格拉斯哥结局评分结合中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后中的应用。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Ai Wei B.M. , Qiumeng Peng B.M. , Xiaoya Zheng B.M. , Yuanjing Li B.M.
{"title":"格拉斯哥结局评分结合中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血预后中的应用。","authors":"Ai Wei B.M. ,&nbsp;Qiumeng Peng B.M. ,&nbsp;Xiaoya Zheng B.M. ,&nbsp;Yuanjing Li B.M.","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the independent associations of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) prognosis, and evaluate their prognostic value both individually and in combination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 236 aSAH patients admitted within 24 hours of onset. Baseline clinical data included demographics, risk factors, neuroradiological features, treatments, complications, laboratory parameters, and onset-to-sampling interval. Prognosis was assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 6 months after discharge, with mRS &gt;2 defining poor outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified independent predictors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated predictive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 236 patients, 81 (34.3%) had the poor outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed the GOS score [odds ratio (<em>OR</em>)=0.659, 95% confidence interval (<em>CI</em>): 0.145-0.953], NLR (<em>OR</em>=1.218, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.069-1.796), and delayed cerebral ischemia (<em>OR</em>=2.114, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.183-3.952) as independent predictors. ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC for predicting aSAH outcome were 0.669 [the GOS score alone, standard error (<em>SE</em>): 0.036, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001], 0.697 (NLR alone, <em>SE</em>: 0.038, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001), and 0.831 (combined model, <em>SE</em>: 0.029, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). <em>Z</em>-test comparisons demonstrated that the AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than those of individual predictors (0.831 vs 0.669, <em>Z</em>=3.504, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001; 0.831 vs 0.697, <em>Z</em>=2.803, <em>P</em>&lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the GOS score and NLR were independently associated with the prognosis of aSAH patients and could be applied in prognosis assessment. Their combination enhanced predictive value, offering a tool for risk stratification and prognosis assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 11","pages":"Article 108451"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Glasgow Outcome Scale score combined with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting prognosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Ai Wei B.M. ,&nbsp;Qiumeng Peng B.M. ,&nbsp;Xiaoya Zheng B.M. ,&nbsp;Yuanjing Li B.M.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the independent associations of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) prognosis, and evaluate their prognostic value both individually and in combination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 236 aSAH patients admitted within 24 hours of onset. Baseline clinical data included demographics, risk factors, neuroradiological features, treatments, complications, laboratory parameters, and onset-to-sampling interval. Prognosis was assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 6 months after discharge, with mRS &gt;2 defining poor outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified independent predictors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated predictive performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 236 patients, 81 (34.3%) had the poor outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed the GOS score [odds ratio (<em>OR</em>)=0.659, 95% confidence interval (<em>CI</em>): 0.145-0.953], NLR (<em>OR</em>=1.218, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.069-1.796), and delayed cerebral ischemia (<em>OR</em>=2.114, 95% <em>CI</em>: 1.183-3.952) as independent predictors. ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC for predicting aSAH outcome were 0.669 [the GOS score alone, standard error (<em>SE</em>): 0.036, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001], 0.697 (NLR alone, <em>SE</em>: 0.038, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001), and 0.831 (combined model, <em>SE</em>: 0.029, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). <em>Z</em>-test comparisons demonstrated that the AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than those of individual predictors (0.831 vs 0.669, <em>Z</em>=3.504, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001; 0.831 vs 0.697, <em>Z</em>=2.803, <em>P</em>&lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the GOS score and NLR were independently associated with the prognosis of aSAH patients and could be applied in prognosis assessment. Their combination enhanced predictive value, offering a tool for risk stratification and prognosis assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\"34 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 108451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725002289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725002289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分及中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)预后的独立相关性,并评价其单独及联合应用的预后价值。方法:我们对发病24小时内入院的236例aSAH患者进行回顾性分析。基线临床数据包括人口统计学、危险因素、神经放射学特征、治疗、并发症、实验室参数和发病至采样间隔。出院后6个月采用改良兰金量表(mRS)评分进行预后评估,mRS bbbb2为不良预后。单变量和多变量分析确定了独立的预测因子,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估了预测效果。结果:236例患者中,81例(34.3%)预后不良。多因素分析显示GOS评分[比值比(OR)=0.659, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.145 ~ 0.953]、NLR (OR=1.218, 95% CI: 1.069 ~ 1.796)和延迟性脑缺血(OR=2.114, 95% CI: 1.183 ~ 3.952)为独立预测因子。ROC分析显示,预测aSAH预后的AUC为0.669[单独GOS评分,标准误差(SE): 0.036, p]。结论:GOS评分和NLR均与aSAH患者预后独立相关,可用于预后评估。两者的结合提高了预测价值,为风险分层和预后评估提供了工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Glasgow Outcome Scale score combined with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting prognosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Objective

To determine the independent associations of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) prognosis, and evaluate their prognostic value both individually and in combination.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 236 aSAH patients admitted within 24 hours of onset. Baseline clinical data included demographics, risk factors, neuroradiological features, treatments, complications, laboratory parameters, and onset-to-sampling interval. Prognosis was assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 6 months after discharge, with mRS >2 defining poor outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified independent predictors, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated predictive performance.

Results

Among 236 patients, 81 (34.3%) had the poor outcome. Multivariate analysis revealed the GOS score [odds ratio (OR)=0.659, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.145-0.953], NLR (OR=1.218, 95% CI: 1.069-1.796), and delayed cerebral ischemia (OR=2.114, 95% CI: 1.183-3.952) as independent predictors. ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC for predicting aSAH outcome were 0.669 [the GOS score alone, standard error (SE): 0.036, P<0.001], 0.697 (NLR alone, SE: 0.038, P<0.001), and 0.831 (combined model, SE: 0.029, P<0.001). Z-test comparisons demonstrated that the AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than those of individual predictors (0.831 vs 0.669, Z=3.504, P<0.001; 0.831 vs 0.697, Z=2.803, P<0.01).

Conclusion

Both the GOS score and NLR were independently associated with the prognosis of aSAH patients and could be applied in prognosis assessment. Their combination enhanced predictive value, offering a tool for risk stratification and prognosis assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信