加沙地带政府医院手术室护士遵守感染控制、安全措施、沟通和规程的情况。

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1657817
Mohammed A Abu Rahmah, Bothyna B ELssyed Etewa, Fatma Al'Haj Ahmad, Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi
{"title":"加沙地带政府医院手术室护士遵守感染控制、安全措施、沟通和规程的情况。","authors":"Mohammed A Abu Rahmah, Bothyna B ELssyed Etewa, Fatma Al'Haj Ahmad, Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1657817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed nurses' compliance with infection control, safety measures, communication, and protocol adherence in operating rooms of government hospitals in Gaza.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 across the three main governmental hospitals in Gaza: Al Shifa Medical Complex, Nasser Medical Complex, and Gaza European Hospital. A census sampling method included 150 nurses working in operating rooms who met inclusion criteria. Data were collected using a structured, validated questionnaire covering demographics and six domains of patient safety based on the WHO Patient Safety Assessment Tool. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with significance set at <i>p</i>-value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 nurses (78% male, mean age 32.94 ± 7.3 years); most (71.4%) held a bachelor's degree; and 43.3% had specialized operating room training. Positive responses on sterilization and cleaning averaged 46.7%, highest at Al Shifa (51.8%). Key practices such as instrument transport in sealed trolleys (80.7%) and immediate cleaning post-procedure (83.3%) were well reported. Intraoperative precaution compliance was 73.3%, with high rates of proper hand scrubbing (84.7%) but lower adherence to checklist completion (65.3%). Immediate post-operative monitoring adherence was 68.7%, with oxygen saturation measurement (88%) and pain assessment (77.3%) rated highly. Communication satisfaction was 72.7%, though cooperation during patient positioning was only 46%. About 66.7% reported positive views on policies and training, yet 75.3% expressed a need for more patient safety education. A high incidence of adverse events was reported by 93.3%, with reluctance to document errors noted by 68%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights moderate compliance with infection control in Gaza Strip operating rooms but reveals significant gaps in protocol adherence, documentation, and error reporting. It highlights the need for better training, resource support, and a non-punitive safety culture. Policymakers and hospital leaders must prioritize these to improve surgical safety and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1657817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' compliance with infection control, safety measures, communication, and protocol adherence in operating rooms of governmental hospitals in the Gaza strip.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed A Abu Rahmah, Bothyna B ELssyed Etewa, Fatma Al'Haj Ahmad, Abdel Hamid El Bilbeisi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2025.1657817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed nurses' compliance with infection control, safety measures, communication, and protocol adherence in operating rooms of government hospitals in Gaza.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 across the three main governmental hospitals in Gaza: Al Shifa Medical Complex, Nasser Medical Complex, and Gaza European Hospital. A census sampling method included 150 nurses working in operating rooms who met inclusion criteria. Data were collected using a structured, validated questionnaire covering demographics and six domains of patient safety based on the WHO Patient Safety Assessment Tool. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with significance set at <i>p</i>-value < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 nurses (78% male, mean age 32.94 ± 7.3 years); most (71.4%) held a bachelor's degree; and 43.3% had specialized operating room training. Positive responses on sterilization and cleaning averaged 46.7%, highest at Al Shifa (51.8%). Key practices such as instrument transport in sealed trolleys (80.7%) and immediate cleaning post-procedure (83.3%) were well reported. Intraoperative precaution compliance was 73.3%, with high rates of proper hand scrubbing (84.7%) but lower adherence to checklist completion (65.3%). Immediate post-operative monitoring adherence was 68.7%, with oxygen saturation measurement (88%) and pain assessment (77.3%) rated highly. Communication satisfaction was 72.7%, though cooperation during patient positioning was only 46%. About 66.7% reported positive views on policies and training, yet 75.3% expressed a need for more patient safety education. A high incidence of adverse events was reported by 93.3%, with reluctance to document errors noted by 68%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights moderate compliance with infection control in Gaza Strip operating rooms but reveals significant gaps in protocol adherence, documentation, and error reporting. It highlights the need for better training, resource support, and a non-punitive safety culture. Policymakers and hospital leaders must prioritize these to improve surgical safety and patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1657817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1657817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1657817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了加沙政府医院手术室护士对感染控制、安全措施、沟通和协议遵守情况的依从性。方法:在2023年对加沙的三家主要政府医院:Al Shifa医疗中心、Nasser医疗中心和加沙欧洲医院进行了横断面研究。采用人口普查抽样法对符合入选标准的150名手术室护士进行调查。使用结构化的、经过验证的问卷收集数据,该问卷基于世卫组织患者安全评估工具,涵盖人口统计学和患者安全的六个领域。结果:150名护士中,男性占78%,平均年龄32.94±7.3岁;大多数(71.4%)拥有学士学位;43.3%接受过手术室专业培训。对灭菌和清洁的正面回答平均为46.7%,最高的是Al Shifa(51.8%)。关键操作,如仪器在密封小车中运输(80.7%)和术后立即清洁(83.3%)得到了很好的报道。术中预防依从性为73.3%,正确洗手率高(84.7%),但对检查表完成的依从性较低(65.3%)。术后立即监测依从性为68.7%,其中血氧饱和度测量(88%)和疼痛评估(77.3%)评分较高。沟通满意度为72.7%,患者体位配合度仅为46%。约66.7%的受访者对政策和培训持积极态度,但75.3%的受访者表示需要更多的患者安全教育。不良事件的高发率为93.3%,不愿记录错误的发生率为68%。结论:本研究强调了加沙地带手术室感染控制的中等依从性,但揭示了协议依从性、文件和错误报告方面的重大差距。它强调需要更好的培训、资源支持和非惩罚性的安全文化。决策者和医院领导必须优先考虑这些问题,以改善手术安全和患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' compliance with infection control, safety measures, communication, and protocol adherence in operating rooms of governmental hospitals in the Gaza strip.

Background: This study assessed nurses' compliance with infection control, safety measures, communication, and protocol adherence in operating rooms of government hospitals in Gaza.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2023 across the three main governmental hospitals in Gaza: Al Shifa Medical Complex, Nasser Medical Complex, and Gaza European Hospital. A census sampling method included 150 nurses working in operating rooms who met inclusion criteria. Data were collected using a structured, validated questionnaire covering demographics and six domains of patient safety based on the WHO Patient Safety Assessment Tool. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with significance set at p-value < 0.05.

Results: Among 150 nurses (78% male, mean age 32.94 ± 7.3 years); most (71.4%) held a bachelor's degree; and 43.3% had specialized operating room training. Positive responses on sterilization and cleaning averaged 46.7%, highest at Al Shifa (51.8%). Key practices such as instrument transport in sealed trolleys (80.7%) and immediate cleaning post-procedure (83.3%) were well reported. Intraoperative precaution compliance was 73.3%, with high rates of proper hand scrubbing (84.7%) but lower adherence to checklist completion (65.3%). Immediate post-operative monitoring adherence was 68.7%, with oxygen saturation measurement (88%) and pain assessment (77.3%) rated highly. Communication satisfaction was 72.7%, though cooperation during patient positioning was only 46%. About 66.7% reported positive views on policies and training, yet 75.3% expressed a need for more patient safety education. A high incidence of adverse events was reported by 93.3%, with reluctance to document errors noted by 68%.

Conclusion: This study highlights moderate compliance with infection control in Gaza Strip operating rooms but reveals significant gaps in protocol adherence, documentation, and error reporting. It highlights the need for better training, resource support, and a non-punitive safety culture. Policymakers and hospital leaders must prioritize these to improve surgical safety and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信