不仅仅是一个问题:助产士在产前护理中解决暴力的方法的对话分析。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marit Nygård Halvorsen, Mirjam Lukasse, Anne Marie Landmark
{"title":"不仅仅是一个问题:助产士在产前护理中解决暴力的方法的对话分析。","authors":"Marit Nygård Halvorsen, Mirjam Lukasse, Anne Marie Landmark","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antenatal care consultations provide a critical opportunity to enquire about experiences of violence, yet midwives often face structural and practical barriers. Although several countries have implemented guidelines recommending routine enquiry, limited research has examined how midwives introduce this sensitive topic during consultations. This study uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine how midwives introduce questions about violence in 35 antenatal care consultations recorded in Norway, where the topic was raised in 21 cases. In all but one instance, midwives engaged in some form of interactional preparation before asking the question. Our findings identify two main approaches for introducing the topic: a task-oriented approach and a conversational approach. The task-oriented approach is characterised by its routine framing of the enquiry, accomplished through procedural pre-sequences and explicit references to institutional mandates. In contrast, the conversational approach is characterised by a gradual, sequential progression into the topic, achieved through the incorporation of related proxy topics or by responding to troubles-talk. Although each approach has distinct advantages and limitations, our analysis reveals that midwives address enquiries about violence with profound interactional sensitivity. These findings demonstrate how preparatory work functions as an interactional display of delicacy in managing sensitive topics, with implications for training and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"47 7","pages":"e70081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Than a Question: A Conversation Analysis of Midwives' Approaches to Addressing Violence in Antenatal Care.\",\"authors\":\"Marit Nygård Halvorsen, Mirjam Lukasse, Anne Marie Landmark\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9566.70081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antenatal care consultations provide a critical opportunity to enquire about experiences of violence, yet midwives often face structural and practical barriers. Although several countries have implemented guidelines recommending routine enquiry, limited research has examined how midwives introduce this sensitive topic during consultations. This study uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine how midwives introduce questions about violence in 35 antenatal care consultations recorded in Norway, where the topic was raised in 21 cases. In all but one instance, midwives engaged in some form of interactional preparation before asking the question. Our findings identify two main approaches for introducing the topic: a task-oriented approach and a conversational approach. The task-oriented approach is characterised by its routine framing of the enquiry, accomplished through procedural pre-sequences and explicit references to institutional mandates. In contrast, the conversational approach is characterised by a gradual, sequential progression into the topic, achieved through the incorporation of related proxy topics or by responding to troubles-talk. Although each approach has distinct advantages and limitations, our analysis reveals that midwives address enquiries about violence with profound interactional sensitivity. These findings demonstrate how preparatory work functions as an interactional display of delicacy in managing sensitive topics, with implications for training and policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology of health & illness\",\"volume\":\"47 7\",\"pages\":\"e70081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology of health & illness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

产前保健咨询为询问暴力经历提供了重要机会,但助产士往往面临结构性和实际障碍。尽管一些国家已经实施了建议例行询问的指导方针,但有限的研究调查了助产士在咨询期间如何介绍这一敏感话题。本研究使用对话分析(CA)来检查助产士如何在挪威记录的35个产前保健咨询中介绍有关暴力的问题,其中21个案例提出了该主题。除一例外,助产士在提问前都进行了某种形式的互动准备。我们的发现确定了引入主题的两种主要方法:以任务为导向的方法和会话方法。以任务为导向的方法的特点是其例行的调查框架,通过程序前置程序和明确提及机构授权来完成。相比之下,会话式的特点是逐步地、顺序地进入话题,通过结合相关的代理话题或通过对麻烦谈话的回应来实现。虽然每种方法都有不同的优点和局限性,但我们的分析表明,助产士处理有关暴力的询问具有深刻的相互敏感性。这些研究结果表明,筹备工作如何在管理敏感议题方面发挥微妙的相互作用,并对培训和政策产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More Than a Question: A Conversation Analysis of Midwives' Approaches to Addressing Violence in Antenatal Care.

Antenatal care consultations provide a critical opportunity to enquire about experiences of violence, yet midwives often face structural and practical barriers. Although several countries have implemented guidelines recommending routine enquiry, limited research has examined how midwives introduce this sensitive topic during consultations. This study uses conversation analysis (CA) to examine how midwives introduce questions about violence in 35 antenatal care consultations recorded in Norway, where the topic was raised in 21 cases. In all but one instance, midwives engaged in some form of interactional preparation before asking the question. Our findings identify two main approaches for introducing the topic: a task-oriented approach and a conversational approach. The task-oriented approach is characterised by its routine framing of the enquiry, accomplished through procedural pre-sequences and explicit references to institutional mandates. In contrast, the conversational approach is characterised by a gradual, sequential progression into the topic, achieved through the incorporation of related proxy topics or by responding to troubles-talk. Although each approach has distinct advantages and limitations, our analysis reveals that midwives address enquiries about violence with profound interactional sensitivity. These findings demonstrate how preparatory work functions as an interactional display of delicacy in managing sensitive topics, with implications for training and policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信