三种给药装置在猪冠状动脉中的药代动力学比较。

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Takamasa Tanaka, Rika Kawakami, Tatsuya Shiraki, Takafumi Nakayama, Kazuhiro Fujiyoshi, Tomoyo Hamana, Yusuke Adachi, Atsushi Sakamoto, Alyssa Grogan, Renu Virmani, Aloke V Finn
{"title":"三种给药装置在猪冠状动脉中的药代动力学比较。","authors":"Takamasa Tanaka, Rika Kawakami, Tatsuya Shiraki, Takafumi Nakayama, Kazuhiro Fujiyoshi, Tomoyo Hamana, Yusuke Adachi, Atsushi Sakamoto, Alyssa Grogan, Renu Virmani, Aloke V Finn","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter-based drug delivery systems have evolved in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) deliver agents to obstructive atherosclerotic lesions without permanent implants, but their pharmacokinetic profiles vary and may affect efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven Yucatan Miniature Swine underwent treatment with SEL-SEB (SELUTION SLR™), MT-SCB (MagicTouch™), or EES (XIENCE™) in the right coronary or left circumflex arteries. Drug levels were measured in treated arteries and downstream myocardium at 7, 60, and 90 days. MT-SCB samples were extracted with ZnSO₄/methanol, whereas SEL-SEB samples underwent two-step extraction (ZnSO₄/methanol followed by acetonitrile/acetone).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 54 arteries underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation (n = 6 treated arteries per time point) from 27 swine. At 7 days, the mean of arterial drug levels was 1767.5 ng/g for SEL-SEB, 1136.5 ng/g for MT-SCB, and 1057.4 ng/g for EES (p = 0.94). By 60 days, SEL-SEB and EES maintained high levels (1146.3 and 837.3 ng/g), while MT-SCB fell sharply to 5.8 ng/g (p < 0.05). At 90 days, SEL-SEB and EES remained stable (360.7 ng/g and 916.5 ng/g, respectively), although MT-SCB was negligible, 2.0 ng/g (p < 0.05). Drug levels in the downstream myocardium at 7 days were lowest with EES (0.1 ng/g), higher with SEL-SEB (11.3 ng/g), and highest with MT-SCB (281.5 ng/g) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SEL-SEB shows sustained arterial drug retention, more closely resembling the gold-standard EES. This data suggests that SEL-SEB should produce durable outcomes without the need for a permanent implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pharmacokinetic comparison between three drug delivery devices in porcine coronary arteries.\",\"authors\":\"Takamasa Tanaka, Rika Kawakami, Tatsuya Shiraki, Takafumi Nakayama, Kazuhiro Fujiyoshi, Tomoyo Hamana, Yusuke Adachi, Atsushi Sakamoto, Alyssa Grogan, Renu Virmani, Aloke V Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter-based drug delivery systems have evolved in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) deliver agents to obstructive atherosclerotic lesions without permanent implants, but their pharmacokinetic profiles vary and may affect efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty-seven Yucatan Miniature Swine underwent treatment with SEL-SEB (SELUTION SLR™), MT-SCB (MagicTouch™), or EES (XIENCE™) in the right coronary or left circumflex arteries. Drug levels were measured in treated arteries and downstream myocardium at 7, 60, and 90 days. MT-SCB samples were extracted with ZnSO₄/methanol, whereas SEL-SEB samples underwent two-step extraction (ZnSO₄/methanol followed by acetonitrile/acetone).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 54 arteries underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation (n = 6 treated arteries per time point) from 27 swine. At 7 days, the mean of arterial drug levels was 1767.5 ng/g for SEL-SEB, 1136.5 ng/g for MT-SCB, and 1057.4 ng/g for EES (p = 0.94). By 60 days, SEL-SEB and EES maintained high levels (1146.3 and 837.3 ng/g), while MT-SCB fell sharply to 5.8 ng/g (p < 0.05). At 90 days, SEL-SEB and EES remained stable (360.7 ng/g and 916.5 ng/g, respectively), although MT-SCB was negligible, 2.0 ng/g (p < 0.05). Drug levels in the downstream myocardium at 7 days were lowest with EES (0.1 ng/g), higher with SEL-SEB (11.3 ng/g), and highest with MT-SCB (281.5 ng/g) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SEL-SEB shows sustained arterial drug retention, more closely resembling the gold-standard EES. This data suggests that SEL-SEB should produce durable outcomes without the need for a permanent implant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.09.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中,基于导管的给药系统已经发展起来。药物包被球囊(DCBs)在没有永久性植入的情况下向阻塞性动脉粥样硬化病变输送药物,但它们的药代动力学特征不同,可能影响疗效和安全性。方法:27只尤卡坦迷你猪接受右冠状动脉或左旋动脉SELUTION SLR™、MT-SCB (MagicTouch™)或EES (XIENCE™)治疗。在第7、60和90天测量治疗动脉和下游心肌的药物水平。MT-SCB样品采用硫酸锌/甲醇萃取,SEL-SEB样品采用两步萃取(硫酸锌/甲醇-乙腈/丙酮)。结果:27头猪共54条动脉进行了药代动力学评估(每个时间点n = 6条治疗动脉)。7 d时,SEL-SEB、MT-SCB和EES的平均动脉药物水平分别为1767.5 ng/g、1136.5 ng/g和1057.4 ng/g (p = 0.94)。60 d时,SEL-SEB和EES维持较高水平(1146.3和837.3 ng/g),而MT-SCB则急剧下降至5.8 ng/g (p)。结论:SEL-SEB表现出持续的动脉药物潴留,更接近金标准EES。这些数据表明,SEL-SEB可以产生持久的结果,而无需永久植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pharmacokinetic comparison between three drug delivery devices in porcine coronary arteries.

Background: Catheter-based drug delivery systems have evolved in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) deliver agents to obstructive atherosclerotic lesions without permanent implants, but their pharmacokinetic profiles vary and may affect efficacy and safety.

Method: Twenty-seven Yucatan Miniature Swine underwent treatment with SEL-SEB (SELUTION SLR™), MT-SCB (MagicTouch™), or EES (XIENCE™) in the right coronary or left circumflex arteries. Drug levels were measured in treated arteries and downstream myocardium at 7, 60, and 90 days. MT-SCB samples were extracted with ZnSO₄/methanol, whereas SEL-SEB samples underwent two-step extraction (ZnSO₄/methanol followed by acetonitrile/acetone).

Result: A total of 54 arteries underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation (n = 6 treated arteries per time point) from 27 swine. At 7 days, the mean of arterial drug levels was 1767.5 ng/g for SEL-SEB, 1136.5 ng/g for MT-SCB, and 1057.4 ng/g for EES (p = 0.94). By 60 days, SEL-SEB and EES maintained high levels (1146.3 and 837.3 ng/g), while MT-SCB fell sharply to 5.8 ng/g (p < 0.05). At 90 days, SEL-SEB and EES remained stable (360.7 ng/g and 916.5 ng/g, respectively), although MT-SCB was negligible, 2.0 ng/g (p < 0.05). Drug levels in the downstream myocardium at 7 days were lowest with EES (0.1 ng/g), higher with SEL-SEB (11.3 ng/g), and highest with MT-SCB (281.5 ng/g) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: SEL-SEB shows sustained arterial drug retention, more closely resembling the gold-standard EES. This data suggests that SEL-SEB should produce durable outcomes without the need for a permanent implant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信