欧洲处方考试的可行性和质量:一项来自16所医学院的3109名医学生的国际多中心试点研究

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Erik M Donker, Joost D Piët, David J Brinkman, Milan C Richir, Paraskevi Papaioannidou, Robert Likic, Emilio J Sanz, Thierry Christiaens, João N Costa, Fabrizio De Ponti, Ylva Böttiger, Cornelis Kramers, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar
{"title":"欧洲处方考试的可行性和质量:一项来自16所医学院的3109名医学生的国际多中心试点研究","authors":"Erik M Donker, Joost D Piët, David J Brinkman, Milan C Richir, Paraskevi Papaioannidou, Robert Likic, Emilio J Sanz, Thierry Christiaens, João N Costa, Fabrizio De Ponti, Ylva Böttiger, Cornelis Kramers, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar","doi":"10.1002/cpt.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge \"Medication Without Harm\" emphasizes the need to improve doctors' prescribing competence. Junior doctors are particularly at risk of prescribing errors due to inadequate training. To address this, the European Prescribing Exam was developed to standardize and improve clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) education across Europe. This study describes the development and quality analysis of the first two pilot examinations. Based on European consensus studies and the Dutch National Pharmacotherapy Assessment, an assessment blueprint was developed. Two pilot examinations, each with 36 knowledge-based and 11 skills-based questions, were administered between 2020 and 2023 at 16 medical schools in 11 countries. We assessed exam quality through reliability (standard error of measurement, Cronbach's alpha, item-rest correlations (R<sub>ir</sub>-value), difficulty index (DI)), and content validity (content validity ratio's (CVR)). Questions with a negative R<sub>ir</sub> or CVR, or DI < 0.44 were flagged as potential lower quality. In addition, students' scores (% of maximum) and differences between schools and curricula were evaluated. A total of 3109 students participated (Examination 1: 1371; Examination 2: 1745). Most questions were of high quality; 20/94 (21.3%) were flagged. Median scores on the examinations were 66.2% (IQR 55.4-74.3) and 58.9% (IQR 52.1-65.8) for pilot 1 and 2, respectively. Students from schools with problem-based learning or a national prescribing examination scored significantly higher (P < 0.001). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of a standardized European Prescribing Exam. However, the wide variation and generally low median scores highlight the need to improve and harmonize CPT education across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Feasibility and Quality of the European Prescribing Exam: An International Multicenter Pilot Study Among 3109 Medical Students From 16 Medical Schools.\",\"authors\":\"Erik M Donker, Joost D Piët, David J Brinkman, Milan C Richir, Paraskevi Papaioannidou, Robert Likic, Emilio J Sanz, Thierry Christiaens, João N Costa, Fabrizio De Ponti, Ylva Böttiger, Cornelis Kramers, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpt.70063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge \\\"Medication Without Harm\\\" emphasizes the need to improve doctors' prescribing competence. Junior doctors are particularly at risk of prescribing errors due to inadequate training. To address this, the European Prescribing Exam was developed to standardize and improve clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) education across Europe. This study describes the development and quality analysis of the first two pilot examinations. Based on European consensus studies and the Dutch National Pharmacotherapy Assessment, an assessment blueprint was developed. Two pilot examinations, each with 36 knowledge-based and 11 skills-based questions, were administered between 2020 and 2023 at 16 medical schools in 11 countries. We assessed exam quality through reliability (standard error of measurement, Cronbach's alpha, item-rest correlations (R<sub>ir</sub>-value), difficulty index (DI)), and content validity (content validity ratio's (CVR)). Questions with a negative R<sub>ir</sub> or CVR, or DI < 0.44 were flagged as potential lower quality. In addition, students' scores (% of maximum) and differences between schools and curricula were evaluated. A total of 3109 students participated (Examination 1: 1371; Examination 2: 1745). Most questions were of high quality; 20/94 (21.3%) were flagged. Median scores on the examinations were 66.2% (IQR 55.4-74.3) and 58.9% (IQR 52.1-65.8) for pilot 1 and 2, respectively. Students from schools with problem-based learning or a national prescribing examination scored significantly higher (P < 0.001). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of a standardized European Prescribing Exam. However, the wide variation and generally low median scores highlight the need to improve and harmonize CPT education across Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70063\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70063","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世卫组织“无伤害用药”全球患者安全挑战强调需要提高医生的处方能力。由于培训不足,初级医生尤其容易出现处方错误。为了解决这个问题,欧洲处方考试的发展是为了规范和改善整个欧洲的临床药理学和治疗学(CPT)教育。本研究描述了前两次试点考试的发展和质量分析。基于欧洲共识研究和荷兰国家药物治疗评估,制定了评估蓝图。2020年至2023年期间,在11个国家的16所医学院进行了两次试点考试,每个考试都有36个知识问题和11个技能问题。我们通过信度(测量标准误差、Cronbach’s alpha、项目-rest相关性(Rir-value)、难度指数(DI)和内容效度(内容效度比(CVR))来评估考试质量。带有否定Rir或CVR或DI的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Feasibility and Quality of the European Prescribing Exam: An International Multicenter Pilot Study Among 3109 Medical Students From 16 Medical Schools.

The WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge "Medication Without Harm" emphasizes the need to improve doctors' prescribing competence. Junior doctors are particularly at risk of prescribing errors due to inadequate training. To address this, the European Prescribing Exam was developed to standardize and improve clinical pharmacology and therapeutics (CPT) education across Europe. This study describes the development and quality analysis of the first two pilot examinations. Based on European consensus studies and the Dutch National Pharmacotherapy Assessment, an assessment blueprint was developed. Two pilot examinations, each with 36 knowledge-based and 11 skills-based questions, were administered between 2020 and 2023 at 16 medical schools in 11 countries. We assessed exam quality through reliability (standard error of measurement, Cronbach's alpha, item-rest correlations (Rir-value), difficulty index (DI)), and content validity (content validity ratio's (CVR)). Questions with a negative Rir or CVR, or DI < 0.44 were flagged as potential lower quality. In addition, students' scores (% of maximum) and differences between schools and curricula were evaluated. A total of 3109 students participated (Examination 1: 1371; Examination 2: 1745). Most questions were of high quality; 20/94 (21.3%) were flagged. Median scores on the examinations were 66.2% (IQR 55.4-74.3) and 58.9% (IQR 52.1-65.8) for pilot 1 and 2, respectively. Students from schools with problem-based learning or a national prescribing examination scored significantly higher (P < 0.001). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of a standardized European Prescribing Exam. However, the wide variation and generally low median scores highlight the need to improve and harmonize CPT education across Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信