Thomas J Wood, Sameer Parpia, Isabelle Tate, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud, Michael Tanzer, Adam Hart, Anthony Albers, Qirui Hou, Mohit Bhandari
{"title":"全关节置换术中预防感染新疗法(prevention - it)的前瞻性随机评价:可行性和安全性研究。","authors":"Thomas J Wood, Sameer Parpia, Isabelle Tate, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud, Michael Tanzer, Adam Hart, Anthony Albers, Qirui Hou, Mohit Bhandari","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the success of total joint arthroplasty for end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and leading cause of revision surgery. Antiseptic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics are promising and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of PJIs, though high-quality evidence assessing their efficacy is lacking. Therefore, this study investigates the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to determine the optimal prophylactic treatment of PJIs using various irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a simple randomized 3 × 2 factorial trial, patients were randomized across 5 centers to 1 of 6 possible treatments (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine-gluconate, or saline, with or without vancomycin). Nine criteria were assessed to evaluate feasibility including participant enrollment, administration of treatments, data collection methods, and protocol compliance. Adverse event rates were used to assess trial safety. Secondary outcomes included rates of PJI requiring reoperation and persistent wound drainage (PWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and ninety-five participants were included in the pilot trial. Study participants were 56% female with a mean age of 67 years. Seven of the 9 criteria assessing feasibility indicated the trial was successful and no modifications needed. Two criteria, treatment contamination (8.5%) and completeness of patient follow-up (93.8%), were graded as requiring minor adjustment before conducting the definitive trial. There were 114 serious adverse events; none of which were deemed associated with the treatments. Overall, 9 (1.84%) presented with PJIs requiring reoperation, and 6 patients (1.12%) presented with PWD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of prophylactic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics. PREVENT-IT has received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research toward the definitive, large, multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT06126614).Ultimately, findings will directly affect clinical practice with the potential to positively influence global rates of PJI.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prospective Randomized EValuation of Emerging Novel Treatments for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement (PREVENT-iT): Feasibility and Safety Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J Wood, Sameer Parpia, Isabelle Tate, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud, Michael Tanzer, Adam Hart, Anthony Albers, Qirui Hou, Mohit Bhandari\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the success of total joint arthroplasty for end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and leading cause of revision surgery. Antiseptic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics are promising and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of PJIs, though high-quality evidence assessing their efficacy is lacking. Therefore, this study investigates the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to determine the optimal prophylactic treatment of PJIs using various irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a simple randomized 3 × 2 factorial trial, patients were randomized across 5 centers to 1 of 6 possible treatments (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine-gluconate, or saline, with or without vancomycin). Nine criteria were assessed to evaluate feasibility including participant enrollment, administration of treatments, data collection methods, and protocol compliance. Adverse event rates were used to assess trial safety. Secondary outcomes included rates of PJI requiring reoperation and persistent wound drainage (PWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and ninety-five participants were included in the pilot trial. Study participants were 56% female with a mean age of 67 years. Seven of the 9 criteria assessing feasibility indicated the trial was successful and no modifications needed. Two criteria, treatment contamination (8.5%) and completeness of patient follow-up (93.8%), were graded as requiring minor adjustment before conducting the definitive trial. There were 114 serious adverse events; none of which were deemed associated with the treatments. Overall, 9 (1.84%) presented with PJIs requiring reoperation, and 6 patients (1.12%) presented with PWD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of prophylactic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics. PREVENT-IT has received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research toward the definitive, large, multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT06126614).Ultimately, findings will directly affect clinical practice with the potential to positively influence global rates of PJI.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>NA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12431753/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:尽管全关节置换术成功治疗了终末期髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎,但假体周围关节感染(PJI)仍然是一个毁灭性的并发症和翻修手术的主要原因。消毒冲洗液和局部抗生素是预防PJIs的有希望且具有成本效益的策略,尽管缺乏评估其有效性的高质量证据。因此,本研究探讨了进行一项明确试验的可行性,以确定使用各种冲洗液和局部抗生素对PJIs的最佳预防治疗。方法:采用简单的随机3 × 2因子试验,患者被随机分为5个中心,接受6种可能的治疗(聚维酮碘、葡萄糖酸氯己定或生理盐水,加或不加万古霉素)中的1种。评估了9项标准来评估可行性,包括参与者入组、治疗管理、数据收集方法和方案依从性。不良事件发生率用于评估试验的安全性。次要结果包括需要再次手术的PJI发生率和持续伤口引流(PWD)。结果:495名受试者被纳入试点试验。研究参与者中56%为女性,平均年龄为67岁。评估可行性的9项标准中有7项表明试验是成功的,不需要修改。治疗污染(8.5%)和患者随访的完整性(93.8%)这两个标准被分级为需要在进行最终试验之前进行轻微调整。严重不良事件114例;没有一个被认为与治疗有关。总体而言,9例(1.84%)患者出现PJIs需要再次手术,6例(1.12%)患者出现PWD。结论:本研究证明了预防性冲洗液和外用抗生素的可行性和安全性。prevention - it已获得加拿大卫生研究院(Canadian Institutes of Health Research)的资助,用于进行一项明确的、大型的、多中心的随机对照试验(NCT06126614)。最终,研究结果将直接影响临床实践,有可能对PJI的全球发病率产生积极影响。证据等级:NA。
The Prospective Randomized EValuation of Emerging Novel Treatments for Infection Prophylaxis in Total Joint Replacement (PREVENT-iT): Feasibility and Safety Study.
Background: Despite the success of total joint arthroplasty for end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and leading cause of revision surgery. Antiseptic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics are promising and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of PJIs, though high-quality evidence assessing their efficacy is lacking. Therefore, this study investigates the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to determine the optimal prophylactic treatment of PJIs using various irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics.
Methods: Using a simple randomized 3 × 2 factorial trial, patients were randomized across 5 centers to 1 of 6 possible treatments (povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine-gluconate, or saline, with or without vancomycin). Nine criteria were assessed to evaluate feasibility including participant enrollment, administration of treatments, data collection methods, and protocol compliance. Adverse event rates were used to assess trial safety. Secondary outcomes included rates of PJI requiring reoperation and persistent wound drainage (PWD).
Results: Four hundred and ninety-five participants were included in the pilot trial. Study participants were 56% female with a mean age of 67 years. Seven of the 9 criteria assessing feasibility indicated the trial was successful and no modifications needed. Two criteria, treatment contamination (8.5%) and completeness of patient follow-up (93.8%), were graded as requiring minor adjustment before conducting the definitive trial. There were 114 serious adverse events; none of which were deemed associated with the treatments. Overall, 9 (1.84%) presented with PJIs requiring reoperation, and 6 patients (1.12%) presented with PWD.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of prophylactic irrigation solutions and topical antibiotics. PREVENT-IT has received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research toward the definitive, large, multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT06126614).Ultimately, findings will directly affect clinical practice with the potential to positively influence global rates of PJI.