两秒钟说话:提高基于功能磁共振成像的脑机接口的通信速度。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain connectivity Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1177/21580014251376731
Daniëlle Evenblij, Michael Lührs, Reebal W Rafeh, Amaia Benitez Andonegui, Deni Kurban, Giancarlo Valente, Bettina Sorger
{"title":"两秒钟说话:提高基于功能磁共振成像的脑机接口的通信速度。","authors":"Daniëlle Evenblij, Michael Lührs, Reebal W Rafeh, Amaia Benitez Andonegui, Deni Kurban, Giancarlo Valente, Bettina Sorger","doi":"10.1177/21580014251376731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide alternative, motor-independent means of communication for people who have lost motor function. A promising variant is the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based BCI, which exploits information on hemodynamic brain activity evoked by performing different mental tasks. However, due to the sluggish nature of the hemodynamic response, a current challenge is to make these BCIs as efficient and fast as possible to allow useful clinical application. Furthermore, there is yet no consensus on optimal mental-task selection for multi-voxel pattern analysis-based decoding, nor whether certain tasks generalize well across users, or if individualized task selection would yield a higher decoding accuracy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To increase BCI efficiency, we tested whether distributed patterns of 3T-fMRI brain activation evoked by two-second mental tasks could be reliably discriminated in 2- to 7-class classification. In addition, we identified optimal mental-task combinations for high-accuracy classification across all classes. Finally, we examined whether individualized task selection-based on subjects' previous decoding performance (<i>accuracy-based</i> tasks) or their subjective preference (<i>preference-based tasks</i>)-was superior to the other in a yes/no communication paradigm. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The 2-class decoding resulted in a mean accuracy of 78% and 3- to 7-class accuracies were above chance level. Mental calculation and spatial navigation were most frequently associated with the highest decoding accuracy. Furthermore, subjects could encode yes/no answers using their <i>accuracy-based</i> and <i>preference-based</i> tasks with mean accuracies of 83% and 81%, respectively. This implies that this paradigm, using short encoding durations, is well-suited to the diversity of patients and could greatly increase BCI efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9155,"journal":{"name":"Brain connectivity","volume":" ","pages":"283-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Seconds to Speak: Increasing Communication Speed for fMRI-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Daniëlle Evenblij, Michael Lührs, Reebal W Rafeh, Amaia Benitez Andonegui, Deni Kurban, Giancarlo Valente, Bettina Sorger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21580014251376731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide alternative, motor-independent means of communication for people who have lost motor function. A promising variant is the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based BCI, which exploits information on hemodynamic brain activity evoked by performing different mental tasks. However, due to the sluggish nature of the hemodynamic response, a current challenge is to make these BCIs as efficient and fast as possible to allow useful clinical application. Furthermore, there is yet no consensus on optimal mental-task selection for multi-voxel pattern analysis-based decoding, nor whether certain tasks generalize well across users, or if individualized task selection would yield a higher decoding accuracy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To increase BCI efficiency, we tested whether distributed patterns of 3T-fMRI brain activation evoked by two-second mental tasks could be reliably discriminated in 2- to 7-class classification. In addition, we identified optimal mental-task combinations for high-accuracy classification across all classes. Finally, we examined whether individualized task selection-based on subjects' previous decoding performance (<i>accuracy-based</i> tasks) or their subjective preference (<i>preference-based tasks</i>)-was superior to the other in a yes/no communication paradigm. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The 2-class decoding resulted in a mean accuracy of 78% and 3- to 7-class accuracies were above chance level. Mental calculation and spatial navigation were most frequently associated with the highest decoding accuracy. Furthermore, subjects could encode yes/no answers using their <i>accuracy-based</i> and <i>preference-based</i> tasks with mean accuracies of 83% and 81%, respectively. This implies that this paradigm, using short encoding durations, is well-suited to the diversity of patients and could greatly increase BCI efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"283-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain connectivity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21580014251376731\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain connectivity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21580014251376731","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑机接口(bci)可以为失去运动功能的人提供另一种独立于运动的交流方式。一种很有前景的变体是基于功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)的脑机接口(BCI),它利用执行不同脑力任务时引起的大脑血流动力学活动的信息。然而,由于血流动力学反应的缓慢性质,目前的挑战是使这些脑机接口尽可能高效和快速,以允许有用的临床应用。此外,对于基于多体素模式分析的解码的最佳心理任务选择,以及某些任务是否在用户中很好地泛化,或者个性化任务选择是否会产生更高的解码精度,目前还没有达成共识。方法:为了提高脑机接口效率,我们测试了2秒心理任务诱发的3T-fMRI脑激活的分布模式是否可以可靠地区分为2- 7类分类。此外,我们确定了所有类别中高精度分类的最佳心理任务组合。最后,我们研究了在是/否沟通范式中,基于受试者先前解码表现(基于准确性的任务)或他们的主观偏好(基于偏好的任务)的个性化任务选择是否优于其他任务。结果:2级解码的平均准确率为78%,3 ~ 7级解码的准确率高于随机水平。心算和空间导航通常与最高的解码准确率相关。此外,受试者可以使用基于准确性和基于偏好的任务编码是/否答案,平均准确率分别为83%和81%。这意味着这种使用短编码持续时间的范式非常适合患者的多样性,并且可以大大提高脑机接口的效率。本研究表明,两秒钟心理任务诱发的大脑激活可以通过多体素模式分析可靠地解码,显著提高了功能磁共振成像(fMRI)-脑机接口(bci)的效率,同时仍能达到较高的准确性,从而推进了基于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的脑机接口(bci)。通过探索七种不同心理任务的可分化性,采用多达七种的二元分类和多类分类,以及个性化的任务选择,我们为优化患者定制的fmri - bci心理任务范式提供了见解。鉴于运动障碍患者认知能力的可变性,为患者量身定制的脑机接口(bci)具有各种各样的心理任务,受到高度欢迎。这些发现有助于更快、更直观、认知要求更低的血流动力学脑机接口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Seconds to Speak: Increasing Communication Speed for fMRI-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.

Background: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can provide alternative, motor-independent means of communication for people who have lost motor function. A promising variant is the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based BCI, which exploits information on hemodynamic brain activity evoked by performing different mental tasks. However, due to the sluggish nature of the hemodynamic response, a current challenge is to make these BCIs as efficient and fast as possible to allow useful clinical application. Furthermore, there is yet no consensus on optimal mental-task selection for multi-voxel pattern analysis-based decoding, nor whether certain tasks generalize well across users, or if individualized task selection would yield a higher decoding accuracy. Methods: To increase BCI efficiency, we tested whether distributed patterns of 3T-fMRI brain activation evoked by two-second mental tasks could be reliably discriminated in 2- to 7-class classification. In addition, we identified optimal mental-task combinations for high-accuracy classification across all classes. Finally, we examined whether individualized task selection-based on subjects' previous decoding performance (accuracy-based tasks) or their subjective preference (preference-based tasks)-was superior to the other in a yes/no communication paradigm. Results: The 2-class decoding resulted in a mean accuracy of 78% and 3- to 7-class accuracies were above chance level. Mental calculation and spatial navigation were most frequently associated with the highest decoding accuracy. Furthermore, subjects could encode yes/no answers using their accuracy-based and preference-based tasks with mean accuracies of 83% and 81%, respectively. This implies that this paradigm, using short encoding durations, is well-suited to the diversity of patients and could greatly increase BCI efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain connectivity
Brain connectivity Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Brain Connectivity provides groundbreaking findings in the rapidly advancing field of connectivity research at the systems and network levels. The Journal disseminates information on brain mapping, modeling, novel research techniques, new imaging modalities, preclinical animal studies, and the translation of research discoveries from the laboratory to the clinic. This essential journal fosters the application of basic biological discoveries and contributes to the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic interventions to recognize and treat a broad range of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders such as: Alzheimer’s disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, stroke, dementia, and depression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信