内镜下粘膜下夹层对结直肠病变的水下夹子闭合与常规夹子闭合:首次比较研究。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestion Pub Date : 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1159/000548463
Hirotaka Oura, Daisuke Murakami, Harutoshi Sugiyama, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai
{"title":"内镜下粘膜下夹层对结直肠病变的水下夹子闭合与常规夹子闭合:首次比较研究。","authors":"Hirotaka Oura, Daisuke Murakami, Harutoshi Sugiyama, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai","doi":"10.1159/000548463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction This single-center retrospective study compared underwater clip closure (UCC) with conventional clip closure (CCC) under routine gas insufflation for post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcers of colorectal lesions measuring ≤5 cm. Methods Between May 2021 and June 2023, 89 patients were enrolled. Since March 2022, all cases underwent UCC. Patients were divided into the UCC group (n = 52) and the CCC group (n = 37). Primary outcomes were complete closure rate and incidence of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS), delayed bleeding, and perforation. Secondary outcomes included closure time and number of clips used. Results Complete closure was achieved in all cases, with no PECS, delayed bleeding, or perforation in either group. Median closure time was significantly shorter in the UCC group (10 min [IQR, 7-14]) than in the CCC group (11 min [IQR, 8.5-19]; p = 0.044). The number of clips used was similar (median 10 in both groups; p = 0.290). Multiple regression analysis identified both resection area (p < 0.001) and closure method (p = 0.002) as independent factors affecting closure time. Conclusion UCC may decrease the time required for post-ESD closure of colorectal lesions measuring ≤5 cm, while using a comparable number of clips to CCC, with no serious complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underwater Clip Closure versus Conventional Clip Closure following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Lesions: A First Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hirotaka Oura, Daisuke Murakami, Harutoshi Sugiyama, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction This single-center retrospective study compared underwater clip closure (UCC) with conventional clip closure (CCC) under routine gas insufflation for post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcers of colorectal lesions measuring ≤5 cm. Methods Between May 2021 and June 2023, 89 patients were enrolled. Since March 2022, all cases underwent UCC. Patients were divided into the UCC group (n = 52) and the CCC group (n = 37). Primary outcomes were complete closure rate and incidence of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS), delayed bleeding, and perforation. Secondary outcomes included closure time and number of clips used. Results Complete closure was achieved in all cases, with no PECS, delayed bleeding, or perforation in either group. Median closure time was significantly shorter in the UCC group (10 min [IQR, 7-14]) than in the CCC group (11 min [IQR, 8.5-19]; p = 0.044). The number of clips used was similar (median 10 in both groups; p = 0.290). Multiple regression analysis identified both resection area (p < 0.001) and closure method (p = 0.002) as independent factors affecting closure time. Conclusion UCC may decrease the time required for post-ESD closure of colorectal lesions measuring ≤5 cm, while using a comparable number of clips to CCC, with no serious complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548463\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是一项单中心回顾性研究,比较了内镜下粘膜下夹层(ESD)溃疡≤5 cm的结直肠病变,在常规充气条件下水下夹封术(UCC)与常规夹封术(CCC)的疗效。方法2021年5月至2023年6月,89例患者入组。自2022年3月起,所有病例均行UCC。患者分为UCC组(n = 52)和CCC组(n = 37)。主要结局是完全闭合率和esd后凝血综合征(PECS)发生率、延迟出血和穿孔。次要结果包括闭合时间和使用夹的数量。结果所有病例均获得完全闭合,两组均无PECS、延迟出血或穿孔。UCC组的中位闭合时间(10 min [IQR, 7-14])明显短于CCC组(11 min [IQR, 8.5-19]; p = 0.044)。使用的夹子数量相似(两组中位数为10个;p = 0.290)。多元回归分析发现,切除面积(p < 0.001)和闭合方法(p = 0.002)是影响闭合时间的独立因素。结论UCC可缩短esd对≤5cm结直肠病变的闭合时间,且使用的夹数与CCC相当,无严重并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Underwater Clip Closure versus Conventional Clip Closure following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Lesions: A First Comparative Study.

Introduction This single-center retrospective study compared underwater clip closure (UCC) with conventional clip closure (CCC) under routine gas insufflation for post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ulcers of colorectal lesions measuring ≤5 cm. Methods Between May 2021 and June 2023, 89 patients were enrolled. Since March 2022, all cases underwent UCC. Patients were divided into the UCC group (n = 52) and the CCC group (n = 37). Primary outcomes were complete closure rate and incidence of post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS), delayed bleeding, and perforation. Secondary outcomes included closure time and number of clips used. Results Complete closure was achieved in all cases, with no PECS, delayed bleeding, or perforation in either group. Median closure time was significantly shorter in the UCC group (10 min [IQR, 7-14]) than in the CCC group (11 min [IQR, 8.5-19]; p = 0.044). The number of clips used was similar (median 10 in both groups; p = 0.290). Multiple regression analysis identified both resection area (p < 0.001) and closure method (p = 0.002) as independent factors affecting closure time. Conclusion UCC may decrease the time required for post-ESD closure of colorectal lesions measuring ≤5 cm, while using a comparable number of clips to CCC, with no serious complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestion
Digestion 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信