Julie M Clarke, Trevor J Lockett, Karen L Harrap, Brooke E Flanders, Virginia Bird, Alex Boussioutas, Mark Appleyard, David Williams, Sophie Zaloumis, Arun Gupta, Suresh Sivanesan, Aysha Al-Ani, Ralley Prentice, Allan D Spigelman, Digsu N Koye, Patrick M Lynch, Finlay A Macrae
{"title":"丁基化淀粉对家族性腺瘤性息肉患者肠息肉的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验的结果。","authors":"Julie M Clarke, Trevor J Lockett, Karen L Harrap, Brooke E Flanders, Virginia Bird, Alex Boussioutas, Mark Appleyard, David Williams, Sophie Zaloumis, Arun Gupta, Suresh Sivanesan, Aysha Al-Ani, Ralley Prentice, Allan D Spigelman, Digsu N Koye, Patrick M Lynch, Finlay A Macrae","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Butyrate may reduce risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three-6-month periods participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent 4 video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope; tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared to placebo periods. 72 participants were randomized (33 female) with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis HAMSB did not reduce mean global (0.9-fold change, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218) or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88-fold change, 95% CI: 0.71-1.1, P = 0.267). There was a trend for reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.03, P=0.074). In the per-protocol analysis there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79-fold change, 0.62-1, P=0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, the 95% CI indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of butyrylated starch on bowel polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julie M Clarke, Trevor J Lockett, Karen L Harrap, Brooke E Flanders, Virginia Bird, Alex Boussioutas, Mark Appleyard, David Williams, Sophie Zaloumis, Arun Gupta, Suresh Sivanesan, Aysha Al-Ani, Ralley Prentice, Allan D Spigelman, Digsu N Koye, Patrick M Lynch, Finlay A Macrae\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Butyrate may reduce risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three-6-month periods participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent 4 video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope; tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared to placebo periods. 72 participants were randomized (33 female) with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis HAMSB did not reduce mean global (0.9-fold change, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218) or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88-fold change, 95% CI: 0.71-1.1, P = 0.267). There was a trend for reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.03, P=0.074). In the per-protocol analysis there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79-fold change, 0.62-1, P=0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, the 95% CI indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of butyrylated starch on bowel polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Butyrate may reduce risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three-6-month periods participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent 4 video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope; tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared to placebo periods. 72 participants were randomized (33 female) with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis HAMSB did not reduce mean global (0.9-fold change, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218) or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88-fold change, 95% CI: 0.71-1.1, P = 0.267). There was a trend for reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.03, P=0.074). In the per-protocol analysis there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79-fold change, 0.62-1, P=0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, the 95% CI indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.