficacy of LLMs in treatment decision-making in neurology. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Y6N3E ). Four studies were identified. ChatGPT was the LLM utilized in each article, though varying in model versions. Each study demonstrated positive outcomes across varying metrics, with models generally aligning with clinician decisions. However, the lack of observed studies and variability of neurological topics limit the generalizability of these AI tools. This scoping review analyzes the existing body of evidence on LLMs in treatment decision-making in neurology. While current studies suggest potential to support clinical care, there is insufficient evidence at this stage to claim outcome improvement. Findings are not yet generalizable across neurological practice, as existing promise appears limited to narrow use cases. Prospective validation across subspecialties is needed to support broader clinical application.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.