{"title":"综合来源分配和风险评估是废弃锑冶炼厂重金属控制的重点。","authors":"Xiao-Hong Ma, Zhuan-Ling Shao, Yu-Han Wang, Wei-Di Tu, Li-Bang Ma, Jiao Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10653-025-02754-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mining and smelting constitute primary anthropogenic sources of persistent heavy metal (HM) contamination in soils, posing severe ecological and health threats globally. Conventional risk assessment often fails to discriminate between natural weathering inputs and anthropogenic emissions while struggling to prioritize pollution sources by risk severity, hindering targeted remediation. This study overcomes these limitations by integrating positive matrix factorization (PMF) source apportionment with ecological risk assessment (ERA) and health risk assessment (HRA) frameworks to quantify source-specific risks. Applied to soils surrounding an abandoned antimony smelter in Gansu Province, HM concentrations (excluding Cr and Ni) exceeded background levels, with Sb reaching 935.28 mg/kg. Extreme pollution by Sb and Cd was observed, while 95% of samples showed moderate to heavy contamination levels. PMF identified four primary pollution sources: industrial activities (27.82%), mining (30.43%), natural sources (21.11%), and transportation (20.64%). ERA indicated extreme ecological risks attributable primarily to Sb, Cd, and Hg, with substantial contributions from industrial (50.11%) and mining (31.83%) origins. HRA revealed unacceptable non-carcinogenic (24.90 for children, 4.06 for adults) and carcinogenic risks (1.83 × 10<sup>-4</sup> for children, 1.11 × 10<sup>-4</sup> for adults). Ingestion served as the predominant exposure pathway, primarily from Sb and As for non-carcinogenic risks and carcinogenic risks, respectively. Integrated risk apportionment demonstrated dominant non-carcinogenic risk contributions from mining (53.33%) and industrial (43.62%) activities primarily via Sb, while industrial (36.60%) and natural (35.81%) sources were major carcinogenic risk contributors with Ni and Cd as the key contaminant. This quantitative source-risk linkage provides a science-based foundation for prioritising control measures and enabling safe reclamation of polluted industrial sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 10","pages":"438"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated source apportionment and risk assessment prioritizes heavy metal control at an abandoned antimony smelter.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Hong Ma, Zhuan-Ling Shao, Yu-Han Wang, Wei-Di Tu, Li-Bang Ma, Jiao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10653-025-02754-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mining and smelting constitute primary anthropogenic sources of persistent heavy metal (HM) contamination in soils, posing severe ecological and health threats globally. Conventional risk assessment often fails to discriminate between natural weathering inputs and anthropogenic emissions while struggling to prioritize pollution sources by risk severity, hindering targeted remediation. This study overcomes these limitations by integrating positive matrix factorization (PMF) source apportionment with ecological risk assessment (ERA) and health risk assessment (HRA) frameworks to quantify source-specific risks. Applied to soils surrounding an abandoned antimony smelter in Gansu Province, HM concentrations (excluding Cr and Ni) exceeded background levels, with Sb reaching 935.28 mg/kg. Extreme pollution by Sb and Cd was observed, while 95% of samples showed moderate to heavy contamination levels. PMF identified four primary pollution sources: industrial activities (27.82%), mining (30.43%), natural sources (21.11%), and transportation (20.64%). ERA indicated extreme ecological risks attributable primarily to Sb, Cd, and Hg, with substantial contributions from industrial (50.11%) and mining (31.83%) origins. HRA revealed unacceptable non-carcinogenic (24.90 for children, 4.06 for adults) and carcinogenic risks (1.83 × 10<sup>-4</sup> for children, 1.11 × 10<sup>-4</sup> for adults). Ingestion served as the predominant exposure pathway, primarily from Sb and As for non-carcinogenic risks and carcinogenic risks, respectively. Integrated risk apportionment demonstrated dominant non-carcinogenic risk contributions from mining (53.33%) and industrial (43.62%) activities primarily via Sb, while industrial (36.60%) and natural (35.81%) sources were major carcinogenic risk contributors with Ni and Cd as the key contaminant. This quantitative source-risk linkage provides a science-based foundation for prioritising control measures and enabling safe reclamation of polluted industrial sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"volume\":\"47 10\",\"pages\":\"438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02754-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02754-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated source apportionment and risk assessment prioritizes heavy metal control at an abandoned antimony smelter.
Mining and smelting constitute primary anthropogenic sources of persistent heavy metal (HM) contamination in soils, posing severe ecological and health threats globally. Conventional risk assessment often fails to discriminate between natural weathering inputs and anthropogenic emissions while struggling to prioritize pollution sources by risk severity, hindering targeted remediation. This study overcomes these limitations by integrating positive matrix factorization (PMF) source apportionment with ecological risk assessment (ERA) and health risk assessment (HRA) frameworks to quantify source-specific risks. Applied to soils surrounding an abandoned antimony smelter in Gansu Province, HM concentrations (excluding Cr and Ni) exceeded background levels, with Sb reaching 935.28 mg/kg. Extreme pollution by Sb and Cd was observed, while 95% of samples showed moderate to heavy contamination levels. PMF identified four primary pollution sources: industrial activities (27.82%), mining (30.43%), natural sources (21.11%), and transportation (20.64%). ERA indicated extreme ecological risks attributable primarily to Sb, Cd, and Hg, with substantial contributions from industrial (50.11%) and mining (31.83%) origins. HRA revealed unacceptable non-carcinogenic (24.90 for children, 4.06 for adults) and carcinogenic risks (1.83 × 10-4 for children, 1.11 × 10-4 for adults). Ingestion served as the predominant exposure pathway, primarily from Sb and As for non-carcinogenic risks and carcinogenic risks, respectively. Integrated risk apportionment demonstrated dominant non-carcinogenic risk contributions from mining (53.33%) and industrial (43.62%) activities primarily via Sb, while industrial (36.60%) and natural (35.81%) sources were major carcinogenic risk contributors with Ni and Cd as the key contaminant. This quantitative source-risk linkage provides a science-based foundation for prioritising control measures and enabling safe reclamation of polluted industrial sites.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people.
Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes.
The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.