胃肠外科手术的捆绑支付方案和实践模式的变化。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Cody Lendon Mullens, David Schwartzman, Samantha L Savitch, Jyothi R Thumma, Scott E Regenbogen, Justin B Dimick, Edward C Norton, Kyle H Sheetz
{"title":"胃肠外科手术的捆绑支付方案和实践模式的变化。","authors":"Cody Lendon Mullens, David Schwartzman, Samantha L Savitch, Jyothi R Thumma, Scott E Regenbogen, Justin B Dimick, Edward C Norton, Kyle H Sheetz","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between enrollment in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement -Advanced (BPCI-A) program and changes in utilization of minimally invasive surgery and 90-day episode spending for patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We compared hospitals that voluntarily enrolled in BPCI-A to control hospitals that did not participate. We used entropy balancing to reweight controls to match the BPCI-A cohort based on observable patient and hospital characteristics. We then used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the association between surgical approach and 90-day episode payments.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used Medicare claims and American Hospital Association data between 2013 and 2021 to evaluate whether hospital enrollment in the BPCI-A program was associated with changes in 90-day episode spending and utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches. Using entropy balancing, we reweighted the control group to achieve covariate balance with beneficiaries who obtained care at BPCI-A program hospitals. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis using multivariable linear and generalized linear models, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, with standard errors clustered at the hospital-year level to evaluate these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Changes in 90-day episode payments at BPCI-A program hospitals versus non-program hospitals were not significantly different (-$172, 95% CI: -$1104 to $760). In comparing trends at BPCI-A program and control hospitals, we identified no significant differences in utilization trends for minimally invasive surgical approaches (relative risk difference: -0.003, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.04). The similarity in utilization trends between BPCI-A program and control hospitals was observed in the context of increasing overall utilization of MIS approaches from 40.3 to 38.4 to 43.9 to 42.9 during the study period, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that hospitals participating in BPCI-A's major bowel surgery episodes led to differences in episode spending or utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bundled Payment Programs and Changes in Practice Patterns and Episode Spending in Major Gastrointestinal Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Cody Lendon Mullens, David Schwartzman, Samantha L Savitch, Jyothi R Thumma, Scott E Regenbogen, Justin B Dimick, Edward C Norton, Kyle H Sheetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between enrollment in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement -Advanced (BPCI-A) program and changes in utilization of minimally invasive surgery and 90-day episode spending for patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We compared hospitals that voluntarily enrolled in BPCI-A to control hospitals that did not participate. We used entropy balancing to reweight controls to match the BPCI-A cohort based on observable patient and hospital characteristics. We then used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the association between surgical approach and 90-day episode payments.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used Medicare claims and American Hospital Association data between 2013 and 2021 to evaluate whether hospital enrollment in the BPCI-A program was associated with changes in 90-day episode spending and utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches. Using entropy balancing, we reweighted the control group to achieve covariate balance with beneficiaries who obtained care at BPCI-A program hospitals. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis using multivariable linear and generalized linear models, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, with standard errors clustered at the hospital-year level to evaluate these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Changes in 90-day episode payments at BPCI-A program hospitals versus non-program hospitals were not significantly different (-$172, 95% CI: -$1104 to $760). In comparing trends at BPCI-A program and control hospitals, we identified no significant differences in utilization trends for minimally invasive surgical approaches (relative risk difference: -0.003, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.04). The similarity in utilization trends between BPCI-A program and control hospitals was observed in the context of increasing overall utilization of MIS approaches from 40.3 to 38.4 to 43.9 to 42.9 during the study period, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that hospitals participating in BPCI-A's major bowel surgery episodes led to differences in episode spending or utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估纳入BPCI-A计划与大胃肠手术患者微创手术使用率和90天发作花费的变化之间的关系。研究设置和设计:我们比较了自愿参加BPCI-A的医院和未参加的对照医院。我们根据观察到的患者和医院特征,使用熵平衡来重新加权对照,以匹配BPCI-A队列。然后,我们使用差异中的差异方法来估计手术入路与90天发作付款之间的关系。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用2013年至2021年间的医疗保险索赔和美国医院协会的数据来评估BPCI-A项目的住院登记是否与90天住院费用的变化和微创手术入路的使用有关。利用熵平衡,我们对对照组进行了重新加权,以实现在BPCI-A项目医院接受治疗的受益人的协变量平衡。我们使用多变量线性和广义线性模型进行了差异中差异分析,调整了患者人口统计学、合并症和医院特征,并在医院年水平上聚集了标准误差,以评估这些结果。主要发现:BPCI-A项目医院与非项目医院的90天发作付款变化无显著差异(- 172美元,95% CI: - 1104美元至760美元)。在比较BPCI-A项目和对照医院的趋势时,我们发现微创手术入路的使用趋势没有显著差异(相对风险差异:-0.003,95% CI: -0.10至0.04)。在研究期间,BPCI-A项目和对照医院的MIS方法的总体利用率分别从40.3提高到38.4,从43.9提高到42.9,在这种情况下,利用趋势相似。结论:我们没有发现任何证据表明参与BPCI-A大肠手术的医院会导致发作花费或微创手术入路的使用差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bundled Payment Programs and Changes in Practice Patterns and Episode Spending in Major Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the association between enrollment in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement -Advanced (BPCI-A) program and changes in utilization of minimally invasive surgery and 90-day episode spending for patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

Study setting and design: We compared hospitals that voluntarily enrolled in BPCI-A to control hospitals that did not participate. We used entropy balancing to reweight controls to match the BPCI-A cohort based on observable patient and hospital characteristics. We then used a difference-in-differences approach to estimate the association between surgical approach and 90-day episode payments.

Data sources and analytic sample: We used Medicare claims and American Hospital Association data between 2013 and 2021 to evaluate whether hospital enrollment in the BPCI-A program was associated with changes in 90-day episode spending and utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches. Using entropy balancing, we reweighted the control group to achieve covariate balance with beneficiaries who obtained care at BPCI-A program hospitals. We performed a difference-in-differences analysis using multivariable linear and generalized linear models, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, with standard errors clustered at the hospital-year level to evaluate these outcomes.

Principal findings: Changes in 90-day episode payments at BPCI-A program hospitals versus non-program hospitals were not significantly different (-$172, 95% CI: -$1104 to $760). In comparing trends at BPCI-A program and control hospitals, we identified no significant differences in utilization trends for minimally invasive surgical approaches (relative risk difference: -0.003, 95% CI: -0.10 to 0.04). The similarity in utilization trends between BPCI-A program and control hospitals was observed in the context of increasing overall utilization of MIS approaches from 40.3 to 38.4 to 43.9 to 42.9 during the study period, respectively.

Conclusions: We found no evidence that hospitals participating in BPCI-A's major bowel surgery episodes led to differences in episode spending or utilization of minimally invasive surgical approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信