公立医学院和私立医疗保健提供者之间的价值观驱动的学术联系:探索关键意见领袖的看法。

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1655759
Leon Du Preez, Farah Otaki, Timo Clemens, Suleiman Al-Hammadi, Adrian Stanley, Samuel B Ho, Paddy Kilian, Pietie Loubser, Riad Bayoumi, Mutairu Ezimokhai, Barry Bedford, Tarek Fathey, Reem AlGurg, Hanan Al Suwaidi, Amer A Sharif, Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali
{"title":"公立医学院和私立医疗保健提供者之间的价值观驱动的学术联系:探索关键意见领袖的看法。","authors":"Leon Du Preez, Farah Otaki, Timo Clemens, Suleiman Al-Hammadi, Adrian Stanley, Samuel B Ho, Paddy Kilian, Pietie Loubser, Riad Bayoumi, Mutairu Ezimokhai, Barry Bedford, Tarek Fathey, Reem AlGurg, Hanan Al Suwaidi, Amer A Sharif, Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1655759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In an Academic Health System model where university and clinical care institutions are separate entities, robust agreements are needed for effective working relationships among the involved institutions. There is paucity in the literature around reports of such affiliations, especially those relating to public private partnerships. Accordingly, the overall purpose of this study is to explore the perception of key opinion leaders about the development of a values-driven affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider in the first integrated Academic Health System in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, namely: Dubai Health. The process of developing the respective affiliation is based on the principles of action research. It involved ongoing cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study relied on a qualitative phenomenological research design, where 18 primary stakeholders, who played an active role in making the affiliation, were given the option of providing their feedback either in writing, using a tailor-made questionnaire, or in the form of a semi-structured interview. Constructivist epistemology constituted the basis of the entailed interpretive qualitative analysis, which followed the six-step analysis approach initially introduced by Braun and Clarke (2006).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis led, as per this study's conceptual framework: \"Public Private Affiliation Journey\", to two interconnected themes, namely: Key Milestones and Driving Forces. Within Key Milestones, seven sequential categories were identified: Observing a triggering need, Finding a good match, Seizing the opportunity, Arriving at a common ground, Looking ahead, Venturing for the right reasons, and Reaping the benefits. Within the second theme: Driving Forces, the following three categories were identified: Aspiring for success, Leveraging human qualities, and Doing things the right way.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study showed that there is a latent potential in forming public private partnerships that can enable the formation and development of Academic Health Systems. It also showed how the guidelines of action research can be set as the basis of the process of partnership formation, and how following those guidelines in such an endeavor maximizes value for all. In addition, it clearly brought forth the importance of having a robust governance structure with committed and engaged leadership, and clear communication channels, and of equipping the physicians with the skills needed to be effective educators. Lastly, this study introduced the \"Public Private Affiliation Journey\" conceptual framework, which can be deployed in \"federated\" Academic Health Systems worldwide to increase the chances of success of public private partnerships and to maximize the value attained through them.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1655759"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A values-driven academic affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider: exploring the perceptions of key opinion leaders.\",\"authors\":\"Leon Du Preez, Farah Otaki, Timo Clemens, Suleiman Al-Hammadi, Adrian Stanley, Samuel B Ho, Paddy Kilian, Pietie Loubser, Riad Bayoumi, Mutairu Ezimokhai, Barry Bedford, Tarek Fathey, Reem AlGurg, Hanan Al Suwaidi, Amer A Sharif, Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2025.1655759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In an Academic Health System model where university and clinical care institutions are separate entities, robust agreements are needed for effective working relationships among the involved institutions. There is paucity in the literature around reports of such affiliations, especially those relating to public private partnerships. Accordingly, the overall purpose of this study is to explore the perception of key opinion leaders about the development of a values-driven affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider in the first integrated Academic Health System in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, namely: Dubai Health. The process of developing the respective affiliation is based on the principles of action research. It involved ongoing cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study relied on a qualitative phenomenological research design, where 18 primary stakeholders, who played an active role in making the affiliation, were given the option of providing their feedback either in writing, using a tailor-made questionnaire, or in the form of a semi-structured interview. Constructivist epistemology constituted the basis of the entailed interpretive qualitative analysis, which followed the six-step analysis approach initially introduced by Braun and Clarke (2006).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The qualitative analysis led, as per this study's conceptual framework: \\\"Public Private Affiliation Journey\\\", to two interconnected themes, namely: Key Milestones and Driving Forces. Within Key Milestones, seven sequential categories were identified: Observing a triggering need, Finding a good match, Seizing the opportunity, Arriving at a common ground, Looking ahead, Venturing for the right reasons, and Reaping the benefits. Within the second theme: Driving Forces, the following three categories were identified: Aspiring for success, Leveraging human qualities, and Doing things the right way.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study showed that there is a latent potential in forming public private partnerships that can enable the formation and development of Academic Health Systems. It also showed how the guidelines of action research can be set as the basis of the process of partnership formation, and how following those guidelines in such an endeavor maximizes value for all. In addition, it clearly brought forth the importance of having a robust governance structure with committed and engaged leadership, and clear communication channels, and of equipping the physicians with the skills needed to be effective educators. Lastly, this study introduced the \\\"Public Private Affiliation Journey\\\" conceptual framework, which can be deployed in \\\"federated\\\" Academic Health Systems worldwide to increase the chances of success of public private partnerships and to maximize the value attained through them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1655759\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1655759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1655759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在学术卫生系统模型中,大学和临床护理机构是独立的实体,需要强有力的协议才能在相关机构之间建立有效的工作关系。文献中缺乏关于这种关系的报道,特别是那些与公私伙伴关系有关的报道。因此,本研究的总体目的是探讨关键意见领袖对阿拉伯联合酋长国迪拜首个综合学术健康系统(即迪拜健康)中公立医学院和私立医疗保健提供者之间价值观驱动关系发展的看法。发展各自从属关系的过程是基于行动研究的原则。它包括计划、行动、观察和反思的持续循环。方法:本研究依赖于定性现象学研究设计,其中18个主要利益相关者在建立联系方面发挥了积极作用,他们可以选择以书面形式、使用量身定制的问卷或以半结构化访谈的形式提供反馈。建构主义认识论构成了必然解释性定性分析的基础,它遵循了布劳恩和克拉克(2006)最初提出的六步分析方法。结果:根据本研究的概念框架“公私合作之旅”,定性分析得出两个相互关联的主题,即:关键里程碑和驱动力。在关键里程碑中,确定了七个连续的类别:观察触发需求,找到一个好的匹配,抓住机会,到达共同点,展望未来,为正确的理由冒险,收获利益。在第二个主题“驱动力”中,确定了以下三类:渴望成功、利用人的品质和以正确的方式做事。讨论:这项研究表明,建立公私伙伴关系具有潜在的潜力,可以促进学术卫生系统的形成和发展。它还表明如何将行动研究的指导方针作为建立伙伴关系过程的基础,以及如何在这种努力中遵循这些指导方针使所有人的价值最大化。此外,它清楚地提出了拥有一个强有力的治理结构的重要性,具有承诺和参与的领导,明确的沟通渠道,以及为医生提供有效教育所需的技能。最后,本研究引入了“公私合作之旅”概念框架,该框架可在全球“联合”学术卫生系统中部署,以增加公私合作伙伴关系成功的机会,并通过它们实现价值最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A values-driven academic affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider: exploring the perceptions of key opinion leaders.

A values-driven academic affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider: exploring the perceptions of key opinion leaders.

A values-driven academic affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider: exploring the perceptions of key opinion leaders.

A values-driven academic affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider: exploring the perceptions of key opinion leaders.

Introduction: In an Academic Health System model where university and clinical care institutions are separate entities, robust agreements are needed for effective working relationships among the involved institutions. There is paucity in the literature around reports of such affiliations, especially those relating to public private partnerships. Accordingly, the overall purpose of this study is to explore the perception of key opinion leaders about the development of a values-driven affiliation between a public medical school and a private healthcare provider in the first integrated Academic Health System in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, namely: Dubai Health. The process of developing the respective affiliation is based on the principles of action research. It involved ongoing cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting.

Methods: This study relied on a qualitative phenomenological research design, where 18 primary stakeholders, who played an active role in making the affiliation, were given the option of providing their feedback either in writing, using a tailor-made questionnaire, or in the form of a semi-structured interview. Constructivist epistemology constituted the basis of the entailed interpretive qualitative analysis, which followed the six-step analysis approach initially introduced by Braun and Clarke (2006).

Results: The qualitative analysis led, as per this study's conceptual framework: "Public Private Affiliation Journey", to two interconnected themes, namely: Key Milestones and Driving Forces. Within Key Milestones, seven sequential categories were identified: Observing a triggering need, Finding a good match, Seizing the opportunity, Arriving at a common ground, Looking ahead, Venturing for the right reasons, and Reaping the benefits. Within the second theme: Driving Forces, the following three categories were identified: Aspiring for success, Leveraging human qualities, and Doing things the right way.

Discussion: This study showed that there is a latent potential in forming public private partnerships that can enable the formation and development of Academic Health Systems. It also showed how the guidelines of action research can be set as the basis of the process of partnership formation, and how following those guidelines in such an endeavor maximizes value for all. In addition, it clearly brought forth the importance of having a robust governance structure with committed and engaged leadership, and clear communication channels, and of equipping the physicians with the skills needed to be effective educators. Lastly, this study introduced the "Public Private Affiliation Journey" conceptual framework, which can be deployed in "federated" Academic Health Systems worldwide to increase the chances of success of public private partnerships and to maximize the value attained through them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信