运动学仪器评估量化脑卒中后患者的代偿策略。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Alessandro Scano, Eleonora Guanziroli, Cristina Brambilla, Alessandro Specchia, Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti, Franco Molteni
{"title":"运动学仪器评估量化脑卒中后患者的代偿策略。","authors":"Alessandro Scano, Eleonora Guanziroli, Cristina Brambilla, Alessandro Specchia, Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti, Franco Molteni","doi":"10.1007/s11517-025-03439-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical practice, the upper limb function of hemiplegic post-stroke patients is commonly evaluated using clinical tests and questionnaires. Performing a reliable investigation of compensatory strategies adopted for the upper limb movement may shed light on the basis of motor control and the mechanism of functional recovery. To quantitatively evaluate the compensatory strategies in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, we conducted an observational study in which 36 hemiplegic patients were enrolled and were stratified according to the Fugl-Meyer score. We assessed compensatory strategies in upper limb movements, specifically reaching (RCH) and hand-to-mouth (HTM) movements, using the Kinect V2 device. 11 severe, 8 severe-moderate, 9 moderate-mild, and 8 mild patients and 17 controls participated in the study. Our results showed that severe, severe-moderate, and moderate-mild patients can be discriminated from healthy participants in almost all parameters. In particular, patients showed a reduced ROM of the shoulder in RCH, higher shoulder and elbow vertical displacement, and lower wrist vertical displacement in HTM. Interestingly, compensatory parameters also discriminate mild patients from healthy controls, such as head frontal and vertical displacements. Our protocol works effectively and the instrumental assessment of compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients allows to discriminate different levels of impairments even with low-cost devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic instrumental assessment quantifies compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Scano, Eleonora Guanziroli, Cristina Brambilla, Alessandro Specchia, Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti, Franco Molteni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11517-025-03439-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical practice, the upper limb function of hemiplegic post-stroke patients is commonly evaluated using clinical tests and questionnaires. Performing a reliable investigation of compensatory strategies adopted for the upper limb movement may shed light on the basis of motor control and the mechanism of functional recovery. To quantitatively evaluate the compensatory strategies in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, we conducted an observational study in which 36 hemiplegic patients were enrolled and were stratified according to the Fugl-Meyer score. We assessed compensatory strategies in upper limb movements, specifically reaching (RCH) and hand-to-mouth (HTM) movements, using the Kinect V2 device. 11 severe, 8 severe-moderate, 9 moderate-mild, and 8 mild patients and 17 controls participated in the study. Our results showed that severe, severe-moderate, and moderate-mild patients can be discriminated from healthy participants in almost all parameters. In particular, patients showed a reduced ROM of the shoulder in RCH, higher shoulder and elbow vertical displacement, and lower wrist vertical displacement in HTM. Interestingly, compensatory parameters also discriminate mild patients from healthy controls, such as head frontal and vertical displacements. Our protocol works effectively and the instrumental assessment of compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients allows to discriminate different levels of impairments even with low-cost devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03439-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-025-03439-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床实践中,卒中后偏瘫患者的上肢功能通常采用临床试验和问卷调查的方式进行评估。对上肢运动所采用的代偿策略进行可靠的研究可能会揭示运动控制的基础和功能恢复的机制。为了定量评估卒中后偏瘫患者的代偿策略,我们进行了一项观察性研究,招募了36名偏瘫患者,并根据Fugl-Meyer评分进行分层。我们使用Kinect V2设备评估上肢运动的补偿策略,特别是伸手(RCH)和手到嘴(HTM)运动。重度11例,重度中度8例,中度-轻度9例,轻度8例,对照17例。我们的研究结果显示,在几乎所有的参数中都可以将重度、重度中度和中度-轻度患者与健康参与者区分开来。特别是,患者在RCH中表现为肩部的ROM减少,在HTM中表现为更高的肩关节和肘关节垂直位移,以及更低的腕关节垂直位移。有趣的是,代偿参数也能将轻度患者与健康对照区分开来,如头部正面位移和垂直位移。我们的方案有效地工作,并且对卒中后患者代偿策略的工具评估允许区分不同程度的损伤,即使使用低成本的设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinematic instrumental assessment quantifies compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients.

In clinical practice, the upper limb function of hemiplegic post-stroke patients is commonly evaluated using clinical tests and questionnaires. Performing a reliable investigation of compensatory strategies adopted for the upper limb movement may shed light on the basis of motor control and the mechanism of functional recovery. To quantitatively evaluate the compensatory strategies in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, we conducted an observational study in which 36 hemiplegic patients were enrolled and were stratified according to the Fugl-Meyer score. We assessed compensatory strategies in upper limb movements, specifically reaching (RCH) and hand-to-mouth (HTM) movements, using the Kinect V2 device. 11 severe, 8 severe-moderate, 9 moderate-mild, and 8 mild patients and 17 controls participated in the study. Our results showed that severe, severe-moderate, and moderate-mild patients can be discriminated from healthy participants in almost all parameters. In particular, patients showed a reduced ROM of the shoulder in RCH, higher shoulder and elbow vertical displacement, and lower wrist vertical displacement in HTM. Interestingly, compensatory parameters also discriminate mild patients from healthy controls, such as head frontal and vertical displacements. Our protocol works effectively and the instrumental assessment of compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients allows to discriminate different levels of impairments even with low-cost devices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信