{"title":"从生命到进化:自然和文化系统中存储和界面的区别。","authors":"Kirill Postoutenko","doi":"10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It has been long acknowledged that the functional differentiation between storage and interface, proposed by John von Neumann, is the essential condition for the self-reproduction of living beings: enabling evolution, the fundamental separation of memory from interaction increases the chances of open systems to withstand the all-devouring entropic pressure of the surrounding universe. However, the interest in the distinction has been very unevenly spread between natural and social sciences. This preliminary study is an attempt to fill the gap, at least in part.</div><div>Admittedly, the DNA code shares with human language a considerable number of features facilitating preservation and exchange of information. Those include invariance to environment, universality, stability, redundancy, ability to code elementary (1-bit) information and express it in partially ordered messages, rich grammar and hierarchically ordered semantics.</div><div>To be sure, in the biological world the domination of interface by storage has never been as complete as in the self-reproducing automata envisioned by John von Neumann: the standard direction of information flow (from nucleic acids to proteins) does not – and cannot - exclude the feedback from RNA to DNA. The same reflexivity is even more apparent in culture: while writing and print are usually more conservative and durable then spoken word and hence lend themselves naturally to conservation of canonical information, there is no mandatory and uniform subordination of speech to writing or print in social life. Therefore, it could be argued that culture, unlike nature, relies heavily on second-order practices upholding the differentiation between storage and interface for the purposes of cultural evolution. The whole class of canonical monotheist texts such as Bible or Quran is a poster example of this dynamics, and the final part of this paper seeks to uncover the storage-interface dualism in the monotheist religious communication of the last two millennia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50730,"journal":{"name":"Biosystems","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 105590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From life to evolution: the differentiation between storage and interface in natural and cultural systems\",\"authors\":\"Kirill Postoutenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biosystems.2025.105590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>It has been long acknowledged that the functional differentiation between storage and interface, proposed by John von Neumann, is the essential condition for the self-reproduction of living beings: enabling evolution, the fundamental separation of memory from interaction increases the chances of open systems to withstand the all-devouring entropic pressure of the surrounding universe. However, the interest in the distinction has been very unevenly spread between natural and social sciences. This preliminary study is an attempt to fill the gap, at least in part.</div><div>Admittedly, the DNA code shares with human language a considerable number of features facilitating preservation and exchange of information. Those include invariance to environment, universality, stability, redundancy, ability to code elementary (1-bit) information and express it in partially ordered messages, rich grammar and hierarchically ordered semantics.</div><div>To be sure, in the biological world the domination of interface by storage has never been as complete as in the self-reproducing automata envisioned by John von Neumann: the standard direction of information flow (from nucleic acids to proteins) does not – and cannot - exclude the feedback from RNA to DNA. The same reflexivity is even more apparent in culture: while writing and print are usually more conservative and durable then spoken word and hence lend themselves naturally to conservation of canonical information, there is no mandatory and uniform subordination of speech to writing or print in social life. Therefore, it could be argued that culture, unlike nature, relies heavily on second-order practices upholding the differentiation between storage and interface for the purposes of cultural evolution. The whole class of canonical monotheist texts such as Bible or Quran is a poster example of this dynamics, and the final part of this paper seeks to uncover the storage-interface dualism in the monotheist religious communication of the last two millennia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosystems\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosystems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030326472500200X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosystems","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030326472500200X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
约翰·冯·诺伊曼(John von Neumann)提出的存储和接口之间的功能差异是生物自我繁殖的必要条件,这一点早已被人们所承认:使进化成为可能,记忆与交互的基本分离增加了开放系统承受周围宇宙吞噬一切的熵压的机会。然而,对这种区别的兴趣在自然科学和社会科学之间分布得非常不均匀。这项初步研究试图至少部分地填补这一空白。不可否认,DNA密码与人类语言在促进信息保存和交换方面有相当多的共同点。它们包括对环境的不变性、通用性、稳定性、冗余性、对基本(1位)信息进行编码并以部分有序的消息表示的能力、丰富的语法和分层有序的语义。可以肯定的是,在生物世界中,存储对界面的支配从来没有像约翰·冯·诺伊曼(John von Neumann)设想的自我复制自动机那样彻底:信息流的标准方向(从核酸到蛋白质)没有——也不能——排除RNA到DNA的反馈。同样的反身性在文化中表现得更为明显:虽然书写和印刷通常比口语更保守、更持久,因此它们自然地有助于规范信息的保存,但在社会生活中,没有强制性的、统一的从属于书写或印刷的话语。因此,可以说,文化与自然不同,它在很大程度上依赖于二级实践,以维护文化进化的存储和接口之间的区别。《圣经》或《古兰经》等一神论经典文本就是这种动态的典型例子,本文的最后一部分试图揭示过去两千年一神论宗教交流中的存储接口二元论。
From life to evolution: the differentiation between storage and interface in natural and cultural systems
It has been long acknowledged that the functional differentiation between storage and interface, proposed by John von Neumann, is the essential condition for the self-reproduction of living beings: enabling evolution, the fundamental separation of memory from interaction increases the chances of open systems to withstand the all-devouring entropic pressure of the surrounding universe. However, the interest in the distinction has been very unevenly spread between natural and social sciences. This preliminary study is an attempt to fill the gap, at least in part.
Admittedly, the DNA code shares with human language a considerable number of features facilitating preservation and exchange of information. Those include invariance to environment, universality, stability, redundancy, ability to code elementary (1-bit) information and express it in partially ordered messages, rich grammar and hierarchically ordered semantics.
To be sure, in the biological world the domination of interface by storage has never been as complete as in the self-reproducing automata envisioned by John von Neumann: the standard direction of information flow (from nucleic acids to proteins) does not – and cannot - exclude the feedback from RNA to DNA. The same reflexivity is even more apparent in culture: while writing and print are usually more conservative and durable then spoken word and hence lend themselves naturally to conservation of canonical information, there is no mandatory and uniform subordination of speech to writing or print in social life. Therefore, it could be argued that culture, unlike nature, relies heavily on second-order practices upholding the differentiation between storage and interface for the purposes of cultural evolution. The whole class of canonical monotheist texts such as Bible or Quran is a poster example of this dynamics, and the final part of this paper seeks to uncover the storage-interface dualism in the monotheist religious communication of the last two millennia.
期刊介绍:
BioSystems encourages experimental, computational, and theoretical articles that link biology, evolutionary thinking, and the information processing sciences. The link areas form a circle that encompasses the fundamental nature of biological information processing, computational modeling of complex biological systems, evolutionary models of computation, the application of biological principles to the design of novel computing systems, and the use of biomolecular materials to synthesize artificial systems that capture essential principles of natural biological information processing.