丁基化淀粉对家族性腺瘤性息肉患者肠息肉的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验的结果。

IF 2.6
Julie M Clarke, Trevor J Lockett, Karen L Harrap, Brooke E Flanders, Virginia Bird, Alex Boussioutas, Mark Appleyard, David Williams, Sophie Zaloumis, Arun Gupta, Suresh Sivanesan, Aysha Al-Ani, Ralley Prentice, Allan D Spigelman, Digsu N Koye, Patrick M Lynch, Finlay A Macrae
{"title":"丁基化淀粉对家族性腺瘤性息肉患者肠息肉的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照交叉试验的结果。","authors":"Julie M Clarke, Trevor J Lockett, Karen L Harrap, Brooke E Flanders, Virginia Bird, Alex Boussioutas, Mark Appleyard, David Williams, Sophie Zaloumis, Arun Gupta, Suresh Sivanesan, Aysha Al-Ani, Ralley Prentice, Allan D Spigelman, Digsu N Koye, Patrick M Lynch, Finlay A Macrae","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Butyrate may reduce risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three-6-month periods participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent 4 video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope; tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared to placebo periods. 72 participants were randomized (33 female) with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis HAMSB did not reduce mean global (0.9-fold change, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218) or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88-fold change, 95% CI: 0.71-1.1, P = 0.267). There was a trend for reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.03, P=0.074). In the per-protocol analysis there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79-fold change, 0.62-1, P=0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, the 95% CI indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of butyrylated starch on bowel polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julie M Clarke, Trevor J Lockett, Karen L Harrap, Brooke E Flanders, Virginia Bird, Alex Boussioutas, Mark Appleyard, David Williams, Sophie Zaloumis, Arun Gupta, Suresh Sivanesan, Aysha Al-Ani, Ralley Prentice, Allan D Spigelman, Digsu N Koye, Patrick M Lynch, Finlay A Macrae\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Butyrate may reduce risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three-6-month periods participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent 4 video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope; tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared to placebo periods. 72 participants were randomized (33 female) with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis HAMSB did not reduce mean global (0.9-fold change, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218) or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88-fold change, 95% CI: 0.71-1.1, P = 0.267). There was a trend for reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.03, P=0.074). In the per-protocol analysis there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79-fold change, 0.62-1, P=0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, the 95% CI indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

丁酸盐可以降低结直肠癌的风险,并且可以通过丁酸淀粉(HAMSB)输送到结肠。本试验评估了HAMSB对家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者息肉负荷的影响。该研究是一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉试验。在3 -6个月的时间里,参与者每天摄入40克HAMSB或低直链淀粉,然后是另一种,然后是洗脱期。参与者接受了4次视频结肠镜检查,以评估息肉负荷为主要终点。在基线处放置两个远端肠纹身:纹身一个在每个范围内清除息肉;两个纹身是息肉留在原位的地方。使用广义线性混合模型来估计干预期间与安慰剂期间平均息肉计数的比率。72名参与者被随机分配(33名女性),其中49人完成了研究。在意向治疗分析中,HAMSB没有降低总体平均值(0.9倍变化,95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218)或较小(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of butyrylated starch on bowel polyps in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Butyrate may reduce risk of colorectal cancer and can be delivered to the colon using butyrylated starch (HAMSB). This trial evaluated effects of HAMSB on polyp burden in participants with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. In three-6-month periods participants ingested 40 g/day of HAMSB or low amylose starch, followed by the alternative, and then a washout. Participants underwent 4 video-recorded colonoscopies to assess polyp burden as the primary endpoint. At baseline two distal bowel tattoos were placed: tattoo one where polyps were cleared at each scope; tattoo two where polyps were left in situ. Generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate the ratio of mean polyp counts in intervention compared to placebo periods. 72 participants were randomized (33 female) with 49 completing the study. In the intention-to-treat analysis HAMSB did not reduce mean global (0.9-fold change, 95% CI: 0.77-1.06, P=0.218) or small (<2.4 mm) polyp numbers (0.88-fold change, 95% CI: 0.71-1.1, P = 0.267). There was a trend for reduction of small polyps in tattoo one (0.72-fold change, 95% CI: 0.5-1.03, P=0.074). In the per-protocol analysis there was a strong trend for HAMSB to reduce mean global small polyp numbers (0.79-fold change, 0.62-1, P=0.051). HAMSB may reduce polyp initiation in the distal bowel without causing regression or growth of existing polyps. However, the 95% CI indicate large uncertainty to the true direction of the treatment effect and the P values provide only weak evidence against the null hypothesis of no treatment effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信