Nicolas P Goldstein Novick, Peter J Veazie, Elaine L Hill, Eva K Pressman, Peter G Szilagyi, Timothy D Nelin, Scott A Lorch
{"title":"怀孕期间增加医疗补助资格对医疗补助利用和胎龄的影响。","authors":"Nicolas P Goldstein Novick, Peter J Veazie, Elaine L Hill, Eva K Pressman, Peter G Szilagyi, Timothy D Nelin, Scott A Lorch","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of increased Medicaid income eligibility during pregnancy on payment source for prenatal care and birth and on gestational age at birth (GAb).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We performed a quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences study comparing two increases in Medicaid income eligibility during pregnancy to two control states with data from 2007 to 2010: (Dyad 1) Ohio (expanded from 150% to 200% of the Federal Poverty level [FPL]) versus Pennsylvania and (Dyad 2) Wisconsin (185% to 250% FPL) versus Michigan. We performed multinomial logistic regression to assess the impact of increased Medicaid eligibility on the following key outcome variables: payment source for prenatal care and birth and GAb.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We utilized CDC Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data (2007-2010) and limited analysis to singleton, in-state live births. After re-weighting for PRAMS survey design, our analytical sample represented about 540,000 births.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>In the higher-income Wisconsin-Michigan dyad, increased Medicaid eligibility during pregnancy significantly increased exclusive Medicaid coverage for prenatal care (7.0%, 95% CI 2.9% to 11.1%) and birth (8.3%, 4.3% to 12.4%). Simultaneously, private insurance coverage dropped for prenatal care (-4.0%, -7.7% to -0.3%) and birth (-3.7%, -7.2% to -0.2%) while self-payment decreased only for birth (-1.8%, -3.5% to -0.2%). In the lower-income Ohio-Pennsylvania dyad, the only statistically significant effects on payment source were decreases in the likelihood of a payment source of other for prenatal care (-3.3%, -6.2% to -0.3%) and birth (-4.7%, -7.9% to -1.6%). There were no statistically significant effects on GAb across both dyads.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased Medicaid eligibility during pregnancy for individuals of higher income seems to improve utilization of exclusive Medicaid with diminished uninsurance but also less private insurance after accounting for indicators of socioeconomic advantage but has no clear impact on GAb. Medicaid policy should balance reducing uninsurance with directing scarce resources to high-risk individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70037"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Increased Medicaid Eligibility During Pregnancy on Medicaid Utilization and Gestational Age.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas P Goldstein Novick, Peter J Veazie, Elaine L Hill, Eva K Pressman, Peter G Szilagyi, Timothy D Nelin, Scott A Lorch\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of increased Medicaid income eligibility during pregnancy on payment source for prenatal care and birth and on gestational age at birth (GAb).</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We performed a quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences study comparing two increases in Medicaid income eligibility during pregnancy to two control states with data from 2007 to 2010: (Dyad 1) Ohio (expanded from 150% to 200% of the Federal Poverty level [FPL]) versus Pennsylvania and (Dyad 2) Wisconsin (185% to 250% FPL) versus Michigan. We performed multinomial logistic regression to assess the impact of increased Medicaid eligibility on the following key outcome variables: payment source for prenatal care and birth and GAb.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We utilized CDC Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data (2007-2010) and limited analysis to singleton, in-state live births. After re-weighting for PRAMS survey design, our analytical sample represented about 540,000 births.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>In the higher-income Wisconsin-Michigan dyad, increased Medicaid eligibility during pregnancy significantly increased exclusive Medicaid coverage for prenatal care (7.0%, 95% CI 2.9% to 11.1%) and birth (8.3%, 4.3% to 12.4%). Simultaneously, private insurance coverage dropped for prenatal care (-4.0%, -7.7% to -0.3%) and birth (-3.7%, -7.2% to -0.2%) while self-payment decreased only for birth (-1.8%, -3.5% to -0.2%). In the lower-income Ohio-Pennsylvania dyad, the only statistically significant effects on payment source were decreases in the likelihood of a payment source of other for prenatal care (-3.3%, -6.2% to -0.3%) and birth (-4.7%, -7.9% to -1.6%). There were no statistically significant effects on GAb across both dyads.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased Medicaid eligibility during pregnancy for individuals of higher income seems to improve utilization of exclusive Medicaid with diminished uninsurance but also less private insurance after accounting for indicators of socioeconomic advantage but has no clear impact on GAb. Medicaid policy should balance reducing uninsurance with directing scarce resources to high-risk individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70037\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估孕期医疗补助收入资格增加对产前护理和分娩支付来源以及出生胎龄(GAb)的影响。研究设置和设计:我们进行了一项准实验,差异中差异研究,比较了两个对照州在怀孕期间医疗补助收入资格的两次增加,数据来自2007年至2010年:(Dyad 1)俄亥俄州(从联邦贫困水平[FPL]的150%扩大到200%)与宾夕法尼亚州和(Dyad 2)威斯康星州(从185%扩大到250% FPL)与密歇根州。我们使用多项逻辑回归来评估增加医疗补助资格对以下关键结果变量的影响:产前护理和分娩的支付来源和GAb。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用疾病预防控制中心妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)数据(2007-2010年),并对单胎和州内活产婴儿进行有限分析。在对PRAMS调查设计重新加权后,我们的分析样本代表了大约54万名新生儿。主要发现:在高收入的威斯康辛-密歇根双组中,怀孕期间医疗补助资格的增加显著增加了产前护理(7.0%,95% CI 2.9%至11.1%)和分娩(8.3%,4.3%至12.4%)的独家医疗补助覆盖率。与此同时,私人保险的产前护理(-4.0%,-7.7%,-0.3%)和生育(-3.7%,-7.2%,-0.2%)的保险覆盖率有所下降,而自付保险的保险覆盖率只有生育(-1.8%,-3.5%,-0.2%)有所下降。在收入较低的俄亥俄州和宾夕法尼亚州,对支付来源的唯一统计显著影响是产前护理(-3.3%,-6.2%至-0.3%)和分娩(-4.7%,-7.9%至-1.6%)的其他支付来源的可能性降低。在两对夫妇中,GAb没有统计学上的显著影响。结论:考虑到社会经济优势指标后,高收入个体怀孕期间医疗补助资格的增加似乎提高了独家医疗补助的利用率,减少了不保险,但也减少了私人保险,但对GAb没有明显影响。医疗补助政策应该在减少无保险和将稀缺资源导向高风险人群之间取得平衡。
The Impact of Increased Medicaid Eligibility During Pregnancy on Medicaid Utilization and Gestational Age.
Objective: To assess the impact of increased Medicaid income eligibility during pregnancy on payment source for prenatal care and birth and on gestational age at birth (GAb).
Study setting and design: We performed a quasi-experimental, difference-in-differences study comparing two increases in Medicaid income eligibility during pregnancy to two control states with data from 2007 to 2010: (Dyad 1) Ohio (expanded from 150% to 200% of the Federal Poverty level [FPL]) versus Pennsylvania and (Dyad 2) Wisconsin (185% to 250% FPL) versus Michigan. We performed multinomial logistic regression to assess the impact of increased Medicaid eligibility on the following key outcome variables: payment source for prenatal care and birth and GAb.
Data sources and analytic sample: We utilized CDC Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data (2007-2010) and limited analysis to singleton, in-state live births. After re-weighting for PRAMS survey design, our analytical sample represented about 540,000 births.
Principal findings: In the higher-income Wisconsin-Michigan dyad, increased Medicaid eligibility during pregnancy significantly increased exclusive Medicaid coverage for prenatal care (7.0%, 95% CI 2.9% to 11.1%) and birth (8.3%, 4.3% to 12.4%). Simultaneously, private insurance coverage dropped for prenatal care (-4.0%, -7.7% to -0.3%) and birth (-3.7%, -7.2% to -0.2%) while self-payment decreased only for birth (-1.8%, -3.5% to -0.2%). In the lower-income Ohio-Pennsylvania dyad, the only statistically significant effects on payment source were decreases in the likelihood of a payment source of other for prenatal care (-3.3%, -6.2% to -0.3%) and birth (-4.7%, -7.9% to -1.6%). There were no statistically significant effects on GAb across both dyads.
Conclusions: Increased Medicaid eligibility during pregnancy for individuals of higher income seems to improve utilization of exclusive Medicaid with diminished uninsurance but also less private insurance after accounting for indicators of socioeconomic advantage but has no clear impact on GAb. Medicaid policy should balance reducing uninsurance with directing scarce resources to high-risk individuals.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.