将USMLE第一步转换为通过或不通过:对女性或代表性不足群体申请人的潜在影响。

HCA healthcare journal of medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.36518/2689-0216.1895
Haris Ahmed, Peter Yu, Brendan Rosamond, Jonathan Lall, Scott Zimmerle, Said Maldonado, Nicole Lyons, Ashlynn N Mills, Yoolim Alex Seo, Angelica C Rodriquez, Jacqueline E Levesque, Oluwatunmininu A Anwoju, Zuhair Ali, Rajeev Raghavan, Mike Liang
{"title":"将USMLE第一步转换为通过或不通过:对女性或代表性不足群体申请人的潜在影响。","authors":"Haris Ahmed, Peter Yu, Brendan Rosamond, Jonathan Lall, Scott Zimmerle, Said Maldonado, Nicole Lyons, Ashlynn N Mills, Yoolim Alex Seo, Angelica C Rodriquez, Jacqueline E Levesque, Oluwatunmininu A Anwoju, Zuhair Ali, Rajeev Raghavan, Mike Liang","doi":"10.36518/2689-0216.1895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In January 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam became pass/fail and the transition to using USMLE Step 2 scores for residency interview screening appeared imminent. While this change was intended to result in holistic reviews of residency applicants, the impact remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine how USMLE scoring changes might affect female candidates and applicants from underrepresented groups (URM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of all applicants to a single institution. Data for applicants were extracted from their 2021-2022 residency applications and included age, race, sex, medical school, region, USMLE Step 1 score, and USMLE Step 2 scores. All applicants who graduated from a US medical school with both USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores were eligible for inclusion. Our primary outcome was the difference between USMLE Step 1 versus Step 2 scores. Two comparisons were made; female candidates were compared to male candidates and URM compared to non-URM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On regression analysis, we noted that female candidates (coefficient = 4.007; 95% CI, 2.64-5.37, <i>P</i> < .001) had greater improvements between USMLE Step I and Step II scores compared to male applicants, while URM (coefficient = -5.056; 95% CI, -7.6 to -2.5, <i>P</i> < .005) demonstrated smaller differences between USMLE scores compared to the reference group (non-URM).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Making USMLE Step 1 pass/fail may benefit female candidates during the interview process, while adversely impacting URM. As the application process evolves, the impacts on female and URM need to be carefully evaluated to achieve equitable representation in residency programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73198,"journal":{"name":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","volume":"6 4","pages":"311-318"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Converting USMLE Step 1 to Pass or Fail: The Potential Impact on Applicants Who Are Female or From Underrepresented Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Haris Ahmed, Peter Yu, Brendan Rosamond, Jonathan Lall, Scott Zimmerle, Said Maldonado, Nicole Lyons, Ashlynn N Mills, Yoolim Alex Seo, Angelica C Rodriquez, Jacqueline E Levesque, Oluwatunmininu A Anwoju, Zuhair Ali, Rajeev Raghavan, Mike Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.36518/2689-0216.1895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In January 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam became pass/fail and the transition to using USMLE Step 2 scores for residency interview screening appeared imminent. While this change was intended to result in holistic reviews of residency applicants, the impact remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine how USMLE scoring changes might affect female candidates and applicants from underrepresented groups (URM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of all applicants to a single institution. Data for applicants were extracted from their 2021-2022 residency applications and included age, race, sex, medical school, region, USMLE Step 1 score, and USMLE Step 2 scores. All applicants who graduated from a US medical school with both USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores were eligible for inclusion. Our primary outcome was the difference between USMLE Step 1 versus Step 2 scores. Two comparisons were made; female candidates were compared to male candidates and URM compared to non-URM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On regression analysis, we noted that female candidates (coefficient = 4.007; 95% CI, 2.64-5.37, <i>P</i> < .001) had greater improvements between USMLE Step I and Step II scores compared to male applicants, while URM (coefficient = -5.056; 95% CI, -7.6 to -2.5, <i>P</i> < .005) demonstrated smaller differences between USMLE scores compared to the reference group (non-URM).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Making USMLE Step 1 pass/fail may benefit female candidates during the interview process, while adversely impacting URM. As the application process evolves, the impacts on female and URM need to be carefully evaluated to achieve equitable representation in residency programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HCA healthcare journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"311-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HCA healthcare journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2022年1月,美国医疗执照考试(USMLE)第一步考试变为通过/不及格,过渡到使用USMLE第二步分数进行住院医师面试筛选似乎迫在眉睫。虽然这一变化的目的是对居留申请进行全面审查,但其影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们旨在确定USMLE评分变化如何影响女性候选人和来自代表性不足群体(URM)的申请人。方法:我们对单一机构的所有申请人进行了回顾性横断面研究。申请人的数据从其2021-2022年住院医师申请中提取,包括年龄、种族、性别、医学院、地区、USMLE第1步得分和USMLE第2步得分。所有从美国医学院毕业并获得USMLE第1步和第2步成绩的申请人都有资格入选。我们的主要结局是USMLE第1步和第2步评分的差异。做了两个比较;女性候选人与男性候选人进行比较,URM与非URM进行比较。结果:在回归分析中,我们注意到女性候选人(系数= 4.007;95% CI, 2.64-5.37, P < .001)与男性申请人相比,USMLE第一步和第二步得分有更大的改善,而URM(系数= -5.056;95% CI, -7.6至-2.5,P < .005)与参考组(非URM)相比,USMLE得分之间的差异较小。结论:让USMLE第一步通过/不通过可能对女性候选人在面试过程中有利,而对URM产生不利影响。随着申请程序的发展,需要仔细评估对女性和URM的影响,以实现住院医师计划中的公平代表权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Converting USMLE Step 1 to Pass or Fail: The Potential Impact on Applicants Who Are Female or From Underrepresented Groups.

Background: In January 2022, the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam became pass/fail and the transition to using USMLE Step 2 scores for residency interview screening appeared imminent. While this change was intended to result in holistic reviews of residency applicants, the impact remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine how USMLE scoring changes might affect female candidates and applicants from underrepresented groups (URM).

Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of all applicants to a single institution. Data for applicants were extracted from their 2021-2022 residency applications and included age, race, sex, medical school, region, USMLE Step 1 score, and USMLE Step 2 scores. All applicants who graduated from a US medical school with both USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 scores were eligible for inclusion. Our primary outcome was the difference between USMLE Step 1 versus Step 2 scores. Two comparisons were made; female candidates were compared to male candidates and URM compared to non-URM.

Results: On regression analysis, we noted that female candidates (coefficient = 4.007; 95% CI, 2.64-5.37, P < .001) had greater improvements between USMLE Step I and Step II scores compared to male applicants, while URM (coefficient = -5.056; 95% CI, -7.6 to -2.5, P < .005) demonstrated smaller differences between USMLE scores compared to the reference group (non-URM).

Conclusion: Making USMLE Step 1 pass/fail may benefit female candidates during the interview process, while adversely impacting URM. As the application process evolves, the impacts on female and URM need to be carefully evaluated to achieve equitable representation in residency programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信