机器人辅助全膝关节置换术提高功能对齐恢复的准确性:一项准随机对照试验。

IF 0.5
Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Jens Schneider, Andrea Maria Nobili, Daniel Kämmer, Andreas Bell
{"title":"机器人辅助全膝关节置换术提高功能对齐恢复的准确性:一项准随机对照试验。","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Jens Schneider, Andrea Maria Nobili, Daniel Kämmer, Andreas Bell","doi":"10.1007/s00132-025-04711-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This quasi-randomized controlled trial compared robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring patient-specific coronal alignment according to a functional alignment philosophy. Outcomes included preservation of the anatomical hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), and component positioning. Subgroup analyses assessed consistency in valgus and varus morphotypes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-blind parallel group quasi-RCT was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Germany (2021-2025). Patients underwent TKA following identical perioperative pathways. All procedures used a medial parapatellar approach and Smith & Nephew Legion Genesis II implants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 692 patients were enrolled (346 robotic, 346 freehand). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Postoperative HKA was similar between groups, but the robotic group achieved a significantly smaller aHKA delta (2.58° vs 4.49°, p = 0.002). Robotic-assisted TKA preserved joint line alignment more consistently in valgus (2.63° vs 5.72°, p = 0.03) and varus knees (2.56° vs 4.22°, p = 0.004). The MAD control was improved, while differences n the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted TKA enhanced accuracy in reproducing native joint line orientation, offering more consistent preservation of joint line obliquity in both valgus and varus morphotypes, thus supporting its role in personalized alignment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved accuracy of functional alignment restoration with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Migliorini, Luise Schäfer, Jens Schneider, Andrea Maria Nobili, Daniel Kämmer, Andreas Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00132-025-04711-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This quasi-randomized controlled trial compared robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring patient-specific coronal alignment according to a functional alignment philosophy. Outcomes included preservation of the anatomical hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), and component positioning. Subgroup analyses assessed consistency in valgus and varus morphotypes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-blind parallel group quasi-RCT was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Germany (2021-2025). Patients underwent TKA following identical perioperative pathways. All procedures used a medial parapatellar approach and Smith & Nephew Legion Genesis II implants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 692 patients were enrolled (346 robotic, 346 freehand). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Postoperative HKA was similar between groups, but the robotic group achieved a significantly smaller aHKA delta (2.58° vs 4.49°, p = 0.002). Robotic-assisted TKA preserved joint line alignment more consistently in valgus (2.63° vs 5.72°, p = 0.03) and varus knees (2.56° vs 4.22°, p = 0.004). The MAD control was improved, while differences n the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted TKA enhanced accuracy in reproducing native joint line orientation, offering more consistent preservation of joint line obliquity in both valgus and varus morphotypes, thus supporting its role in personalized alignment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04711-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-025-04711-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:这项准随机对照试验比较了机器人辅助和传统全膝关节置换术(TKA)在恢复患者特异性冠状位对齐方面的功能。结果包括保留髋关节-膝关节-踝关节解剖角度(aHKA)、机械轴偏差(MAD)和部件定位。亚组分析评估外翻和内翻形态的一致性。材料与方法:在德国Eifelklinik St. Brigida骨科进行单盲平行组准随机对照试验(2021-2025)。患者在相同的围手术期路径下接受TKA。所有手术均采用内侧髌旁入路和Smith & Nephew Legion Genesis II植入物。结果:共纳入692例患者(346例机器人,346例徒手)。基线特征具有可比性。两组术后HKA相似,但机器人组的aHKA δ明显较小(2.58°vs 4.49°,p = 0.002)。机器人辅助TKA在外翻(2.63°vs 5.72°,p = 0.03)和膝内翻(2.56°vs 4.22°,p = 0.004)中更一致地保持关节线对齐。MAD控制得到改善,而机械股骨外侧远端角(mLDFA)和机械胫骨内侧近端角(mMPTA)的差异无统计学意义。结论:机器人辅助TKA提高了再现关节线方向的准确性,在外翻和内翻形态下都提供了更一致的关节线倾角保存,从而支持其在个性化对齐策略中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved accuracy of functional alignment restoration with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.

Background and objectives: This quasi-randomized controlled trial compared robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in restoring patient-specific coronal alignment according to a functional alignment philosophy. Outcomes included preservation of the anatomical hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), mechanical axis deviation (MAD), and component positioning. Subgroup analyses assessed consistency in valgus and varus morphotypes.

Material and methods: A single-blind parallel group quasi-RCT was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Germany (2021-2025). Patients underwent TKA following identical perioperative pathways. All procedures used a medial parapatellar approach and Smith & Nephew Legion Genesis II implants.

Results: A total of 692 patients were enrolled (346 robotic, 346 freehand). Baseline characteristics were comparable. Postoperative HKA was similar between groups, but the robotic group achieved a significantly smaller aHKA delta (2.58° vs 4.49°, p = 0.002). Robotic-assisted TKA preserved joint line alignment more consistently in valgus (2.63° vs 5.72°, p = 0.03) and varus knees (2.56° vs 4.22°, p = 0.004). The MAD control was improved, while differences n the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were not significant.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted TKA enhanced accuracy in reproducing native joint line orientation, offering more consistent preservation of joint line obliquity in both valgus and varus morphotypes, thus supporting its role in personalized alignment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信