危象下的腹股沟疝修补术:中国新冠肺炎时代手术结果的回顾性队列研究

Dhierin Roman Jagdewsing, Wally Elijah, Ahmed A Mohammedzeyn, Omane V Kwakye, Yachin Singh, N M Motachim Mahmud, R A Geehari Mihinsa De Alwis, Masoumeh Rashidi, Hania Moharam, Fariya Iqbal
{"title":"危象下的腹股沟疝修补术:中国新冠肺炎时代手术结果的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Dhierin Roman Jagdewsing, Wally Elijah, Ahmed A Mohammedzeyn, Omane V Kwakye, Yachin Singh, N M Motachim Mahmud, R A Geehari Mihinsa De Alwis, Masoumeh Rashidi, Hania Moharam, Fariya Iqbal","doi":"10.7602/jmis.2025.28.3.137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide, altering clinical practices and surgical outcomes. However, its specific impact on inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has not been extensively studied. This research investigates the effects of the pandemic on surgical outcomes and the evolution of surgical techniques during the COVID-19 era. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical site infections (SSIs), secondary infections, postsurgical pain, edema, and the shift in surgical techniques in IHR patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective cohort study involving 1,067 patients who underwent elective unilateral IHR from 2018 to 2024 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, who were categorized into three groups based on the time of surgery: pre=pandemic (n = 239), pandemic (n = 592), and post-pandemic (n = 236).Clinical variables included surgical techniques, SSI classification, postsurgical pain, edema, hospitalization duration, and comorbid conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant decrease in superficial and organ/space SSIs during the pandemic, particularly with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Post-pandemic, there was a significant reduction in mild, moderate, and severe pain (OR, 0.085, 0.127, and 0.029; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, there was a marked increase in the use of laparoscopic surgery, from 9.6% pre-pandemic to 77.1% post-pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The post-pandemic group was associated with improved surgical outcomes, including reduced SSI rates, postsurgical pain, and shorter hospital stays, likely due to the increased use of laparoscopic surgery. These findings underscore the importance of adapting surgical approaches in response to crisis-driven changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","volume":"28 3","pages":"137-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inguinal hernia repair under crisis: a retrospective cohort study of surgical outcomes across the COVID-19 era in China.\",\"authors\":\"Dhierin Roman Jagdewsing, Wally Elijah, Ahmed A Mohammedzeyn, Omane V Kwakye, Yachin Singh, N M Motachim Mahmud, R A Geehari Mihinsa De Alwis, Masoumeh Rashidi, Hania Moharam, Fariya Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.7602/jmis.2025.28.3.137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide, altering clinical practices and surgical outcomes. However, its specific impact on inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has not been extensively studied. This research investigates the effects of the pandemic on surgical outcomes and the evolution of surgical techniques during the COVID-19 era. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical site infections (SSIs), secondary infections, postsurgical pain, edema, and the shift in surgical techniques in IHR patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective cohort study involving 1,067 patients who underwent elective unilateral IHR from 2018 to 2024 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, who were categorized into three groups based on the time of surgery: pre=pandemic (n = 239), pandemic (n = 592), and post-pandemic (n = 236).Clinical variables included surgical techniques, SSI classification, postsurgical pain, edema, hospitalization duration, and comorbid conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant decrease in superficial and organ/space SSIs during the pandemic, particularly with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Post-pandemic, there was a significant reduction in mild, moderate, and severe pain (OR, 0.085, 0.127, and 0.029; all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, there was a marked increase in the use of laparoscopic surgery, from 9.6% pre-pandemic to 77.1% post-pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The post-pandemic group was associated with improved surgical outcomes, including reduced SSI rates, postsurgical pain, and shorter hospital stays, likely due to the increased use of laparoscopic surgery. These findings underscore the importance of adapting surgical approaches in response to crisis-driven changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"137-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2025.28.3.137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2025.28.3.137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行影响了全球医疗保健系统,改变了临床实践和手术结果。然而,其对腹股沟疝修复(IHR)的具体影响尚未得到广泛研究。本研究调查了新冠肺炎时代大流行对手术结果的影响以及手术技术的演变。COVID-19大流行对《国际卫生条例》患者手术部位感染、继发感染、术后疼痛、水肿和手术技术转变的影响。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入2018 - 2024年大连医科大学第二附属医院择期单侧IHR患者1067例,根据手术时间分为大流行前(n = 239)、大流行前(n = 592)和大流行后(n = 236) 3组。临床变量包括手术技术、SSI分类、术后疼痛、水肿、住院时间和合并症。结果:大流行期间,体表和器官/间隙ssi显著减少,特别是腹腔镜手术(优势比[OR], 0.13; p = 0.002)。大流行后,轻度、中度和重度疼痛显著减少(OR分别为0.085、0.127和0.029;均p < 0.001)。此外,腹腔镜手术的使用显著增加,从大流行前的9.6%增加到大流行后的77.1% (p < 0.001)。结论:大流行后组与手术结果改善相关,包括SSI发生率降低、术后疼痛和住院时间缩短,这可能是由于腹腔镜手术的使用增加。这些发现强调了适应手术入路以应对危机驱动的变化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inguinal hernia repair under crisis: a retrospective cohort study of surgical outcomes across the COVID-19 era in China.

Inguinal hernia repair under crisis: a retrospective cohort study of surgical outcomes across the COVID-19 era in China.

Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide, altering clinical practices and surgical outcomes. However, its specific impact on inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has not been extensively studied. This research investigates the effects of the pandemic on surgical outcomes and the evolution of surgical techniques during the COVID-19 era. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical site infections (SSIs), secondary infections, postsurgical pain, edema, and the shift in surgical techniques in IHR patients.

Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study involving 1,067 patients who underwent elective unilateral IHR from 2018 to 2024 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, who were categorized into three groups based on the time of surgery: pre=pandemic (n = 239), pandemic (n = 592), and post-pandemic (n = 236).Clinical variables included surgical techniques, SSI classification, postsurgical pain, edema, hospitalization duration, and comorbid conditions.

Results: Significant decrease in superficial and organ/space SSIs during the pandemic, particularly with laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; p = 0.002). Post-pandemic, there was a significant reduction in mild, moderate, and severe pain (OR, 0.085, 0.127, and 0.029; all p < 0.001). Additionally, there was a marked increase in the use of laparoscopic surgery, from 9.6% pre-pandemic to 77.1% post-pandemic (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The post-pandemic group was associated with improved surgical outcomes, including reduced SSI rates, postsurgical pain, and shorter hospital stays, likely due to the increased use of laparoscopic surgery. These findings underscore the importance of adapting surgical approaches in response to crisis-driven changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信